# Do All Animals Get An Adjective?  (e.g. feline, bovine, canine...)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 28, 2008, 3:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180 "2008-04-28T03:38:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 3:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/1 "2008-04-28T03:38:13Z")

</div>

Many animals have an adjective attached to them that means “like this animal.” For instance, if someone exhibited a grace you would associate with a cat, you might call it “feline.” A man of extremely impressive size and bearing might be said to “have an almost ursine appearance,” meaning he’s a lot like a bear. I know these ones:

Cats - Feline  
Dogs - Canine  
Bears - Ursine  
Cattle - Bovine  
Sheep - Ovine  
Horses - Equine  
Foxes - Vulpine  
Wolves - Lupine  
Monkeys - Simian (not sure why it’s a different form)

My question is, do ALL types of animal have an adjective form? Is there a word like this for, say, snails, or are you stuck just calling them “snail-like”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 3:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/2 "2008-04-28T03:49:13Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=RickJay]  
Monkeys - Simian (not sure why it’s a different form)  
[/QUOTE]

Simian means ape, not monkey.

As for the other examples you’ve given, those are the Anglicized versions of the Latinate taxonomic mammalian classification. Most are families, but some are not. Snails would be Gastropods (from _Gastropoda_).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Gary\_T](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_T)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/3 "2008-04-28T04:40:21Z")

</div>

If you put the ones you know into Google’s search window, you can find lists like this:

aquiline - eagle  
assinine - donkey  
bovine - cattle  
cancrine - crab  
canine - dog  
cervine - deer  
corvine - crow  
equine - horse  
elapine - snake  
elaphine - deer  
feline - cat  
hircine - goat  
leonine - lion  
leporine - rabbit, hare  
lupine - wolf  
murine - rodent  
pavonine - peacock  
piscine - fish  
porcine - pig  
rusine - deer  
serpentine - snake  
ursine - bear  
vulpine - fox

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Askance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/askance/32/8281_2.png) [@Askance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Askance)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 4:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/4 "2008-04-28T04:47:30Z")

</div>

Not to forget:

turdine - thrush

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 5:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/5 "2008-04-28T05:46:23Z")

</div>

It’s probably legitimate to coin such words based on the genitive form of the genus name. Most of the ones on **Rick** ’s and **Gary** ’s lists are formed in that way, e.g., Bos -\> bovis -\> bovine; Elephas -\> elephantis -\> elephantine. I know “hominine” is quote often used in paleoanthropology to mean “of or relating to one of the forms in the human ancestral line (and offshoots).” So “tachyglossine” would mean “characteristic of echidnas”; “macropodine” would signify “characteristic of kangaroos”; “struthionine” likewise “of ostriches.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 6:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/6 "2008-04-28T06:49:45Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Gary T]  
assinine - donkey  
[/QUOTE]  
Really? Boy, the donkey sure gets it in the… well, you know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gymnopithys](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/fbc32d/32.png) [@Gymnopithys](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gymnopithys)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 11:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/7 "2008-04-28T11:53:39Z")

</div>

It’s _asinine_. So nothing to do with… you know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Meurglys](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/258eb7/32.png) [@Meurglys](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Meurglys)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 12:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/8 "2008-04-28T12:29:50Z")

</div>

My father was asking a couple of months ago what the term for ducks would be…?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 12:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/9 "2008-04-28T12:41:33Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Meurglys]  
My father was asking a couple of months ago what the term for ducks would be…?  
[/QUOTE]

Anatine, for ducks in general, I believe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Meurglys](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/258eb7/32.png) [@Meurglys](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Meurglys)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 1:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/10 "2008-04-28T13:27:30Z")

</div>

Thanks a lot!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psychonaut](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/psychonaut/32/4655_2.png) [@psychonaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/psychonaut)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/11 "2008-04-28T13:38:03Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=RickJay]  
My question is, do ALL types of animal have an adjective form?  
[/QUOTE]  
Define “type”. For certain definitions, the answer is no, of course not. There are probably millions of animal species, subspecies, breeds, etc.; surely they can’t all have their own unique adjectives. I doubt there are different adjectives for African and Indian elephants, for example. Even some more general taxons probably don’t have their own adjectives, at least in common parlance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 2:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/12 "2008-04-28T14:36:12Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=psychonaut]  
Define “type”. For certain definitions, the answer is no, of course not. There are probably millions of animal species, subspecies, breeds, etc.; surely they can’t all have their own unique adjectives. I doubt there are different adjectives for African and Indian elephants, for example. Even some more general taxons probably don’t have their own adjectives, at least in common parlance.  
[/QUOTE]

You’re probably right, but English is equipped to coin words that will be clearly understood, at least by the intended audience. To manufacture one on the spot, I’ll bet that nobody has ever had occasion to distinguish diurnal and nocturnal animals, taken together, from those active predominantly at dawn or sunset (“crepuscular” animals, paralleling “nocturnal animals” and “diurnal animals”), but the proper term would be _noncrepuscular._ Made up on the spot as an example, but would be instantly clear to anyone with an interest in animal behavior patterns.

In the event I were writing something for **Colibri, Darwin’s Finch** , and their colleagues, and wanted to refer to a characteristic of African elephants (and perhaps their extinct close relatives) not shared by their Indian cousins, the proper term would be _loxodontine_, from the genus name for African elephants.

