Are there some people who are too quick to ascribe higher thinking and deep emotions to animals? Sure.
But I think the cynics are making an elementary mistake: they’re looking at the conditions enjoyed by dogs in modern America, and assuming those conditions have been typical of human-canine relations through history.
Sure, TODAY, a poodle in Beverly Hills, a beagle in Plano, or a pug in Marblehead has it made, in Darwinian terms. Modern American dogs are well fed, pampered and spoiled, and are rarely expected to do very much except look cute.
But to put it mildly, that has NOT been the case for most dogs over the past hundred thousand years! TODAY, we have so much food and money that we don’t mind wasting some of it on an animal that doesn’t give us anything but pleasure and affection. But a caveman, a peasant farmer or a medieval shepherd didn’t have that luxury. For them, food was usually in short supply, and starvation was always a very real possibility. If they chose to give food to dogs, rest assured it was NOT because the doggies were cuddly, did cute tricks, and gave that adorable, quizzical look! They gave food to dogs because the dogs gave them valuable services in exchange.
For thousands of years, dogs had to earn their keep, and earn it they did. A border collie in the Scottish Highlands 500 years ago worked extremely hard, and was worth every morsel his master gave him. That dogs was NOT thinking, “Boy, have I got it made! These stupid humans are giving me free lunch!” He thought of himself as part of a large extended pack that included himself, a few other dogs, and his human masters, and he thought his pack was engaged in a great team effort that he was part of.
Now, do wolves in the wild show affection to other wolves in their packs? Indeed they do. Practically ALL wild canines show affection toward other pack members, and engage in play with them.
So, assuming a modern beagle thinks of his human owners as part of his pack, why WOULDN’T he occasionally show affection for them?
No, we needn’t pretend that the dog is an intellectual giant, nor should we assume a dog is capable of every grand feeling we experience. But there’s no compelling reason to doubt that a dog’s simple emotions are sincere.