# Dispute on the actual definition of availible

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 27, 2016, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299 "2016-03-27T01:43:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrPengin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f08c70/32.png) [@DrPengin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrPengin)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2016, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/1 "2016-03-27T01:43:13Z")

</div>

I said that if a public toilet is engaged it is still available. I used the example of a hotel opening a new block of toilets, that were available for the next few months until the main toilets are fixed. Even if all the toilets were engaged, they would still be available for the next few months. My friend disagreed. Who is actually correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ethilrist](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ethilrist/32/4604_2.png) [@Ethilrist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ethilrist)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2016, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/2 "2016-03-27T01:48:42Z")

</div>

If you can pee in it without getting punched in the face, it’s available.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2016, 1:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/3 "2016-03-27T01:57:30Z")

</div>

Like most questions about usage, this can’t be answered in the abstract. It needs context.

How are you using “available”? Is the context is the number of toilets that are potentially usable by the public? Is the context the number of toilets immediately usable by public? Is the context something else entirely?

As soon as you define and narrow your context for saying available, its degree of correctness should become obvious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2016, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/4 "2016-03-27T02:18:50Z")

</div>

Yep. This is one of those “Yes and No” answers.

The restrooms are available for use…except for this one which is not available because someone’s in it at the moment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2016, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/5 "2016-03-27T02:31:05Z")

</div>

While someone is using any particular toilet, it’s obviously available to the person who’s using it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CookingWithGas](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cookingwithgas/32/485_2.png) [@CookingWithGas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CookingWithGas)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/6 "2016-03-28T19:22:23Z")

</div>

They are _in service_, but not \*available \*at the moment because they are all engaged. When the main toilets are fixed, these will no longer be in service.

Your friend is correct. Pay up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/7 "2016-03-28T19:49:36Z")

</div>

OP, did you join just to ask this question?! I agree with the previous poster. If it’s currently in use, it is not currently available.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Isilder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/cc9497/32.png) [@Isilder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Isilder)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 3:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/8 "2016-03-30T03:32:09Z")

</div>

But yes OP is correct, its possible to say “available” to mean something different.

Note that the door of the toilet says “engaged”. The word “Engaged” means “serviceable but currently in use”, while “out of service” “under repair” , etc, means “Don’t hold it in waiting for this one !”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecae2f/32.png) [@UDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 4:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/9 "2016-03-30T04:05:08Z")

</div>

Another way of looking at this is to remember that English collapses the distinction between the present instant and the present continuous which other, better-thought-out languages preserve. “I am at my desk” can mean that I am at my desk at this instant, but “I am at my desk during normal office hours” doesn’t preclude the possibility that I might leave it from time to time to go and verify for some pedant how many of the toilet cubicles down the corridor are currently occupied.

“Toilets are available down the corridor” is an example of the present continuous; there are eight toilets down the corridor of which the public may avail. If a member of the public is currently availing himself of one of them, that just underlines that it is (present continuous) available, though it is not (present instant) available to a different member of the public.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickLondon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/patricklondon/32/4422_2.png) [@PatrickLondon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickLondon)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 7:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/10 "2016-03-30T07:36:38Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> Is the context is the number of toilets that are potentially usable by the public? Is the context the number of toilets immediately usable by public? Is the context something else entirely?

Or to put it another way, it depends whether you want to go NOW.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Pearse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/richard_pearse/32/13144_2.png) [@Richard\_Pearse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Pearse)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 8:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/11 "2016-03-30T08:26:08Z")

</div>

The toilets are available to the general public all of the time, however if they are all currently engaged then none of them are available to _you_ right now.

On another related matter, although the toilets are engaged this does not mean they have made a promise to marry in the future, nor does it mean you should hang up and ring back later.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 11:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/12 "2016-03-30T11:31:53Z")

</div>

Shoulda gone before you left the house.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2016, 3:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/13 "2016-03-30T15:17:54Z")

</div>

“Are these toilets available” is one of those ambiguous questions that can have multiple correct answers. It’s like asking someone, “Can I eat this food?” The answer is “yes”, in that if you have a functioning digestive system you physically can. It’s also “yes” if you’re asking whether the food is generally edible, or is safe to eat in its current condition. But it’s “no” if you’re asking permission to eat my lunch.

