# DND OGL - Is anyone following this? Thoughts?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Tags:** rpg-dnd-wargames\
**Created:** [January 8, 2023, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886 "2023-01-08T18:54:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hogarth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hogarth/32/1773_2.png) [@hogarth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hogarth)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2023, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/161 "2023-01-14T23:39:45Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> LegalEagle weighs in

From a personal standpoint, I’m mostly interested in what the impact would be on Paizo and other commercial publishers, but neither this video nor the Opening Arguments podcast he refers to say much about that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garygnu](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garygnu/32/2924_2.png) [@garygnu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garygnu)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 12:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/162 "2023-01-15T00:30:06Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> > [@MrAtoz](#):
> >
> > I am a bad gamer (or I suppose, more accurately, an unusual gamer) in that, although I’ve been playing RPGs since college, and have run games at Gen Con for four or five years now, I’ve never actually played D&D itself.
> 
> Not bad, but, holy cow, unique is right. I don’t think I’ve ever met someone who plays RPGs who didn’t play D&D at some point in their life. I didn’t think it was possible.

I started RPGs with GURPS. D&D felt too restricted compared to that, so I never sought it out. I’m college, the RPG of choice was Vampire: The Masquerade. I’ve never had the opportunity to play D&D.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vislor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/vislor/32/5933_2.png) [@vislor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vislor)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 2:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/163 "2023-01-15T02:44:32Z")

</div>

> [@Acsenray](#):
>
> And there’s nothing that any rules system can do to prevent this, and even were it possible, I would still give the DM final say over es campaign. Bringing a character to a new DM necessarily involves negotiating details like this in order to fit the character in. It’s the DM’s game.

I guess I’m hoping you understand my side. It’s not just the DM’s game. The DM needs the players as they need the DM. Bad gaming is NOT better than no gaming at all.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Not really. In 3.0, the best bard builds used only a single bard level, because all of the music abilities depended only on your ranks in Perform, not on your bard level. So you’d dip Bard 1, and then rogue and sorcerer for whatever mix of skills and spells you wanted.

Ah, those are good points. There are later bardic abilities that grant bonuses to other abilities. I guess I’m lucky my players didn’t do that.

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> And now, in 5e, The Performance skill doesn’t really do much if anything for the Bard. This was- imho- an overreaction to that. (Of course 5e went through Pathfinders pockets for the loose change, but that is only fair).

Fair points. Plus it’s not as if skills improve that much.

> [@kenobi\_65](#):
>
> Hasbro bought WotC in 1999 (i.e., about a year prior to the launch of 3E). Yes, Hasbro owned WotC when 3E was launched, and when the original OGL was released (and I _never_ said, nor meant to imply, otherwise).
> 
> It was only a few years after their purchase of WotC (in 2002) when Hasbro decided that they didn’t want to be in the magazine business, and Paizo was created/spun out of WotC, originally to handle the magazines.

I apologize if I put words into your mouth. My point was more that Hasbro always knew about it. You had good points that WotC created Paizo when they wanted out of the magazine business.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Not really. In 3.0, the best bard builds used only a single bard level, because all of the music abilities depended only on your ranks in Perform, not on your bard level. So you’d dip Bard 1, and then rogue and sorcerer for whatever mix of skills and spells you wanted.

I got lucky that my players didn’t do that. Most multi classing they have done was at least due to concept of the character.

I apologize if I have offended or misconstrued anyone comments. I appreciate the discussion! Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 3:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/164 "2023-01-15T03:25:54Z")

</div>

> [@garygnu](#):
>
> I started RPGs with GURPS. D&D felt too restricted compared to that, so I never sought it out.

GURPS is great. But the combat that will take all sessions in GURPS? You can hammer out 4 D&D combats in the same time. Now, that is both good and bad. Is the combat the Thing? Or is it just an encounter on the way to the Thing? (Rescuing the princess, getting the MacGuffin, finding the guy who killed your family, whatever)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 4:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/165 "2023-01-15T04:56:16Z")

</div>

> [@garygnu](#):
>
> I started RPGs with GURPS. D&D felt too restricted compared to that, so I never sought it out. I’m college, the RPG of choice was Vampire: The Masquerade. I’ve never had the opportunity to play D&D.

The first time I ran through module I-6, Castle Ravenloft, we used GURPS. These days, my players would rather take a cheese grater to their faces than play GURPS.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 5:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/166 "2023-01-15T05:18:19Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> The first time I ran through module I-6, Castle Ravenloft, we used GURPS. These days, my players would rather take a cheese grater to their faces than play GURPS.

I have played many systems. No system works better than GURPs for low powered super heroes. Or really buffed humans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 5:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/167 "2023-01-15T05:30:27Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> I have played many systems. No system works better than GURPs for low powered super heroes. Or really buffed humans.

Once in a while I get to thinking, seriously, I think sometimes, and I’m sometimes amazed by games I used to play back in my youth that I simply don’t have the patience to play today. GURPS is a great tool set, but I just can’t be bothered to build my own settings using it. It’s not like I don’t have time, I’m at a point in my life where my career is established and my familial obligations are low, but I just can’t be bothered.

