# Do You Have A "Right" To A Driver's License?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 4, 2005, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025 "2005-01-04T14:08:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jake\_the\_Plumber](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/5daacb/32.png) [@Jake\_the\_Plumber](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jake_the_Plumber)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2005, 3:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/21 "2005-01-05T15:40:39Z")

</div>

One thing that continues to amuse me is the complete lack of licensing and oversight for boats. Anyone over the age of 13 can pilot most small watercraft in most areas.

But I digress. Unless I missed something, there was never anything introduced into the Constitution or Bill of Rights that makes driving a right, any more than flying an airplane is a right.

(see how I worked in two opposite ends of the stick - small watercraft vs. private aircraft)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anaamika](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Anaamika](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anaamika)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2005, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/22 "2005-01-05T16:14:18Z")

</div>

I used to think very strictly that driving was only a privilege. But it came to me how difficult it is to live in this country without a licence. You can’t get to work, you can’t do anything, pick up your kids, anything. I have reconsidered my position.

Driving is a necesity these days. I’m not sure where to go from here, though. If you punish someone by taking away their license and tell them they owe a fine, they’re going to drive anyway to get to work to make up the money for the fine. So we get stuck between a rock and a hard place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Redwing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/dfb087/32.png) [@Redwing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Redwing)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2005, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/23 "2005-01-05T21:24:18Z")

</div>

You have a right to a state issued ID card. You don’t have a right a driver’s license.

What annoys me, is that ID cards are seen by many establishments as less valid than driver’s licenses, and that there is no legal equivalence. 65% of driver’s licenses are produced by one company, and the difference between an ID and a DL is one of printed text on the card. These cards are no more easily forged than a DL.

disclaimer: I work for [Digimarc ID Systems](http://www.digimarc.com/secureid/services/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ms2001](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ms2001/32/18463_2.png) [@Ms2001](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ms2001)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2005, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/24 "2005-01-05T21:40:36Z")

</div>

> [@Martin Hyde](#):
>
> I think you might realize how little sense your response made if you’d have quoted the entirety of my post. I didn’t make the certification comment in a void, and thus I won’t respond to your post which seems to assume I did.

Believe it or not, I read all three lines of your post, including the one I didn’t quote, and my response was written after considering them all. Your point seems to be that the certification requirement makes driving a “privilege” while voting remains a “right” because… voting is mentioned in the Constitution? You didn’t strike me as the kind of person who would think the Constitution creates, rather than protects, rights.

As for stretching the definition of “right” - I don’t think it’s much of a stretch at all. Anyone who meets the qualifications _will_ be granted a driver’s license, and it can’t be taken away except through well-defined legal processes. The word “privilege” implies that it can be revoked at any time by random whim, IMO, and I’m not the only one in this thread who goes by that definition.

> [@Duke](#):
>
> “Privileges” are different, because you must qualify for them through a test of skill, knowledge, and aptitude. Driving is one such privilege: you have to pass a driving test to receive a driver’s license. To continue to have the license, you must continue to demonstrate skill, knowledge, and aptitude–namely, by not breaking the laws of the traffic code, and, in some states, by periodically re-passing certain tests.

But isn’t that the point of having a voting age - a roundabout way to test voters for knowledge and aptitude? The idea is that adults have something minors lack that makes them good voters, and since we can’t test that quality directly, we draw a line based on their age, which is easy to measure.

> [@](#):
>
> Want a final test of whether driving is a privilege or a right? Next time you get pulled over and the cop asks you for your driver’s license, tell him you don’t need one because “driving is a right.” Press your case vigorously. And when you get to the jail, make sure to call me so I can post the subsequent article on Fark under “hilarity ensues.”

I’m not sure what this is supposed to prove. If you try to vote without having registered, and you say you don’t need to register because “voting is a right”, you won’t be any more successful. If you try to carry a concealed weapon without getting a permit (where applicable), and you say you don’t need one because “bearing arms is a right”… well, you get the picture. Doesn’t mean those things aren’t rights, only that there are restrictions on who is allowed to exercise those rights and how, and bureaucracy in place to let the government keep track of it all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xema](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/9de053/32.png) [@Xema](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Xema)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2005, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/25 "2005-01-06T03:40:58Z")

</div>

> [@Duke](#):
>
> And when you get to the jail, make sure to call me so I can post the subsequent article on Fark under “hilarity ensues.”