The ambiguity of such phrases in the English language has led to many sitcom plot lines for decades, and will do so for decades more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Herdthiscat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8baadc/32.png) [@Herdthiscat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Herdthiscat)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 6:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/14 "2016-04-06T06:04:27Z")

</div>

> [@Senegoid](#):
>
> While someone is using any particular toilet, it’s obviously available to the person who’s using it.

If we go with a basic, context-free definition of “available” - being able to avail oneself of it, or being able to give it away - then the toilet can’t technically be available to the current or any other user. “No dice on the deuce device,” so to speak. Although, non-native speaker here, so feel free to school me on this argument :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Herdthiscat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8baadc/32.png) [@Herdthiscat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Herdthiscat)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 6:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/15 "2016-04-06T06:11:56Z")

</div>

> [@Herdthiscat](#):
>
> a basic, context-free definition of “available”

(A definition that, admittedly, focus more on the stem of the word itself, and less on common usage, although i’d think that there is hardly much meaningful difference between both.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 2:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/16 "2016-04-06T14:41:02Z")

</div>

> [@Herdthiscat](#):
>
> If we go with a basic, context-free definition of “available” - being able to avail oneself of it, or being able to give it away - then the toilet can’t technically be available to the current or any other user. “No dice on the deuce device,” so to speak. Although, non-native speaker here, so feel free to school me on this argument :rolleyes:

You’re making a basic mistake. Dictionaries do give a variety of definitions. But they are there so that you can try them in your sentence to see if they fit. The definitions are context free but the applications aren’t. The OP’s sentence was an application. Your attempt at a definition doesn’t work in it. Heck, neither does the [definition](http://www.chambers.co.uk/search.php?query=available&title=21st) “not romantically or sexually involved with anyone”.

In the larger sense, I can’t find any dictionary that reports that as a definition for available. “Being able to give it away” can maybe have some specialized context - “In this culture a bride must be a virgin, so Jane, being a virgin, was available to be a bride” - but that’s fairly tortured and would qualify under other more readily available [definitions](http://www.thefreedictionary.com/available), like #3. (Yes, I see what I did there.)

I suspect you made that up. If I’m wrong, show your cite. Once you make up definitions, any word can mean anything and communication stops.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 2:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/17 "2016-04-06T14:48:38Z")

</div>

Could you make a reservation for the toilets?: [- YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWTMa76BzH0)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Gary\_T](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_T)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 2:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/18 "2016-04-06T14:53:59Z")

</div>

> [@DrPengin](#):
>
> Who is actually correct.

Whoever clearly specified the time frame for which the word “available” applied.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Herdthiscat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8baadc/32.png) [@Herdthiscat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Herdthiscat)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 1:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/19 "2016-04-07T13:56:40Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> You’re making a basic mistake. Dictionaries do give a variety of definitions. But they are there so that you can try them in your sentence to see if they fit. The definitions are context free but the applications aren’t. The OP’s sentence was an application. Your attempt at a definition doesn’t work in it. Heck, neither does the [definition](http://www.chambers.co.uk/search.php?query=available&title=21st) “not romantically or sexually involved with anyone”.
> 
> In the larger sense, I can’t find any dictionary that reports that as a definition for available. “Being able to give it away” can maybe have some specialized context - “In this culture a bride must be a virgin, so Jane, being a virgin, was available to be a bride” - but that’s fairly tortured and would qualify under other more readily available [definitions](http://www.thefreedictionary.com/available), like #3. (Yes, I see what I did there.)
> 
> I suspect you made that up. If I’m wrong, show your cite. Once you make up definitions, any word can mean anything and communication stops.

You are quite right - I went with a gut instinct, and actually looking up the word ([word choice - To avail oneself of an opportunity - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange](http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/52383/to-avail-of-an-opportunity)) shows that it is more related to the idea of “being of value” than “give-away-able”. Consider me schooled 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrotherCadfael](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@BrotherCadfael](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrotherCadfael)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 2:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299/20 "2016-04-07T14:45:09Z")

</div>

> [@DrPengin](#):
>
> I said that if a public toilet is engaged it is still available.

Language question: Is the use of “engaged” in this sentence a British-English thing? It’s perfectly understandable to my American ears, but a bit unusual.

The term is used in the Beatles _You Won’t See Me_: “When I call you up, your line’s engaged…” This usage (with respect to a phone line) is definitely not used in the US.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dispute-on-the-actual-definition-of-availible/750299.md?page=2)
