Which causes the content on those mainstream but video-heavy sites to suddenly include actual written news articles how?
At least you would get the text part without any auto-play or pretty graphics. If there is no transcript, you can use some sort of search engine thingy to look for a site that has actual printed words instead of video.
This is because most web pages are pretty badly designed. URLs are part of it.
If I saw a link that went to: “video.somewebsite.com”, I wouldn’t be at all bothered by the fact that it contained an autoplaying video. Just like, when I go to Youtube, I expect there to be a video, and I expect it to autoplay. Why else would I be going there?
The news websites that have a video at the top and a whole story in text below are just bad design. There’s almost no one who wants that page. The people who want the video aren’t going to read the text. The people who want to read are annoyed that their computer is making noise.
Fuck no. I wrote a blog post about how much of a pain in the ass it is to have nothing but videos. Sometimes video is better, most of the time it’s not.
The only time I’ve ever preferred video to text is when I was trying to rethread my overedger and I couldn’t figure out how to thread one of the needles. I looked at the instructions, but they were no help so I found a Youtube video where they showed exactly where the hole was on the needle (not where I thought) and the hand calisthenics needed to reach it.
Do yourself a favor; download and start using Links.
Stranger