# Do Peer-Reviewed papers exists supporting skepticism of "man-made" global warming alarm? **URL:** \ **Category:** The BBQ Pit\ **Created:** [June 24, 2010, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420 "2010-06-24T23:25:44Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 226
**Author:** ![Poptech](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/poptech/32/7292_2.png) [@Poptech](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Poptech)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2010, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420/226 "2010-06-29T15:56:31Z")
> [@GIGObuster](#): > > As mentioned before, the shoe of the tactics being used does fit as the MIT science reported showed. This BTW is a key point in this discussion IMHO. I could also say that proponents of homeopathy use the same tactics but that does not mean that they are creationists. The alarmist hack who wrote that piece has only demonstrated his knack for propaganda. Bringing up the non-science of creationism is a sign of intellectual dishonesty as I have made no mention of it and have no association with them. > [@GIGObuster](#): > > The groups behind virtually all the cites you brought regarding the “whitewash” of the CRU hack scandal have declared or heavily implied that scientists are involved in a conspiracy. Could you provide these groups position statement on this issue to support this unfounded allegation, thanks. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420)._