# Do Peer-Reviewed papers exists supporting skepticism of "man-made" global warming alarm? **URL:** \ **Category:** The BBQ Pit\ **Created:** [June 24, 2010, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420 "2010-06-24T23:25:44Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 224
**Author:** ![Poptech](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/poptech/32/7292_2.png) [@Poptech](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Poptech)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2010, 3:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420/224 "2010-06-29T15:50:03Z")
> [@GIGObuster](#): > > BTW it seems that our own \*\*jshore \*\*was one of the writers of the rebuttal to the original paper being discussed now (For those that did not see it, he also showed to Poptech that he had no clue regarding basic statistics), so as jshore showed in the last discussion, it is clear that the makers of the list in the OP do not care at all if they continue to list discredited or debunked papers. He hasn’t shown me anything. Why you keep repeating these smears I have no idea. None of the papers are discredited or have been debunked outside of your repetition of these talking points. None of the authors of any of the papers on the list have conceded to any comments on their papers and no retraction of any of the papers has been made. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420)._