jtur88:
I never said “randomly”.
My apologies. How do you suggest these test subjects be selected?
Particularly the human test subjects you mentioned.
jtur88:
Again, sensitivity trumps science. There are many things that could be established by science, but various antivivesectionist leagues intervene.
Electrodes could bed hooked up to test subjects, and then the readings observed remotely when they feel extreme pain. Then blow the subjects up and compare the electrode impulses. However. such a test has never been administered by legitimate science, because the politically correct number of test subjects (both human and mammalian) consistently wallows in the zero range.
Moderator Note
While perhaps meant as a joke (although one in extremely bad taste), this verges on trolling. jtur88 , given your previous warnings I would suggest you steer well clear of making more such posts.
jtur88:
I never said “randomly”.
This being the case, let’s drop the hijack.
Colibri
General Questions Moderator