I tried playing Battletech again in 2019, a game I absolutely loved to play from the late 1980s until around 1999, and it was so damned slow and tedious that it pretty much dried up any interest I had in playing it. Wild centaurs couldn’t get me to play AD&D despite how much I enjoyed it when I was younger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 5:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/168 "2023-01-15T05:33:28Z")

</div>

> [@vislor](#):
>
> I apologize if I put words into your mouth. My point was more that Hasbro always knew about it. You had good points that WotC created Paizo when they wanted out of the magazine business.

No worries! My point was that this is now the second time that Paizo (which was birthed by WotC, and was originally largely staffed by former WotC employees) is now, for the second time, seeing WotC making a business decision which strikes at the heart of Paizo’s core business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 12:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/169 "2023-01-15T12:29:38Z")

</div>

> [@vislor](#):
>
> I guess I’m hoping you understand my side. It’s not just the DM’s game. The DM needs the players as they need the DM. Bad gaming is NOT better than no gaming at all.

There’s nothing about changing character stats to fit a particular DM’s game that is inherently bad. There’s also nothing inherently good about acceding to every stat that the player likes to have. It’s a negotiation in which the DM has final say. That might come out good or bad given the particular DM or the particular player or the particular negotiation, but the basic rule is that the DM’s judgment must rule.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vislor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/vislor/32/5933_2.png) [@vislor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vislor)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 3:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/170 "2023-01-15T15:01:12Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> The first time I ran through module I-6, Castle Ravenloft, we used GURPS. These days, my players would rather take a cheese grater to their faces than play GURPS.

In general, it seems that my players want a mix of role playing and combat. When we do have combat, my players, ranging from newer players to those who have played for decades, like the “tactics” of finding those extra bonuses. Flanking, sneaking, spells, or other items to give them that edge. PF1/LU have just enough of those to give that feeling without getting too much in the weeds.

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> I tried playing Battletech again in 2019, a game I absolutely loved to play from the late 1980s until around 1999, and it was so damned slow and tedious that it pretty much dried up any interest I had in playing it. Wild centaurs couldn’t get me to play AD&D despite how much I enjoyed it when I was younger.

Have you tried the Battletech game by HBS? I might scratch the itch of wanting to play and letting the computer do the tedious parts. Further, the ideas they had to make it a video game probably would be huge in the tabletop game. Not that I’m playing that or have any idea of the state of it now.

I spent thousands and thousands of hours, maybe dollars, on 1E/2E and there is no way I would play it, either. Or, as I have said, if I’m running it, it would be so modified as to not be that system anymore.

> [@kenobi\_65](#):
>
> No worries! My point was that this is now the second time that Paizo (which was birthed by WotC, and was originally largely staffed by former WotC employees) is now, for the second time, seeing WotC making a business decision which strikes at the heart of Paizo’s core business.

I agree and am really happy that Paizo is doing this!

Thanks for the replies!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vislor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/vislor/32/5933_2.png) [@vislor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vislor)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2023, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/171 "2023-01-15T21:35:53Z")

</div>

In case anyone hasn’t seen this group before:

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/JwiKr5m71WY/maxresdefault.jpg "Dungeons & Dragons: OGL Edition") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwiKr5m71WY)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vislor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/vislor/32/5933_2.png) [@vislor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vislor)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/172 "2023-01-20T00:24:51Z")

</div>

New OGL 1.2 was released.

> **[Starting the OGL ‘Playtest’](https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1432-starting-the-ogl-playtest)**
>
> Today, we're presenting a draft of OGL 1.2, and announcing a Creative Commons license that puts D&D's core mechanics into your hands.

Link to the actual doc in the article.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/173 "2023-01-20T00:42:20Z")

</div>

> [@vislor](#):
>
> New OGL 1.2 was released.
> 
> [https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1432-starting-the-ogl-playtest](https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1432-starting-the-ogl-playtest)

> > - **Protecting D&D’s inclusive play experience.** As I said above, content more clearly associated with D&D (like the classes, spells, and monsters) is what falls under the OGL. You’ll see that OGL 1.2 lets us act when offensive or hurtful content is published using the covered D&D stuff. We want an inclusive, safe play experience for everyone. This is deeply important to us, and OGL 1.0a didn’t give us any ability to ensure it.
> > - **TTRPGs and VTTs.** OGL 1.2 will only apply to TTRPG content, whether published as books, as electronic publications, or on virtual tabletops (VTTs). Nobody needs to wonder or worry if it applies to anything else. It doesn’t.
> > - **Deauthorizing OGL 1.0a.** We know this is a big concern. The Creative Commons license and the open terms of 1.2 are intended to help with that. One key reason why we have to deauthorize: We can’t use the protective options in 1.2 if someone can just choose to publish harmful, discriminatory, or illegal content under 1.0a. And again, any content you have already published under OGL 1.0a will still always be licensed under OGL 1.0a.
> > - **Very limited license changes allowed.** _Only_ two sections can be changed once OGL 1.2 is live: how you cite Wizards in your work and how we can contact each other. We don’t know what the future holds or what technologies we will use to communicate with each other, so we thought these two sections needed to be future-proofed.

