# Dismantling Racism in Mathematics Instruction

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [February 15, 2021, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992 "2021-02-15T22:33:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dropzone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dropzone/32/7515_2.png) [@dropzone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dropzone)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/21 "2021-02-16T00:07:44Z")

</div>

When New Math came to town in sixth grade they told me, to the extent that I could understand them, that you use arithmetic to find the answer and mathematics to demonstrate you know why.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/22 "2021-02-16T00:20:59Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> I really wonder how they came up with their list,

Maybe you should ask them to show their work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fretful\_Porpentine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fretful_porpentine/32/2873_2.png) [@Fretful\_Porpentine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fretful_Porpentine)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 12:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/23 "2021-02-16T00:22:52Z")

</div>

In general, I think there’s this popular semi-fallacy in the educational profession where people think that if students of color consistently do worse than white students at some type of assessment, it’s the _assessment_ that is racist, rather than whatever educational disparities might be causing the performance gap. (I say “semi-fallacy” because it’s legitimately the case that the assessment can be the problem _some_ of the time – for example, a test of reading skills where students with certain types of background knowledge will find most of the passages easier to comprehend than students without that knowledge.)

We have a natural bias toward changing the stuff we _can_ change relatively easily, but often that’s not what actually needs to change. So, for example, you get colleges that go standardized-test-optional and pat themselves on the back for striking a blow for diversity, when addressing the actual problem – the factors that _cause_ white and Asian students to score higher on such tests than students of other backgrounds – would be much harder and beyond the scope of any single institution.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Icarus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icarus/32/72_2.png) [@Icarus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icarus)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 12:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/24 "2021-02-16T00:27:49Z")

</div>

> [@Jas09](#):
>
> To put a little context on the OP, Fox News reported that a flyer sent to Oregon math teachers from the Oregon DOE included a link to this website along with another link to register for a “micro course”. This document has absolutely nothing to do with approved teaching in Oregon or the state-mandated curriculum. You can see the flyer here: [Math Educator Update: February 2021](https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/ORED/bulletins/2bfbb9b?fbclid=IwAR3U8iS7fCD-g0NArQh74qlRa5IVFiTXoithZA89kMvmD0DETmzcV9DuQdg)

So, this whole thing is FOX News “liberalz are dumb” outrage clickbait? I’ll pass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 12:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/25 "2021-02-16T00:38:10Z")

</div>

The only other possible intelligent comment/instruction/question for the teacher to use here other than “Show your work” is “Did you cheat?”

This is unadulterated nonsense. It strikes me like the worship of Bloom’s taxonomy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/26 "2021-02-16T00:42:07Z")

</div>

Hey, how are you supposed to know if you’re in the majority if you can’t do the math “correctly”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Northern\_Piper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/northern_piper/32/5304_2.png) [@Northern\_Piper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Northern_Piper)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/27 "2021-02-16T00:43:30Z")

</div>

> [@Fretful\_Porpentine](#):
>
> a test of reading skills where students with certain types of background knowledge will find most of the passages easier to comprehend than students without that knowledge

That comment does make sense to me, as an area where there can be a bias built in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/28 "2021-02-16T00:46:28Z")

</div>

If this treatise–too damn long to be called a pamphlet, IMHO–were to address stereotypes in the questions, I’d understand what they’re getting at and likely support it. What I’ve read thus far in that treatise and in this thread show me why those who wrote this treatise are wary of the written word.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 2:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/29 "2021-02-16T02:33:11Z")

</div>

Is there any evidence that this treatise is going to have any actual effect on Oregon’s math education. It’s an extremely silly manifesto, but can Demon Tree explain how this will actually effect Oregon math education? Show your work, Demon Tree.

Googling this doc I can find nothing but breathless screeds in The Daily Caller, The Epoch Times, The New York Post, etc. If I didn’t know better, I’d say this was a concern-trolling bad faith OP. But I know Demon Tree would never do that, so I await her detailed explanation of what she is worried about. (I assume she is an Oregon parent, for I can’t figure out why else she would care)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 2:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/30 "2021-02-16T02:41:40Z")

</div>

Ok, so I’ve read the document: I’m interested in teaching and have some background in teaching math.

Firstly, it says right up front:

> This tool provides teachers an opportunity to examine their actions, beliefs, and values around teaching mathematics.

It’s not prescriptive, it’s not a curriculum or a methodology or even a ‘praxis’ ☹ It’s a tool for self examination.

Secondly, the meaning isn’t as bad as extracts from the text would suggest.

And thirdly, it is in itself an example of what it decries: a teaching tool that excludes people who don’t have the “correct” cultural and educational background and environment.

For reason number 3, I struggled to get through it … but I’m half forgiving, because it is such a good example of what they are talking about, and the exercise of parsing and mastering the document is such a good demonstration of the problem they are addressing.

