# "Doctor", not "the doctor"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 20, 2020, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427 "2020-10-20T18:37:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2020, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/41 "2020-10-23T01:43:06Z")

</div>

> [@doreen](#):
>
> But you’re right, the definite article does get dropped in American English

Sometimes it’s just dropped as a kind of shorthand, but without any change in meaning. I could say “Road’s closed” in response to someone asking why they can’t go this way, but it’s identical to “The road is closed.” It’s almost like a contraction.

I wonder if some of the uses of “Doctor’s in” are just due to this, as compared to use of “Doctor” as some kind of honorific.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2020, 4:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/42 "2020-10-23T04:56:27Z")

</div>

To my children I call the person I married and am sleeping with, “mom”.

Ya’ll worrried about bizarre _determiners_?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SanVito](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sanvito/32/2805_2.png) [@SanVito](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SanVito)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2020, 8:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/43 "2020-10-23T08:14:04Z")

</div>

> [@CookingWithGas](#):
>
> I’m not arguing that. Just that one phrase. Brits say “in hospital” but Americans do not.

That’s because ‘in hospital’ is generic, whereas ‘in the hospital’ means a specific hospital. It’s no different from saying ‘in prison’ or ‘in school’. I would say the US version is more inconsistent than the British.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bob\_2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bob_2/32/3341_2.png) [@bob\_2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bob_2)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2020, 8:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/44 "2020-10-23T08:41:33Z")

</div>

> [@doreen](#):
>
> I don’t think that’s quite the same. There are a couple of definitions of “go to bed” , but neither of them necessarily involves an actual bed.I don’t think there’s a meaning for “in hospital” that might not involve a hospital.
> 
> But you’re right, the definite article does get dropped in American English - we say “in prison” ,"in school, “in church” etc. But I’m not sure if they are always used in exactly the same way they are used across the pond - for example, “in school” or “in college” in the US might refer to being enrolled, rather than physically at a particular place.

Except that while you might be ‘in’ prison, my granddaughter is ‘at’ school if she is physically there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CookingWithGas](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cookingwithgas/32/485_2.png) [@CookingWithGas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CookingWithGas)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2020, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/45 "2020-10-23T19:50:33Z")

</div>

> [@SanVito](#):
>
> I would say the US version is more inconsistent than the British.

Inconsistency is what Americans do best 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 1:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/46 "2020-10-24T01:25:07Z")

</div>

> [@CookingWithGas](#):
>
> Inconsistency is what Americans do best 🙂

Not always.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 2:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/47 "2020-10-24T02:11:05Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> as compared to use of “Doctor” as some kind of honorific.

It’s not an honorific. It’s a (generic) name. Fred is ready. Doctor is ready. Mother is ready.

Why not use a full name? Because it’s not necessary.  
Fred Nurk is waiting for you.  
Doctor Frankenstein is in the surgery.  
Mother Hubbard lives in a shoe.

Full name is more formal:  
Thomas Sawyer. “That’s the name they lick me by. I’m Tom when I’m good. You call me Tom, will you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kron](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kron/32/12444_2.png) [@Kron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kron)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 2:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/48 "2020-10-24T02:33:16Z")

</div>

> [@bob\_2](#):
>
> Except that while you might be ‘in’ prison, my granddaughter is ‘at’ school if she is physically there.

Never really thought of that, but yes… In my usage:

My child is in school = my child regularly is attending school during normal scheduled times

My child is at school = my child is at this very moment attending school

My child is at the school = my child is currently located at the school building for any reason at all (or none) but not for classes

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Newtosite](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/newtosite/32/8623_2.png) [@Newtosite](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Newtosite)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 4:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/49 "2020-10-24T04:50:42Z")

</div>

This reminds me of the first line in a children’s book that bothered me when I read it as a kid: “It was Cook’s night out.” [https://www.tias.com/tom-and-jerrys-party-little-golden-book-222488.html](https://www.tias.com/tom-and-jerrys-party-little-golden-book-222488.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 7:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/50 "2020-10-24T07:25:58Z")

</div>

Grammar book says (among other things):

> [@](#):
>
> Unlike many other languages, English normally requires an article with a singular count noun as complement:
> 
> Bill is _an engineer._ / Mary is _the secretary._
> 
> There is, however, one circumstance in which the zero article occurs in such constructions: this is where the complement (or an equivalent appositive noun phrase) names a UNIQUE ROLE or task. As the following examples show, in such cases the zero article alternates with _the_:
> 
> Maureen is _(the) captain of the team_.  
> John F. Kennedy was _(the) President of the United States_ in 1961.  
> […]

