# Do we have a thread for SlackerInc yet? Maybe we should

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-we-have-a-thread-for-slackerinc-yet-maybe-we-should/825461>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [December 2, 2018, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-we-have-a-thread-for-slackerinc-yet-maybe-we-should/825461 "2018-12-02T20:21:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 153

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2019, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-we-have-a-thread-for-slackerinc-yet-maybe-we-should/825461/153 "2019-08-03T15:12:11Z")

</div>

Actually, Great Antibob, it wasn’t that post I was referring to. It was this one:

> [@Is MRA/pick-up artist/incel "biological psychology" necessarily........wrong?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-mra-pick-up-artist-incel-biological-psychology-necessarily-wrong/837132/98):
>
> Incels and especially the red pill crowd do not deserve to be defended. They are truly horrible people. But evolutionary psychology does needs to be defended. That’s not to say that every finding ever produced in that field is airtight, any more than this is the case in the rest of psychology. But there is a lot of validity to that line of inquiry even if hardcore feminists and social scientists abhor the implications.

But let’s look at the full context of the post you so selectively quoted:

> [@Science says Incels are right about everything. What happens next?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/science-says-incels-are-right-about-everything-what-happens-next/837677/445):
>
> Incels and red pillers are not operating from a reasonable scientific perspective. They are way way off. But their ideological opposites, ardent feminists coming from a “woke” social science perspective, are equally far off from the truth in the other direction (although at least their hearts are closer to being in the right place). Bothsidesism can be a copout, but in this case it is highly applicable.

:dubious:

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-we-have-a-thread-for-slackerinc-yet-maybe-we-should/825461)._