# Do all languages have something similar to alphabetical order?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [September 24, 2011, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430 "2011-09-24T03:59:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Balthisar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/balthisar/32/2825_2.png) [@Balthisar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Balthisar)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 2:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/21 "2011-09-25T02:55:36Z")

</div>

I’m not in the mood just this instant, but one would put a bunch of Chinese words into Excel, sort them, and see what happens.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bag\_of\_Mostly\_Water](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bag_of_mostly_water/32/1029_2.png) [@Bag\_of\_Mostly\_Water](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bag_of_Mostly_Water)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/22 "2011-09-25T03:10:58Z")

</div>

> [@Balthisar](#):
>
> I’m not in the mood just this instant, but one would put a bunch of Chinese words into Excel, sort them, and see what happens.

I suspect they would be sorted in the order of the Unicode values of the characters which make up the words.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cckerberos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@cckerberos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cckerberos)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 4:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/23 "2011-09-25T04:17:37Z")

</div>

> [@Ex\_Chemist](#):
>
> I suspect they would be sorted in the order of the Unicode values of the characters which make up the words.

Nope. I suspect the program remembers what you typed to get the character and orders them according to that.

I inputted the following:

1. 大 (by typing oo)
2. 大 (by typing dai)
3. 先 (by typing saki)

Excel correctly sorted them 1, 3, 2.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Derleth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Derleth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Derleth)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/24 "2011-09-25T04:42:11Z")

</div>

> [@digs](#):
>
> When I taught in Fujian Province, whenever we had a fire drill, I used to yell: “好，大家根据您的母亲的联盟 社会安全号” (very rusty–probably mistakes)
> 
> Which meant: “Okay, everyone line up according to mother’s Social Security number!”

Computer translation is fun:

Google Translate renders this as “Well, everyone depending on your social security number, mother’s Alliance”, which likely means you aren’t very rusty at all, given the sad state of Chinese-to-English translation in modern automated systems.

The larger question is, why would people know their mother’s social security number offhand?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psychonaut](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/psychonaut/32/4655_2.png) [@psychonaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/psychonaut)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 5:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/25 "2011-09-25T05:47:06Z")

</div>

> [@cckerberos](#):
>
> Nope. I suspect the program remembers what you typed to get the character and orders them according to that.
> 
> I inputted the following:
> 
> 1. 大 (by typing oo)
> 2. 大 (by typing dai)
> 3. 先 (by typing saki)
> 
> Excel correctly sorted them 1, 3, 2.

I doubt it. How you type the character isn’t stored by any program I’m aware of, and certainly isn’t something inherent to standard character encodings like UTF-8. If Excel happens to store this information, then it’s going to give you different sorting results from files produced with Excel and those imported from another format (such as CSV).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cckerberos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@cckerberos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cckerberos)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 6:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/26 "2011-09-25T06:36:16Z")

</div>

> [@psychonaut](#):
>
> I doubt it. How you type the character isn’t stored by any program I’m aware of, and certainly isn’t something inherent to standard character encodings like UTF-8. If Excel happens to store this information, then it’s going to give you different sorting results from files produced with Excel and those imported from another format (such as CSV).

Okay. So how does Excel correctly differentiate 大 (oo) and 大 (dai) for alphabetization purposes?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 6:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/27 "2011-09-25T06:37:26Z")

</div>

> [@cckerberos](#):
>
> Nope. I suspect the program remembers what you typed to get the character and orders them according to that.
> 
> I inputted the following:
> 
> 1. 大 (by typing oo)
> 2. 大 (by typing dai)
> 3. 先 (by typing saki)
> 
> Excel correctly sorted them 1, 3, 2.

Interesting. I just used [The Alphabetizer](http://alphabetizer.flap.tv/index.php) to sort that list (I used C&P) and got 3, 1, 2. I’ve been using that site for a couple of years to sort Korean words in hangeul and it’s never been incorrect (using the current South Korean sorting order).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cckerberos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@cckerberos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cckerberos)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 6:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/28 "2011-09-25T06:43:41Z")

</div>

> [@Monty](#):
>
> Interesting. I just used [The Alphabetizer](http://alphabetizer.flap.tv/index.php) to sort that list (I used C&P) and got 3, 1, 2. I’ve been using that site for a couple of years to sort Korean words in hangeul and it’s never been incorrect (using the current South Korean sorting order).

Excel does the same if you C&P the three characters into it. It’s something in the typing that seems to make the difference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psychonaut](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/psychonaut/32/4655_2.png) [@psychonaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/psychonaut)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 7:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/29 "2011-09-25T07:15:01Z")

</div>

> [@cckerberos](#):
>
> Okay. So how does Excel correctly differentiate 大 (oo) and 大 (dai) for alphabetization purposes?

Are you sure it does? That is, have you constructed a test case which eliminates the possibility that you got the correct result through chance, or through some other dependent condition?