Having struggled through the document, you are permitted to disagree with it (that’s part of the point), but actually there is nothing I could find to disagree with. The only danger I can see is that someone reading this, or reading about it, might **completely miss the point** – a danger that is possible because the point is somewhat hidden by the implied content and assumed cultural background.

For those of you who aren’t reading it and forming your own opinion, I think my summery is: you have to already know what they mean to make sense out of what they said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jas09](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d07c76/32.png) [@Jas09](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jas09)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 3:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/31 "2021-02-16T03:08:57Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> I really wonder how they came up with their list, and what eg showing your work has to do with white supremacy. A few of the things are obvious, with most it’s obscure.

To play devil’s advocate, because I’m not an expert by any means and am not positive I understand it, the logic of how “show your work” plays into a white-supremacist paradigm is as follows:

1. The current power system is white supremacy (this is sort of the default starting point or you won’t get anywhere, so I’m not at all interested in debating this one).
2. Systems of education rely heavily on the built-in inertia of the system of teaching itself, which was built and defined by that white-supremacist system.
3. Specifically for math education these often rely on very regimented methods of demonstrating mathematical knowledge. These often go so far as to be an entirely separate language, which can be exceptionally difficult for students that don’t have strong English skills or a background that supports them learning this specialized language.
4. When a student of color (or, really, any struggling student) fails to show their work using this particular language, they are judged as being “bad at math” (or, as mentioned above, as cheating). It’s entirely possible they actually do understand how to manipulate the numbers to get the correct answer (or at least close to it) but their lack of background in the language of expressing it cripples their learning.

Finally, since those students most likely to struggle are those without the background necessary to know the specialized language of mathematics, it perpetuates the cycle of “white/Asian kids are good at math, black kids aren’t”.

I don’t entirely buy it, but since the workshop is basically just asking teachers to examine themselves and their modes of teaching to attempt to identify areas where maybe they are not communicating to their entire class by locking themselves into particular methods I see absolutely no reason to get worked up about it. Unless, of course, you are into that sort of thing (or are interested in getting lots of click-though ad revenue, I suppose…).

I’m pretty sure the framing of “white supremacy” is unhelpful at this point, and wish advocacy groups would focus on alternative methods and inclusive teaching styles rather than relying on rhetoric that is guaranteed to inflame at least some of their potential audience.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 3:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/32 "2021-02-16T03:26:55Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> Maybe you can noodle it out or mentally eyeball it as its own problem but that doesn’t mean you’ll be able to do the same when it’s part of a more intensive multistep math process. Showing your work seems pretty important.

Indeed. I appreciate and still think about a post that @Left_Hand_of_Dorkness made a few years ago:

> [@Oxford University gave students 15 extra minutes to take exams.](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/oxford-university-gave-students-15-extra-minutes-to-take-exams/807284/28):
>
> I am rage-twitching. Two weeks ago I gave my kids a computerized math test, required by my district, along with a sheet of paper. “SHOW YOUR WORK,” I demanded, in keeping with what I’ve been telling them all year. The test is adaptive (changes according to student responses), and shows progress from the beginning of the year. Four kids either showed minimal progress from the beginning of the year or actually dropped in scores. So I called them over, showed them their scores, and showed them …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 3:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/33 "2021-02-16T03:33:52Z")

</div>

> [@Jas09](#):
>
> Specifically for math education these often rely on very regimented methods of demonstrating mathematical knowledge. These often go so far as to be an entirely separate language, which can be exceptionally difficult for students that don’t have strong English skills or a background that supports them learning this specialized language.

Yup, this is a good point. A huge part of bad math teaching is the incorrect assumption that math is somehow independent of language, so if you’re not doing math successfully in the prescribed way, it must be because you’re bad at math.

So the students who struggle with understanding English, or who are insecure about their written English ability so they write down as little as they can, make mistakes in prescribed procedures and thus get labeled “bad at math”.

> [@Jas09](#):
>
> I’m pretty sure the framing of “white supremacy” is unhelpful at this point, and wish advocacy groups would focus on alternative methods and inclusive teaching styles

Yeah, I think there’s no question that a lot of the advice about rethinking the structure of math presentation and focusing on more thoughtful approaches would be helpful in producing more effective math education for students of all races. Emphasizing racial issues in math pedagogy reform undoubtedly reinforces the lazy stereotype that non-white students need “dumbed-down” math.

