Okay, so rolled up in my one debate topic there are actually two questions with four total answers.
1 I, a man, would rape the last woman.
2 I, a man, would not rape the last woman.
3 I, a woman, would rape the last man.
4 I, a woman, would not rape the last man.
My position is pretty solid on #2 and I was barely leaning over the fence to reach #4 (if I were a woman). I did not think there is no debate to be had between #3 and #4, or even on my own method of reaching #2.
At least not before Kimstu pointed out a major flaw in my hypo.
I routinely come up with such hypotheticals, and as DemonTree noted I once published one here that she and I think is much more vile and sickly than this. But the purpose is not to out-gross someone, it is to find an edge case and test my own philosophy for consistency. This is a valid form of skepticism, in my opinion.
~Max