You made some good points in your post. But (and forgive me if I’ve taken this the wrong way) you weaken them with this comment, which seems to come across as snide.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/i_love_me_vol.i/32/521_2.png) [@I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/I_Love_Me_Vol.I)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2005, 4:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/26 "2005-01-06T04:32:24Z")

</div>

Would it be fair to say that you have the right to be licensed to drive in the USA provided you meet the requirements? In this way it is almost just like voting. To vote, you have to fulfill certain requirements (be 18, not be a felon, for example). The difference being that to drive you have to prove a certain minimal proficiency and knowlege of driving. To vote you need not do such a thing (though sometimes I wish there was a civics test for voting).

Golly gee, on preview it seems others have already said the same thing more or less.

Well, count me in anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e8c25b/32.png) [@Duke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duke)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2005, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/27 "2005-01-06T13:58:36Z")

</div>

> [@Xema](#):
>
> You made some good points in your post. But (and forgive me if I’ve taken this the wrong way) you weaken them with this comment, which seems to come across as snide.

No, you’re quite right. I was very much too snarky there, and I apologize to **Mr2001** for that. It’s been a busy last couple days for me, and I promise to respond to his points later this evening.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clothahump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/51bf81/32.png) [@Clothahump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clothahump)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2005, 3:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/28 "2005-01-06T15:03:59Z")

</div>

It is a privilege.

In Texas: **Operating a motor vehicle is a privilege. If this privilege is abused by violating Texas traffic laws it may result in driver’s license suspension or revocation.**

[Cite](http://www.statedrivinglaw.com/texas-driving-law.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a5b964/32.png) [@Bill\_H](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_H)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2005, 3:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/29 "2005-01-07T03:50:16Z")

</div>

When did the words “right” and “privilege” become mutually exclusive?

Mirriam Webster is pretty clear they’re not:

> [@](#):
>
> Right  
> 2 : something to which one has a just claim: as a : the power or privilege to which one is justly entitled b (1) : the interest that one has in a piece of property – often used in plural \<mineral rights\> (2) plural : the property interest possessed under law or custom and agreement in an intangible thing especially of a literary and artistic nature \<film rights of the novel\>  
> 3 : something that one may properly claim as due
> 
> Privilege  
> : a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, advantage, or favor : PREROGATIVE; especially : such a right or immunity attached specifically to a position or an office

The saying “driving is a right, not a privilege” is the sort of thing that mothers tell their teenage kids, because it sounds good and conveys the true message that if you don’t drive well, you won’t be able to drive. Which is true and an important point.

But that doesn’t mean the statement itself is true, or even logical. And in fact it is neither.

In fact, let’s look in the Thesaurus:

> [@](#):
>
> right  
> 2 something to which one has a just claim \<the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness\>  
> Synonyms appanage, birthright, perquisite, prerogative, privilege
> 
> privilege  
> Text: Synonyms RIGHT 2, appanage, birthright, perquisite, prerogative

What’s that? Right is a synonym for privilege, and privilege for right.

Driving is both a right and a privilege. To deny that it is a right is to not understand the meaning of the word.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tnetennba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7993a0/32.png) [@tnetennba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tnetennba)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2005, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/30 "2005-01-07T04:42:58Z")

</div>

> [@Bill H.](#):
>
> Driving is both a right and a privilege. To deny that it is a right is to not understand the meaning of the word.

You’re confusing non-legal meanings of the words with specific legal meanings. Which isn’t to say they have hard, fast, and mutually exclusive meanings, but the driving issue is one case which is very clear. My right to free speech, religion, and so on do not require permission or licenses of any kind. Driving DOES require permission or licenses, and his hence a privilege.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tnetennba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7993a0/32.png) [@tnetennba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tnetennba)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2005, 4:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/31 "2005-01-07T04:45:30Z")

</div>

What’s a “priviledge,” by the way? Is that a little shelf in an outhouse?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xema](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/9de053/32.png) [@Xema](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Xema)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2005, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025/32 "2005-01-08T03:40:51Z")

</div>

> [@cricetus](#):
>
> My right to free speech, religion, and so on do not require permission or licenses of any kind. Driving DOES require permission or licenses, and his hence a privilege.

And yet Mr2001 has rather cogently drawn the analogy between voting and driving. Most people seem to accept that voting is a right, yet it requires registration, law-abiding behavior, adherence to defined procedures, etc. much as driving does.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-have-a-right-to-a-drivers-license/283025.md?page=1)
