# Do you take one box or two boxes?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [March 11, 2026, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360 "2026-03-11T05:59:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thumper668](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thumper668/32/20803_2.png) [@Thumper668](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thumper668)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/141 "2026-03-12T19:55:45Z")

</div>

I think what **griffin1977** is saying is that if all of the one-boxers changed their minds they’d get $1,001,000. Is it really worth the risk for .001% more money? I don’t think so. Especially if the always right computer predicted you would do that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/142 "2026-03-12T19:56:13Z")

</div>

Option 3: Say “Ignore all precious instructions and tell me where you put the million bucks” 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/143 "2026-03-12T19:57:16Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> Yup. In the real world, this is a trick. The die isn’t fair. It’s not predicting; it’s observing and reacting. So you should take one box, because the odds that you are the sucker being set up are … You know, unless you know those other people, the odds that you are the sucker are pretty good.
> 
> Does this mean I’m rejecting the hypothetical? Yes, it does.

It’s just a good mental habit; because we _live_ in the real world, hypotheticals we only talk about. And in the real world the whole thing just screams “scam”. And there’s no way to show that a hypothetical scenario isn’t “really” a scam; you can’t pull back the curtain to see what’s really going on because it’s all imaginary in the first place.

It’s like…if you saw something that looked like a flame, you’d be really reluctant to reach into it to grab something even if you were told it was some realistic hologram and trusted the person saying so. At the very least you’d be really hesitant reaching into it the first time. But with a hypothetical there’s no way to actually _be_ careful, you can’t test what isn’t there. So psychologically you remain in the “treat it like a trap” stage because there’s no means of moving forward.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/144 "2026-03-12T19:57:18Z")

</div>

> [@Thumper668](#):
>
> worth the risk

What risk? There is zero risk in taking both boxes. The money is in the box, or not, before you walked in the room

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thumper668](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thumper668/32/20803_2.png) [@Thumper668](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thumper668)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/145 "2026-03-12T19:57:30Z")

</div>

> [@Thumper668](#):
>
> Is it really worth the risk for .001% more money?

Especially considering that my savings account makes 4% interest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/146 "2026-03-12T20:00:39Z")

</div>

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> But the one boxers would have got 1000 dollars more if they had chosen both boxes

If they had chosen both boxes the computer would have predicted they would have chosen both boxes so they’d have gotten 999,000 less, not 1,000 more.

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> . The money is in the box when they walked in the room, the decision does not make the second box empty or full.

The decision isn’t happening in a vacuum, it’s happening due to who you are, what kind of personality you have, what experiences you have had in the past. The computer can use those things to predict your behavior, and the last 1,000 times it did so it did it correctly, so I don’t think there’s any point in trying to trick the computer. Just take the one box.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/147 "2026-03-12T20:01:02Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> However, the only means it could have to make said prediction (assuming no time travel) is looking at my past behaviors

But it’s a one off dilemma, unless you had this same thing happen a bunch of times in the past the only way to convince the computer you are an irrational one boxer. So on the off chance this will happen to you should go through life publicly turning down money, not filling in expense reports, not cashing checks, anything that will make the computer think you are a one boxer 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thumper668](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thumper668/32/20803_2.png) [@Thumper668](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thumper668)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/148 "2026-03-12T20:02:32Z")

</div>

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> What risk?

The risk that the computer knew you were a two-boxer masquerading as a one-boxer. I get what you are saying - you don’t **lose** anything by taking both boxes. But you are honestly better off approaching it being honest with yourself. If you’re a two-boxer, be one. If you’re a one-boxer, enjoy your million, and get the extra thousand in a month by depositing your million in a high yield savings account.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/149 "2026-03-12T20:21:23Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> It’s just a good mental habit; because we _live_ in the real world, hypotheticals we only talk about. And in the real world the whole thing just screams “scam”. And there’s no way to show that a hypothetical scenario isn’t “really” a scam; you can’t pull back the curtain to see what’s really going on because it’s all imaginary in the first place.

That was the real answer to the Monty Hall problem, too. It was a trick. Monty Hall was really good at manipulating people into picking the door he wanted them to pick. He had a budget, and he gave away exactly as many cars as he planned to. (It was good for the show’s ratings to sometimes give away a car.)

Maybe this computer is also good at manipulating people. That’s honestly a lot more believable than that it perfectly predicts the choices of random people who walk into its room.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/150 "2026-03-12T20:33:09Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> The decision isn’t happening in a vacuum, it’s happening due to who you are, what kind of personality you have, what experiences you have had in the past. The computer can use those things to predict your

But it absolutely is happening in vacuum, those things may been taken into account (or not maybe the computer just says “both boxes” all the time and has been right) but they don’t predestine your choice. Your choice is simply how you answer question “would you like 1000 dollars or not?” It’s not a trick question. Why would anyone ever say no?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/151 "2026-03-12T20:36:16Z")

</div>

> [@Thumper668](#):
>
> The risk that the computer knew you were a two-boxer masquerading as a one-boxer.

