# Djokovic's Medical Exemption

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Tags:** tennis\
**Created:** [January 5, 2022, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283 "2022-01-05T21:05:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/81 "2022-01-07T20:07:04Z")

</div>

Ends justify the means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RitterSport](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rittersport/32/6326_2.png) [@RitterSport](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RitterSport)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/82 "2022-01-07T20:07:10Z")

</div>

For what it’s worth, for me it’s not “ends-justify-the-means”, it’s more “ha ha! Antivaxxer is (hopefully) screwed!”

ETA: I would be equally happy if he was stopped at the door of Hamilton after having bought $10,000 tickets because they found his vaccine card to be fake.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/83 "2022-01-07T20:09:02Z")

</div>

> [@iamthewalrus\_3](#):
>
> Sounds a lot like “We shouldn’t have well articulated principles when they prevent us from punishing bad people”.

No, it sounds exactly like what I posted…but I can see why the rewrite was necessary for you to try to make your point

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/84 "2022-01-07T20:09:49Z")

</div>

> [@RitterSport](#):
>
> ETA: I would be equally happy if he was stopped at the door of Hamilton after having bought $10,000 tickets because they found his vaccine card to be fake.

I would be happy too. A fake vaccine card is not compatible with operating in good faith. So far the facts I’ve read about this story are compatible (though I agree with @kenobi_65 that they are also compatible with him trying to cheat and getting caught, and if so none of my arguments apply).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kambuckta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/53a042/32.png) [@kambuckta](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kambuckta)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/85 "2022-01-07T20:09:51Z")

</div>

Just for the record (AIUI) when the visa applications are checked, it is done as a ‘blind’ process with numbers assigned to the applicants instead of names. So Djokevic was not being picked on maliciously, and in fact two other players have had their visas rescinded too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/86 "2022-01-07T20:11:31Z")

</div>

In this case, yes, I think they do.

Do you think that the process did not do what it is intended to do in this case?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/87 "2022-01-07T20:16:40Z")

</div>

Per the website I linked to above, the process is _supposed_ to not let you on the plane if you can’t enter the country. I’d be a lot less sympathetic if he’d been turned away at the airport.

One way to phrase it is: Every person who flies to a country thinking they can enter it and has to turn around and fly back home is a major policy failure.

Another way of responding to your question is: yes, the process did what it was intended to do in this case. I’m not super convinced that it didn’t do so at least a little by accident, and there are _many_ better processes that could have accomplished these goals and also wouldn’t have so much collateral damage.

You can’t determine whether a policy is good by looking at a single example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/88 "2022-01-07T20:21:35Z")

</div>

This thread isn’t examining the policy in general, tho. This thread is examining the policy as it applies to Novak Djokovic.

Is it the best policy or process? I don’t know.

Is it getting the job done in this instance? Yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/89 "2022-01-07T20:25:26Z")

</div>

You wrote this earlier (bolding mine):

> [@iamthewalrus\_3](#):
>
> Having to jump through absurd hoops and take extra flights **instead of having someone who is empowered (and encouraged) to say “Well, you filled out this form wrong, but obviously you were trying to do the right thing, so just fill out this new form and you can be on your way” is a policy choice that is being made on purpose and could be made otherwise.**

Sure; how many people are you willing to employ full-time to do that job? One per visa application, so everyone has a personal contact point? Who’s gonna pay for that?

You talk of “absurd hoops” but then offer absurd solutions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/90 "2022-01-07T20:32:40Z")

</div>

Rather than paying someone to review applications and try to reject them, we could pay someone to review them and try to help people fix them. We could also make the whole process less error prone. If we wanted to. Not doing so is a policy choice.

When rejected and you have to reapply, someone has to go through the application again. It’s a policy choice to force people to wait 2 weeks and submit through the mail rather than just fixing it right then.

It’s a little sad that “imagine a government bureaucrat who would help you fill out the form” instead of one with a big “REJECTED” stamp is seen as absurd. There are many organizations that manage to accomplish things effectively without perfect forms filled out in triplicate.

