Do bugs have emotions?

But do insects have subjective awareness? If they feel ‘fear’, is it unpleasant?

My understanding is that if you physically damage an insect they do not react the way that a self aware creature capable of suffering would react. Insects will attempt to walk on broken legs for example. A mammal wouldn’t do that.

Questions about what other organisms (even other human organisms, when you get right down to it) feel are unanswerable. All that you can answer is how they act. And insects do act in a way to attempt to avoid damage to themselves.

There’s a whole continuum of complexity of animal reactions to stimuli. I don’t think it’s useful to set some threshold and say that reactions below some level of complexity somehow don’t count.

Is subjective awareness a requirement for emotions?

Seems like the first thing to do to answer the op is to define the word emotion.

Could you imagine aliens saying the same about us?

That’s because most of the things insects do aren’t controled by the “brain”, which is only very roughly analogus to the vertebrate brain. (BTW, if you want to know way more than you want to know about mushroom bodies, click this.)
Myself, I suspect that there is far too little machine there to have a ghost in it.

Fly training experiment (implies reward (which could possibly imply pleasure)):

Even if they’re programmed, we are conscious of these reactions and we dislike or like them. That’s what make them emotions. Does the roach dislike it, when we remove the rock it was hiding under?

I was pondering a similar question: does a spider get angry if one destroys its web (in particular the intricately-crafted webs)?

I’m with Chronos and Raft on this one. This is a fantastic question, but a satisfying answer is probably still far off on the horizon because

  1. emotions are not particularly well understood yet, or even particularly well studied

  2. what emotions refer to isn’t even particularly well defined

  3. subjective experience goes almost to the core of what is particularly difficult to study

What we can say, is that even life forms which often get dismissed or ignored as simple may have some kind of rich complex inner life (“Secret lives of Trees”) or collective behavior vague analogues (social insects)

Most likely they have some very simplified version of emotions, with much less variety but much greater relative intensity

Ack, I am ashamed

I knew Descartes had never married, how did I fall for that clickbait?

[Bart Simpson]
If they don’t, I’ve wasted a lot of my life.
[/Bart Simpson]

Happens to us all, shunta lost my temper, sorry! AFAICT from this French source, Descartes definitely did conduct some vivisection experiments on live animals as well as dissecting a lot of animal cadavers and fetuses and observing some human cadaver dissections, although I can’t find an online version of his unfinished work Traité de l’homme that presumably contains more of the details.

The vivisection experiment mentioned in your link, carried out on [warning: explicit description of cruelty to animals] a dog whose paws were nailed down, appears to be borrowed from accounts of the notorious 19th-century vivisector Francois Magendie:

:smiley: