[QUOTE=Der Trihs]
Ah, one of the standard lines used to handwave aside criticisms of nonsense like ghosts, psychic powers, and God. The people who want evidence of something that so totally contradicts what we know of the world are all bad people. They can’t possibly be dismissive because it’s an idea that’s logically inconsistant or violates known physical laws - they are True Believers in anti-ghostism or whatever who will deny any and all evidence. Instead of being skeptics who are dismissive of such beliefs because there’s never been any evidence for them to reject.
This is simply another example of a “jealous phenomenon”; something that convieniently only appears in front of people who already believe in it. And as such things always are, it’s garbage - real oddball events don’t carefully avoid skeptics and chase people who are believers.
[/QUOTE]
Piffle.
You are not even responding to what I posted. My point was that those who are demanding some sort of proof on this message board are never going to be satisfied with evidence posted to this message board. I have not interfered in any questions or alternative theories (including insanity) directed toward meenie7, only asking, at one point, that the discussion not take a personal turn.
You appear to be so determined to make “your side” of the “argument” that you are responding with a rote text based on a few key word triggers, not on the actual posts as submitted.
I do not find meenie7’s anecdotes credible, but I see no reason to step outside normal civility to attack personal reminiscences that originated in IMHO, just because they were tossed over the wall to GD. Had meenie7 opened a GD thread announcing that skeptics were fools because she had proof that ghosts wander among us, I would have moved the barrier for personal challenges back a bit, but that is not how this thread has played.