Summary: a bunch of semantic bullshit by a company desperately trying to backpedal from a previous attempt to control players and block anyone providing alternative compatible content in an anti-competition measure.

Stranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/174 "2023-01-20T00:52:31Z")

</div>

> [@The OGL](#):
>
> We can’t use the protective options in 1.2 if someone can just choose to publish harmful, discriminatory, or illegal content under 1.0a. And again, any content you have already published under OGL 1.0a will still always be licensed under OGL 1.0a.

“We had to make this shameless cash grab for your intellectual property because it was the only way we could protect the queers and the brown people!”

Man, fuck you Hasbro. Don’t try to pin responsibility for this shit on me. As someone who doesn’t actually consume any WotC products, I’ve been mostly amused by this, but now I’m actually kind of pissed. I may have to start playing 5th edition just so I can quit in protest over how they’re handling this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 1:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/175 "2023-01-20T01:31:41Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> “We had to make this shameless cash grab for your intellectual property because it was the only way we could protect the queers and the brown people!”

I mean, was the Aryan Nations threatening to Kickstarter a “Peoples of Blood and Soil” campaign setting for 5E? This seems like it would be more of a Games Workshop type of problem.

Stranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 1:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/176 "2023-01-20T01:37:16Z")

</div>

Gary Gygax’s son has been pushing some rather disgustingly racist material, while trying to imply that it’s the real D&D, not like those imitators at Wizards of the Coast. And I’m not talking “Well, we didn’t intend that imagery to come across that way, and we’re removing that image, and apologizing”; I’m talking like “Negroids are like humans, except with penalties to all of their stats compared to normal humans”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/177 "2023-01-20T01:43:39Z")

</div>

Is he doing it under the existing OGL? No? Then my dog likes peanutbutter.

Stranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/178 "2023-01-20T01:44:22Z")

</div>

> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#):
>
> I mean, was the Aryan Nations threatening to Kickstarter a “Peoples of Blood and Soil” campaign setting for 5E? This seems like it would be more of a Games Workshop type of problem.

One company did use the OGL to put out blatantly racist content.

> **[Wizards Of The Coast Go After Space RPG Accused Of 'Racist And Transphobic...](https://kotaku.com/wizards-coast-star-frontiers-racist-trans-bigotry-suit-1849537890)**
>
> It's the latest battle in an ongoing legal war between WotC and TSR LLC

_The game in question is called Star Frontiers: New Genesis, which claims to be a refreshed version of one of TSR’s original role-playing games, but which has been the centre of a huge amount of controversy throughout the year. [You can catch up on some of the drama here in this Dicebreaker report](https://www.dicebreaker.com/companies/tsr-games/news/tsr-games-ernie-gygax-cut-ties), but suffice to say there has been some gross shit._

_For this suit, Wizards are citing stuff like an early build of Star Frontiers that was released in July, which contained text like:_

_\> …races in Star Frontiers NewGenesis are not unlike races in the real world. Some are better at certain things than others, and some races are superior than others…_

_The suit also cites documentation saying “a ‘negro’ race is described as a ‘Subrace’ in the game and as having ‘average’ intelligence with a maximum intelligence rating of 9, while the ‘norse’ race has a minimum intelligence rating of 13.”_

_“The game also refers to the Black Lives Matter movement as ‘radical’,” it continues, while adding “Star Frontiers New Genesis also contains offensive transphobic material: it includes a specific gender option for the characters ‘Male/Female no bonuses, and no Trans’.”_

And due to the old OGL, there wasn’t much WotC could do about it.

So yeah one company put out blatantly racist shit.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Gary Gygax’s son has been pushing some rather disgustingly racist material, while trying to imply that it’s the real D&D, not like those imitators at Wizards of the Coast. And I’m not talking “Well, we didn’t intend that imagery to come across that way, and we’re removing that image, and apologizing”; I’m talking like “Negroids are like humans, except with penalties to all of their stats compared to normal humans”.

Yep.

> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#):
>
> Summary: a bunch of semantic bullshit by a company desperately trying to backpedal from a previous attempt to control players and block anyone providing alternative compatible content in an anti-competition measure.

No, a bunch of semantic bullshit by a company desperately trying to stop blatant racism in a game using their system, and purporting to be the “real” D&D. Very reasonable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 1:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/179 "2023-01-20T01:45:22Z")

</div>

> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#):
>
> Is he doing it under the existing OGL? No? Then my dog likes peanutbutter.

Under the “old” OGL, yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886/180 "2023-01-20T01:56:33Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> One company did use the OGL to put out blatantly racist content.

That didn’t have anything to do with the OGL. It was a trademark dispute. The publishers of the new Star Frontiers game had acquired the TSR trademark, and thought that meant they had the rights to old TSR IP. They were wrong, those rights were still held by WotC.

Edit: I can’t find any info on how the case turned out, so it’s possible TSR LLC proved they did own the trademarks to Star Frontiers. Regardless, the case had nothing to do with the OGL, and no changes to the OGL would have prevented the Star Frontiers debacle.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dnd-ogl-is-anyone-following-this-thoughts/977886.md?page=10)