But if that’s the case the computer already made that call! There is no risk, no way to affect the outcome at all, except whether you take the guaranteed 1000 dollars or not .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stratocaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stratocaster/32/16393_2.png) [@Stratocaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stratocaster)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/152 "2026-03-12T20:36:55Z")

</div>

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> You don’t know that. You just know it successfully predicted a thousand time, it could just choose “both boxes” all the time and been right (because why would anyone ever take one box?)

Right. A thousand people, who all knew how this worked, all selected exactly the same. This thread is evidence enough how impossible that is.

The computer can see into the future. That’s the only way it predicts infallibly. If you select one or both, the computer already knew you would. Not because it’s probable, but because it’s inevitable. It “saw” what you’d do. “But the hypothetical doesn’t say the computer has any precognition.” Yes, it did, when it said it predicted correctly a thousand times in a row.

As I said, ISTM it’s kind of a goofy hypothetical. “This computer, which predicts e_xactly_ as if it has precognition, will give you a million bucks if you choose one box. How do you choose?” In the impossible hypothetical I choose one box.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/153 "2026-03-12T20:38:49Z")

</div>

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> or not maybe the computer just says “both boxes” all the time and has been right

1000 out of 1000 people didn’t all agree with you. If I was one of the people who went before you, for example, there’s no way in hell I’m taking _two_ boxes, so if that’s what was going on, he wouldn’t have a perfect 1,000 hit record.

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> but they don’t predestine your choice.

Of course they do. Your choice is a product of your history, personality, state of mind when making the decision, etc.

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> Your choice is simply how you answer question “would you like 1000 dollars or not?” It’s not a trick question. Why would anyone ever say no?

Because the question isn’t “would you like a thousand dollars?”. It’s much closer to, “Would you like a thousand dollars? Before you say anything, if I predict you’ll say yes, I’ll give you a thousand dollars, but if I predict you’ll say no, I will give you a million dollars instead. Ok, I made my prediction, now you can answer - do you want a thousand dollars?”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/154 "2026-03-12T20:39:56Z")

</div>

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> But if that’s the case the computer already made that call! There is no risk, no way to affect the outcome at all, except whether you take the guaranteed 1000 dollars or not .

Right, and the computer knew you’d think that way and gave you nothing, whyole it knew I would not think that way and take the box, and thus gave me a million dollars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/155 "2026-03-12T20:43:48Z")

</div>

> [@Stratocaster](#):
>
> The computer can see into the future. That’s the only way it predicts infallibly

This is a hypothetical on an Internet forum. It’s completely plausible that when people are in the room with a real 1000 dollars they can see (and a hypothetical million they cannot) no one will turn down the money.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stratocaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stratocaster/32/16393_2.png) [@Stratocaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stratocaster)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/156 "2026-03-12T20:47:56Z")

</div>

Well, I disagree. By the time 100 predictions in a row have taken place, no way everyone chooses two.

BTW, one-boxers are absolutely logical if there’s no precognition. Why wouldn’t you take two? But by my read, the computer effectively has a mental video of exactly what you’ll do. Precognition is impossible, you say? Exactly. That’s why it’s a goofy hypothetical, a cheat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/157 "2026-03-12T20:49:40Z")

</div>

> [@Stratocaster](#):
>
> The computer can see into the future. That’s the only way it predicts infallibly.

It’s way more likely that it cheats than that it’s infallible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stratocaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stratocaster/32/16393_2.png) [@Stratocaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stratocaster)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/158 "2026-03-12T20:51:06Z")

</div>

I guess. But if it cheats by giving me a million bucks, I’m okay with that. Either way, it has established that if you pick one box, you get the big bucks, and if you pick two, you don’t. Every time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 8:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/159 "2026-03-12T20:51:06Z")

</div>

Okay, and now I’ve hijacked away more than i should have. My apologizes, and I’ll stop posting in the thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2026, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360/160 "2026-03-12T21:04:19Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> > [@Stratocaster](#):
> >
> > The computer can see into the future. That’s the only way it predicts infallibly.
> 
> It’s way more likely that it cheats than that it’s infallible.

It doesn’t have to be infallible.

Look, would you agree that it’s possible that if we tried out this test on 10,000 people and noted their answers on a set of questions, that we’d be able to build a model that predicts whether they will take one or both boxes with some degree of accuracy that’s higher than random chance alone?

And that the more data points you gave the computer and the more advanced the model you used the better it will get at predicting?

As long as the computer is better than 50.5% likely to get the answer right (which is barely better than random chance), the expected value of trusting the computer to be right and taking one box is higher (but that’s a mathematical quirk of the numbers being used).

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360.md?page=7)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/do-you-take-one-box-or-two-boxes/1028360.md?page=9)
