# Do Peer-Reviewed papers exists supporting skepticism of "man-made" global warming alarm?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 24, 2010, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420 "2010-06-24T23:25:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 246

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Poptech](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/poptech/32/7292_2.png) [@Poptech](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Poptech)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2010, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420/246 "2010-06-29T18:24:22Z")

</div>

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> Go back and read the post that set you off.
> 
> It pointed out specific tactics that different people use to attack ideas. Creationists use those tactics. Conspiracy Theorists use those tactics. As nearly as several of us can tell, you have been using the same tactics. Creationism and CT are not part of this thread, but your particular approach to the topic and the direct analogue between your behavior and the behavior of those other groups is very much pertinent to this discussion.

I did and it is nothing but propaganda as I have not used any such “tactics” despite you claiming I have.

I am disappointed to see this same juvenile level of debate here and the desperate need to attempt to associate skeptics with creationists and conspiracy theorists. I was hoping for some level of intellectual honesty, I guess I asked for to much.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-peer-reviewed-papers-exists-supporting-skepticism-of-man-made-global-warming-alarm/544420)._