To be fair, though, in a historically and persistently racist society, whenever anything is presented in a thoughtlessly traditional way, it tends to perpetuate ideas of white people as the “default human beings”. How many non-white people were ever distinctly visible in 20th-century math textbooks, as authors, as mentioned historical figures, as characters in word problems, as anything? So while I see a lot of potential problems with this particular workbook approach, I also see where the authors are coming from.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 3:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/34 "2021-02-16T03:39:39Z")

</div>

> [@Wendell\_Wagner](#):
>
> The student says, “It is if you’re using base 8 instead of base 10. 7 and 5 equals 14 in base 8. So put 4 in the rightmost column for the answer. 4 + 1 plus the 1 which was carried equals 6, so put 6 in the column to the left of that. That makes the answer 64.” -

All the teachers agreed the Lehrer kid was a real PIA.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/35 "2021-02-16T04:22:33Z")

</div>

> [@Thudlow\_Boink](#):
>
> Indeed. I appreciate and still think about a post that @Left_Hand_of_Dorkness made a few years ago:

Hah! Glad I made an impression.

Now that I’m specifically working with “gifted” kids, I can teach some more advanced mental math lessons, like how to solve 673-297 mentally (hint: 673-300+3). But after a student wrote on a test, under the “show your work” section, “I did it in my head like Mr. Dorkness taught me to,” I made a whole slide show about _proving your work_ and the importance of doing so.

It’s fine to know mental math strategies, and indeed if you don’t eventually memorize your basic facts you’re gonna run into real troubles with later math. But you should always be able to prove your answer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 4:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/36 "2021-02-16T04:35:10Z")

</div>

Having skimmed that document…meh. I’m pretty unconvinced.

Emphasis on getting the right answer can be kinda fucked up, of course, because (and this may be a shocker) I as the teacher already know the right answer, and I don’t need my students to tell me. My goal isn’t for them to get the right answer in my class, it’s for them to know how to find the answer to similar problems when they’re no longer in my class. What’s in their head–the concepts, the tricks, the reasoning–is the goal, not the scribbles on the page. But I’m not sure that’s what they mean, and I’m not sure calling it “white supremacy” really gets to the heart of the problem.

Same thing with “showing your work.” This shows up on standardized tests with problems like this:

“347 students attended the football game. 169 of these students later tested positive for COVID-19. Which of the following number lines could Principal Skinner use to determine how many of these students did not test positive for COVID-19?”

where you must demonstrate knowledge of specific _methods_ for showing work, rather than showing the ability to reason conceptually toward an answer.

But the idea that a teacher asking students to show work is relying on a crutch? Not seeing it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 6:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/37 "2021-02-16T06:25:25Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> But the idea that a teacher asking students to show work is relying on a crutch? Not seeing it.

Now that I think about it, don’t students have to show their work in other classes as well? When I wrote a persuasive essay in English class I couldn’t just hand in a paper with two or three sentences for a conclusion I had to include paragraphs that supported it. Whenever we did an experiment in science, I had to show the teacher I had a working hypothesis, how I tested it, and how I analyzed the data to come up with the results. As an undergraduate and a graduate student in history, if I made a statement about something without backing it up the instructor would usually ask, “Why do you think that?” When I wrote a paper I had to demonstrate where I found this information I based my interpretation on.

Showing your work is important even once you leave the hallowed halls of our educational centers and suckle on the capitalist teat of corporate America. If I tell my VP one of the reasons the turnover among our programmers is so high because we don’t pay less than the prevailing wage he’s going to want to know where I got my data. If I tell him that management is ready to see a loosening of our dress code he’s going to want to see some concrete reasons behind my opinion before he agrees to change policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 6:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/38 "2021-02-16T06:27:37Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> But the idea that a teacher asking students to show work is relying on a crutch? Not seeing it.

Fortunately, they’ve shown their work, and when you read the previous paragraph, and the next paragraph, you understand that their objection is to replacing education with ‘showing your work’, as if ‘showing your work’ was the purpose of math classes. And the statement about crutches does not say that ‘showing your work’ is always or even often a crutch: it just suggests that it can be used that way. Like an axe. Or a shopping trolley.

And, most important of all, the actual learning point is that there are alternative methods of showing your work, which invites the reflection that active observing / listening is part of being a good teacher.

Because this is a document focusing on the teacher.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OleOneEye](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/f14d63/32.png) [@OleOneEye](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OleOneEye)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/39 "2021-02-16T06:31:54Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> “Show your work” being “White Supremacy” due to “paternalism”

I’m not sure what makes it “paternalism”. When I see things like this, I wonder whether social justice types just randomly open a page in the dictionary and blindly point to a word on the page to form their objections. It would make about as much sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 6:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992/40 "2021-02-16T06:33:51Z")

</div>

Personally, _I don’t object to teachers using crutches_, and I don’t think any other teacher would either. For most of us, anything that helps the teaching is valid. But when doing self-reflection, a teacher should think about the place of the crutch in the classroom, and if it is helping or hindering.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dismantling-racism-in-mathematics-instruction/932992.md?page=3)