There are even government organizations that operate on this sort of principle (at least with respect to their own citizens). Unfortunately, as Americans we have little experience with that and assume that inefficient and inhumane government bureaucracy is a natural state of the world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RitterSport](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rittersport/32/6326_2.png) [@RitterSport](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RitterSport)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/91 "2022-01-07T20:40:19Z")

</div>

I would love to get this back on track to talk about Djokovic-specific info as it arises, or, lacking that, just laughing at him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/92 "2022-01-07T21:04:22Z")

</div>

> [@iamthewalrus\_3](#):
>
> I mean, either you have a legitimate medical exemption or you don’t, right?

My suspicion is that Djokovic get a visa based on an exemption but couldn’t provide required proof when he arrived at the border and that’s what screwed him up. But I could be wrong on that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gkster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gkster/32/14107_2.png) [@gkster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gkster)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 9:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/93 "2022-01-07T21:38:34Z")

</div>

> [@Aspidistra](#):
>
> Random fun fact, btw … I’m right now looking out my office window at the hotel where Djokovic is being kept - it’s about 100m down the street. Yesterday there was a certain amount of activity about as Djokovic supporters (about a dozen or so) mingled with some smart refugee activists taking the time to point out that in that very same hotel are refugees we’ve locked up for _eight fucking years_ and maybe it’s time we stopped doing that? All very civilised and respectful on both sides though.
> 
> No activity right now, but there are three policemen wandering about so if anything gets interesting later on I’ll let you all know 🙂

Interesting to hear a hyper-local report, keep us posted!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![peedin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peedin/32/14095_2.png) [@peedin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/peedin)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/94 "2022-01-07T21:44:41Z")

</div>

I can’t like this enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zakalwe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zakalwe/32/270_2.png) [@Zakalwe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zakalwe)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2022, 1:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/95 "2022-01-08T01:19:56Z")

</div>

> [@Broomstick](#):
>
> My suspicion is that Djokovic get a visa based on an exemption but couldn’t provide required proof when he arrived at the border and that’s what screwed him up. But I could be wrong on that.

This has been alluded to in the media (and is referenced above). He supposedly applied for an exemption based on having had COVID within the past 6 months (supply proof on arrival). On arrival, he had nothing (since he actually had COVID 18 months ago, not 6).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aspidistra](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aspidistra/32/3894_2.png) [@Aspidistra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aspidistra)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2022, 1:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/96 "2022-01-08T01:51:22Z")

</div>

By about lunchtime there were six police cars, eight police, two media photographers and a dozen very determined refugee advocates who kept up the chanting despite it bucketing down and all their signs being drenched (the police snagged the dry spot in the entranceway - smart!)

Absolutely nothing else of note happened.

Winners of the day - dry policefolk getting an easy shift + refugee advocates getting their cause in the paper for a second day running

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2022, 10:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/97 "2022-01-08T10:28:25Z")

</div>

Most recent news is that he is relying upon documentation that shows him having had Covid. This raises two questions for me  
a) is a previous infection sufficient to allow one into the country or the state? (I was under the impression that it wasn’t)  
b) Isn’t it very convenient that he was positive on Dec 16th and clear by the 30th? Call me cynical if you like.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2022, 11:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/98 "2022-01-08T11:01:56Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> Isn’t it very convenient that he was positive on Dec 16th and clear by the 30th? Call me cynical if you like.

Not really - that’s actually a plausible interval to clear the virus. But I have zero problem with another test being required to prove he’s negative.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2022, 11:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/99 "2022-01-08T11:07:07Z")

</div>

> [@Broomstick](#):
>
> Not really - that’s actually a plausible interval to clear the virus. But I have zero problem with another test being required to prove he’s negative.

My scepticism isn’t about the period to recover, more that the timing was perfect. Outside of the season but just in time to travel to Australia (he thinks).

If recent previous infection is an acceptable criteria then fine, he just needs to prove it in the same way as absolutely everyone else. Knowing the Aussie people I suspect they aren’t taking kindly to anyone assuming to be above the regulations that everyone else has to adhere to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2022, 11:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283/100 "2022-01-08T11:12:43Z")

</div>

Yes, well, I get that it’s convenient - but then, my covid isolation ended the day before my vacation time started. But I didn’t plan to get covid, and I asked for the time off a month and a half before I got covid. On the other hand, I had absolutely zero problem with providing legitimate documentation when requested. Not sure Mr Djokovic was as cooperative.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/djokovics-medical-exemption/957283.md?page=6)
