Does a presidential visit to a disaster area help in any meaningful way?

Logically, no. Emotionally, yes. I don’t think it does any harm; he brings his own security detail, and presumably he’s flying around the place in a chopper rather than blocking the roads that aren’t already impassable with a motorcade.

Their Rep. has been taking some flack for voting to strip funding for the National Weather Service right before the storm. Red that corner of the state might be, but I wonder if this could be an opportunity to flip them a bit toward the blue side.

I think this feel-good emotional woo is a huge waste of time and resources. This and similar bullshit (like the speeches and ceremonies on holidays, mem day being a recent example) makes me wonder if it would not be better to have a separate more ceremonial head of state so thAt the head of government can focus on more important matters.

I think 9/11 was different than a local disaster. We were attacked as a nation and there was great angst at what was going on.

I do, however, think it was a bad precedent to set for local disasters whoever started it. It’s a great waste of resources and it ties up airspace.