The two characters you’ve posted have exactly the same Unicode point, so if they were copied and pasted from this web page into any spreadsheet program (including Excel), it would have no way of knowing which was which.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cckerberos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@cckerberos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cckerberos)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 8:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/30 "2011-09-25T08:22:54Z")

</div>

> [@psychonaut](#):
>
> Are you sure it does? That is, have you constructed a test case which eliminates the possibility that you got the correct result through chance, or through some other dependent condition?

Yep. I’ve tried a number of different things, yet never had fail to produce the expected result. Most notably, I made a more elaborate test using 7 different pronunciations for the character 生. Excel correctly sorted them into the order ikiru, umu, ki, sho, sei, nama, hae.

> [@](#):
>
> The two characters you’ve posted have exactly the same Unicode point, so if they were copied and pasted from this web page into any spreadsheet program (including Excel), it would have no way of knowing which was which.

Indeed 🙂 (that was my point in my last post).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Balthisar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/balthisar/32/2825_2.png) [@Balthisar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Balthisar)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 12:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/31 "2011-09-25T12:03:15Z")

</div>

Okay, I get 3, 1, 2, in Excel, too, which is a combination of Unicode and a quick sorting algorithm. To be fair I tried to set the language to Chinese, but apparently I don’t have the proofing tools for Chinese installed, so there’s that. Hanzi was C&P’d from this thread directly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 2:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/32 "2011-09-25T14:09:01Z")

</div>

> [@Derleth](#):
>
> Computer translation is fun:
> 
> Google Translate renders this as “Well, everyone depending on your social security number, mother’s Alliance”, which likely means you aren’t very rusty at all, given the sad state of Chinese-to-English translation in modern automated systems.
> 
> The larger question is, why would people know their mother’s social security number offhand?

Of course they would if they were always sorted that way. Which seems likely.

In my HS, there were two kids born on the same date with the same first, middle, and last names. They were sorted by the name of the street they lived on. Suppose one moved?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AWB](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/bb73d2/32.png) [@AWB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AWB)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 2:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/33 "2011-09-25T14:37:25Z")

</div>

> [@Borzo](#):
>
> Hrmm such an interesting observation that I’ve never thought much of.
> 
> Number have to be in order, because it’s a part of their definition. But letters… have no real reason to be in any sort of “order”.

Steven Wright once pondered: Why is the alphabet in that order? Is it because of that stupid song?

> [@Borzo](#):
>
> Except for making a list of letters perhaps… but I can’t think of any reason to do so hundreds/thousands of years ago. Why would letters have to have been sortable a thousand years ago?

Joking aside, I believe letters doubled as numbers (besides Roman numerals). So then, the numeric order carried over as the alphabetic order.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wendell\_Wagner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/8491ac/32.png) [@Wendell\_Wagner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wendell_Wagner)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2011, 3:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/34 "2011-09-25T15:20:15Z")

</div>

Here’s the Wikipedia article about how alphabetical order works in various countries:

> **[Collation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collating_sequence)**
>
> Collation is the assembly of written information into a standard order. Many systems of collation are based on numerical order or alphabetical order, or extensions and combinations thereof. Collation is a fundamental element of most office filing systems, library catalogs, and reference books.
> Collation differs from classification in that the classes themselves are not necessarily ordered. However, even if the order of the classes is irrelevant, the identifiers of the classes may be members of a...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quercus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/7ab992/32.png) [@Quercus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quercus)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2011, 1:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/35 "2011-09-26T13:53:13Z")

</div>

Just noting that Spanish\* just (as in 2010) changed its sorting rules for ll and ch. They used to be considered one letter (‘ll’ followed ‘l’ in the alphabet, so ‘ly…’ came before ‘lla…’ in alphabetical order), but are now considered two letters for alphabetical order purposes.

- That is, an international association of Spanish language organizations, which presumably libraries and such accept the guidance of .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Floater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/dc4da7/32.png) [@Floater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Floater)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2011, 3:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/36 "2011-09-26T15:15:00Z")

</div>

> [@AWB](#):
>
> Joking aside, I believe letters doubled as numbers (besides Roman numerals). So then, the numeric order carried over as the alphabetic order.

Nope, the Latin alphabet is derived from the Greek, which in its turn has its roots in the Phoenician alphabet and the order was there already from the beginning.

Anyway, sorting is not as straightforward as one might think it is. For instance, how do you sort numbers? 1, 2, 3, 11, 22, 33 … or 1, 11, 2, 22, 3, 33 …? Do you want to omit leading definite and indefinite articles etc? I once sat in a working group to decide about a standard for sorting (in Sweden). There were people from various fields (I represented libraries) and in the end we came to the conclusion that is was impossible to have a standardised way of sorting as we all had our different traditions and needs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2011, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430/37 "2011-09-26T15:37:29Z")

</div>

> [@Sunspace](#):
>
> In Chinese they group characters by number of strokes of the pen required to create them. I’m not sure how they arrange the characters inside each group, though.

I’ve forgotten, but they definitely order them by number of strokes. It may go by stroke order within groups. They write the strokes in a certain order and this may determine “alphabetical” order.

Or they can use Pinyin.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-all-languages-have-something-similar-to-alphabetical-order/597430.md?page=1)
