Do you believe in anything that's paranormal?

Well, just as “alternative medicine” with actual evidence of efficacy is known as “medicine”, if “paranormal” events were real they would be accessible to the scientific method.

But the bigger point is that you seem to be infected with the widespread misconception that scientists have an agenda to reject evidence that seems to contradict the current orthodoxy. It’s true that scientists are methodologically skeptical, but that’s not the same thing at all. Science has achieved such remarkable advances in the last few centuries by using methods that can reliably distinguish real anomalies (that may lead to new science) from wishful thinking and bullshit. Real anomalies that stand up to careful scrutiny are exciting and fascinating to scientists.

I don’t know that I would say real so much as exists and awaiting explanation.

  1. Ghosts. I never really believed when I was younger but since we have one my opinion has changed. Not totally; there could be a explanation we just haven’t found yet. But something odd is happening somewhere.

  2. Aliens. I am sure there are some somewhere but I’m not all that willing to accept they have visited us or that they would have some sort of anal fixation.

  3. Bigfoot. Something remaining in the ocean undetected (coelacanth) I can buy. Small and medium mammals in the jungles of Indonesia; sure. Something that large and living in Pennsylvania undetected? Much less to say the least.

  4. ESP and related form of magic. When James Randi, or say Penn & Teller, says yes they accept it, I’ll probably believe it. Or not. Especially if its Teller saying it.

No, I do not.

Still enjoy listening to Coast-to-Coast AM though.

This completely changes the question. I’m confident there is weird and unexplained stuff. But that doesn’t make it somehow out of the realm of reality.

Perhaps I’m using the term synonymously with “Supernatural” for better or worse.

Heh, in a fiction story I wrote a psychic character specifically objected to psychic powers being called “paranormal” because she didn’t believe they defied science or physics, despite their mechanics remaining unexplained.

If we found the causes and mechanisms behind psychic powers, like say figuring out how to mass-produce machine-based telekinesis to make an affordable flying car, I think calling it paranormal would probably fall out of favor on its own, simply because it wouldn’t be non-normal anymore. This probably applies to anything that can be replicated and normalized.

Contrariwise, I think the term “supernatural” could have legs as becoming the common descriptor for entities from the otherworldly dimension ghosts normally chill in, presuming there is such a place. But ‘paranormal’ seems to exclude itself from being applied to common and commonly understood things by its very nature.

I’m conventionally religious, so by definition, I believe in numerous things that SDMB non-theists find preposterous.

But apart from God/Jesus, I’m extremely skeptical about the supernatural, and take none of it seriously.

I used to post, as a joke, that we have been visited by aliens in the past and they put signs up all over the Solar System warning others to stay away from the insane asylum on the third planet.

I think there is a possibility we have been visited in the past. I think there is a possibility they might come back, or someone new does. I just hope they won’t look at us as a food source.

I wonder if he really doesn’t have anything on under that! :wink:

Ditto.