As I noted above, English seems to have largely used -ine affixed to the stem of the genus name for this purpose-- two other useful related suffixes are _-id_ and _-oid_, both clipped from the “official” Latin endings for family and superfamily, _-idae_ and _-oidea_ respectively. To help clarify this, _canine_ would refer to characteristics of dogs, or possibly of dogs and their closest relatives (wolves, coyotes, the dingo, etc.); _canid_ would reference all doglike forms in Family Canidae, including the foxes, the jackal, and some peculiar South American and Southeast Asian forms most of us have probably never heard of; _canoid_ would reference the larger group of dogs, wolves, foxes, bears, raccoons, coatimundis, pandas, wolverines, weasels, skunks, and all their allies, in contradistinction to feloids such as the cats, the cheetah, the mongooses, the aardwolf, the hyenas, the fossa, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolf\_meister](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolf_meister/32/15202_2.png) [@wolf\_meister](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolf_meister)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 6:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/13 "2008-04-28T18:15:48Z")

</div>

By the way, the term for such words is **collateral adjectives**.  
That term does not necessarily apply just to animal adjectives though. For example, lunar is the collateral adjective for the Moon.  
There are no doubt many lists on the Internet of such words and this guy’s site

> **[David's World of Trivia](https://www.angelfire.com/mo/dotila/trivia.html)**
>
> Trivia

seems to have a good selection.  
You’ll have to scroll about ¾ of the way down to find the list.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mister\_Rik](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mister_rik/32/491_2.png) [@Mister\_Rik](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mister_Rik)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2008, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/14 "2008-04-28T18:29:24Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Gary T]  
aquiline - eagle  
[/QUOTE]

Well now that explains the phrase “he has an aquiline nose”. I’d always assumed that the phrase was a reference to the person in question having a nose like some historical figure named Aquila (Roman emperor?) whose nose was so distinctive that it became the basis of an adjective.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a9a28c/32.png) [@Blake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blake)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2010, 7:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/16 "2010-06-02T07:02:14Z")

</div>

> [@Polycarp](#):
>
> As I noted above, English seems to have largely used -ine affixed to the stem of the genus name for this purpose…

Not really, it’s more a case of taking the Latin words, which just happen to correspond to the Genus name for most common European animals. For other animals it doesn’t hold true. Most ducks are not of the genus _Anas_, most mice not from the genus \*Mus \*. In some cases, such as the hyaena, the genus name isn’t the Latin name at all, so the English adjective in hyenine, rather than the crocutine you would get if you affixed -ine to the genus.

The associated flaw with this derivation is that different species share the same genus. So for example if you wanted to describe something as being like a wallaby then, by your derivation, you would describe it as being macropodine, the word you use for describing something kangaroo-like. Of course this occurs because the Romans never had separate words for kangaroo and wallaby, or indeed any word.

Which brings us to the third flaw, which is that the word macropodine already means macropod-like rather than kangaroo like. So it refers to anything from the bettongs, wallbies and tree kangaroos through to the true kangaroos.

Sticking -ine at the end of the genus name works, but only if the genus name is also the Latin name and only if the genus is fairly narrow.

> [@](#):
>
> two other useful related suffixes are _-id_ and _-oid_, both clipped from the “official” Latin endings for family and superfamily, _-idae_ and _-oidea_ respectively.

Those are Greek terms with a rather specific meaning. They only correspond to taxonomic endings because they share the same Greek meaning. Both stem from the Greek eidos meaning shape. So saying that something is -oid means that it shares a similar shape, not a similar characteristic. For example, a boat might be referred to as [piscoid](http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/24000/Shark-Submarine--24062.jpg) or [cygnoid](http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/04/05/swan_boat_in_long_beach.jpg), but it would not usually be correct to refer to them as piscine or cygnine. Similarly a nose can be referred to as aquiline if it has shared characteristics with the nose of an eagle, but if you call it aquiloid you are saying that it is literally shaped like an entire eagle.

> [@](#):
>
> To help clarify this, _canine_ would refer to characteristics of dogs, or possibly of dogs and their closest relatives (wolves, coyotes, the dingo, etc.);

Which highlights the problem, because wolves and dogs share the same genus: _Canis_. However something wolf-like is lupine because the Romans had a different word for wolf: lupus.

> [@](#):
>
> _canoid_ would reference the larger group of dogs, wolves, foxes, bears, raccoons, coatimundis, pandas, wolverines, weasels, skunks, and all their allies, in contradistinction to feloids such as the cats, the cheetah, the mongooses, the aardwolf, the hyenas, the fossa, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2010, 10:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/17 "2010-06-02T10:53:25Z")

</div>

Thanks. But did you notice that this thread is somewhat zombesque?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2010, 11:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/18 "2010-06-02T11:38:27Z")

</div>

“Zombine”, surely?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2010, 11:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/19 "2010-06-02T11:52:02Z")

</div>

“Zombine” sounds like a psychoactive substance which induces a craving for braaaaains!

(That, or a procrastinator’s ice-clearing machine, used 18 months after it was needed.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2010, 12:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/20 "2010-06-02T12:00:14Z")

</div>

“Zombified” would work too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SGT42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b9e5f3/32.png) [@SGT42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SGT42)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2010, 1:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180/21 "2010-06-02T13:37:30Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Simian means ape, not monkey.  
> .

Simius in Latin means both monkey and ape. By the way, English is, to my knowledge, the only language that has a separate word for ape. In Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, French and German, there is only one word to designate both types of primates.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-animals-get-an-adjective-e-g-feline-bovine-canine/447180.md?page=2)