“In hospital”, “in class”, etc., are covered under quasi-locative phrases concerning some institutions of human life and society; other examples of zero article are for means of transport and communication, times of day and night, seasons, meals, and illnesses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-DUB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/e-dub/32/403_2.png) [@E-DUB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-DUB)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/51 "2020-10-24T16:54:23Z")

</div>

I think of “in hospital” as a Britishism. Same with “university”. As an American, I went to _a_ university. I went to college at _a_ university.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 8:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/52 "2020-10-24T20:03:26Z")

</div>

> [@Melbourne](#):
>
> It’s not an honorific. It’s a (generic) name. Fred is ready. Doctor is ready. Mother is ready.
> 
> Why not use a full name? Because it’s not necessary.  
> Fred Nurk is waiting for you.  
> Doctor Frankenstein is in the surgery.

You seem to be saying two different things. I’d agree that “the doctor”, in common usage, is just a generic name (aside from “The Doctor” used by Doctor Who). But you talk about a “full name”, which implies that “Doctor” is a shortened version of “Doctor Frankenstein”. But that’s keeping the honorific part, not using a generic label. Or, at the least, using the honorific as a kind of office nickname.

Sometimes the indefinite article gets dropped in casual speech, but I don’t think that’s what’s going on here–it’s not “the doctor” that got elided into “doctor”. Where it’s used, it seems to be used consistently, and possibly as a sign of respect. I wonder if people that use that form capitalize it if in the middle of a sentence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/53 "2020-10-24T21:08:10Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> But that’s keeping the honorific part, not using a generic label. Or, at the least, using the honorific as a kind of office nickname.

It’s a _first_ name. Like _Fred_.

It’s a descriptive first name, like Smith, or Black, or Huxtable or Marshall are (were) descriptive last names. Like Andrew, Mary, Allen are (were) descriptive first names.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/54 "2020-10-24T21:14:08Z")

</div>

> [@E-DUB](#):
>
> I think of “in hospital” as a Britishism. Same with “university”. As an American, I went to _a_ university. I went to college at _a_ university.

‘went to college’ ? Not ‘a college’?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kron](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kron/32/12444_2.png) [@Kron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kron)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/55 "2020-10-24T21:22:38Z")

</div>

Right, that’s the Americanism I mentioned a few posts back, same thing: “I’m in school/college” means “I regularly attend/am enrolled at a school/college”.

“Went to college” means “I was previously enrolled at a college/university”. We never use the “went to university” construction, and we generally don’t say “went to a college”, UNLESS it was part of a broader informative statement, such as “I went to a college in the middle of the prairie in Nebraska that you have never heard of.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/56 "2020-10-24T21:32:53Z")

</div>

But that’s exactly the usage we’re talking about;  
Went:  
to college = was enrolled  
to hospital = received treatment  
to prison = was convicted of a crime  
to church = attended worship  
to school = attended class

Both variants of English have these constructions, just not in the same assortment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 11:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/57 "2020-10-24T23:00:19Z")

</div>

> [@Melbourne](#):
>
> It’s a _first_ name. Like _Fred_ .

I find that to be a very odd way of looking at things. The doctor already has a first name, and it’s probably not Doctor. Plus, plenty of doctors will go by “Doctor Steve” or the like. In non-medical settings, he goes by Steve. In the office, the honorific Doctor is added.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bob\_2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bob_2/32/3341_2.png) [@bob\_2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bob_2)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2020, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/58 "2020-10-24T23:06:01Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> Sometimes the indefinite article gets dropped in casual speech, but I don’t think that’s what’s going on here–it’s not “the doctor” that got elided into “doctor”. Where it’s used, it seems to be used consistently, and possibly as a sign of respect. I wonder if people that use that form capitalize it if in the middle of a sentence.

“Doctor Doctor, I’ve got this strawberry growing on my head.”

“Don’t worry, I’ve got some cream for that.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![needscoffee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/needscoffee/32/1076_2.png) [@needscoffee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/needscoffee)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2020, 4:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/59 "2020-10-25T04:26:54Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> to hospital = received treatment

That wouldn’t ever be used in the US, any more than we’d say, “He went to store.” It’s always “to _the_ hospital.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2020, 1:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427/60 "2020-10-26T13:47:40Z")

</div>

Yes, but you do have some of the others such as ‘to church’. Like I said, both dialects do this, just in different assortments.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/doctor-not-the-doctor/923427.md?page=4)
