then buy a reputable copy if the software and see if you can find anything- of course it helps if you have an idea of what your looking for-
Its one thing to have a bunch of people put the code down -and they believe in god- and they put it down with out even trying it- again- you have to have some things to look for-
in edgar cayces readings its mentioned that amilius is the angel (you know him as Michael) the did the work for god as adam and then again as jesus- and you can find amilius name in the codes (sp) I’ll look it up if you get back to me -
basically another way to look at it is man has finally become so smart that you’ve figured out the base for how he made everything- he still wants credit and doesn’t want you to forget he’s there- you’ve also become so smart- man can destroy the entire planet in a couple of hours- you’ve never been at that level before
See my objections from the earlier part of this thread. How do you define your canonical sequence of letters? What language are you using? Are you using an original Hebrew text? Do you then jump to Greek for the NT? What about chapter titles and other text? What about spaces?
There isn’t any “reputable” copy. The algorithm is trivial, and any jackass (by which I mean myself) can write a BASIC program to select every N letters, beginning with letter M. Again, I’ve done this myself, with several books. You will find coincidental instances of letters and words, but nothing more. You will find these coincidences in any book you choose.
It’s like looking at the stars and seeing constellations. It doesn’t mean that Cygus is actually a Swan.
Bingo! Now you understand! Seek and ye shall find.
So what if you find a desired combination of letters? What does that prove? Nothing more than the source work is big enough that there are gadzillions of possible letter combinations. If you think there is something more than probability at work here, the thought is all in your mind.
One needs to be smarter than that and be able to identify pseudoscience. So far the team of “luminaries” you are referring to are getting struck out, and not even Cayce at the bat can help you get a hit:
-John 19, 23-24. The loincloth on paintings of the Crucifixion was put there by the author for modesty purposes. You found the word “diapers” and then derived a conclusion from it.
I was skeptical at first, but did my own search, without the software, on the King James Bible. In just a few minutes, I was stunned at how often Michelle Obama is mentioned. I see nine references just to “Her Obama.”
Of these the most ominous might be found taking every tenth letter from the following verse. (Please note that the verse mentions “tenth” so contains a clue to its own decoding.)
[QUOTE=Leviticus 14:21]
And if he be poor, and cannot get so much; then He shall takE one lamb foR a trespass Offering to Be waved, to mAke an atoneMent for him, And one tentH deal of finE flour mingLed with oil For a meat offering, and a log of oil;
[/QUOTE]
The message “Her Obama Helf” is pretty clear, despite that King James’ men tried to muddy the waters with a Germanish spelling of “Helpf.” Why would a detailed recipe be needed in this verse, if not to encode a prophecy?
I’m not at all sure who Michelle’s man is predicted to help. Al-Qaeda? Wall Street? More research is needed.
That does help a lot, actually. As I understand it, Hebrew doesn’t have spaces between words. But what about the vowel marks? Are those “letters” or marks that are attached to letters?
The “Bible Code” technique crosses from one book to another. So the question of the exact order of the books comes up, as well as the question of the headings of books. Does the title of a book go into its text?
If the Bible Code fans limited themselves to single Old Testament books in ancient Hebrew, their case would still be remarkably stupid, but at least they would have eliminated these ambiguities.
Recently I read that the Jesus myth has been exposed as a fraud. This can be proved by the King James Bible itself:
[QUOTE=Isaiah Chapter 6]
1 In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple.
2 Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly.
3 And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.
4 And the posts of the door moved at the voice of him that cried, and the house was filled with smoke.
5 Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts.
6 Then flew one of the seraphims unto me, having a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar:
[/QUOTE]
In Verse 5, the Prophet admits he’s lying (“unclean lips”) but look closer at that verse:
Start with ‘T’ and read every second letter: T esiio I’m fraud …
“esiio” is of course a repetition of Uzziah (the King referred to in Verse 1), which in turn is a homonymic code for Isaiah, the Prophet about whom Wikipedia writes
So who was T[itus] Esiio (Esias)? In the family tree of the Flavian family, you can see that the first Emperor of that Dynasty, Vespasian, had an uncle whose name is suppressed! I think that uncle was Titus Esias the Prophet, and that he left a coded confession about his deception in the Book named after him.
I know some nit-pickers will wonder how this coded message could have found its way into an English-language Bible when English didn’t even exist at the time of the Jesus fraud. Ah … such are the mysterious ways of the Divine!
Like the first successful time travel device, the first successful matter teleporters, the cures for AIDS and multiple sclerosis, and the magic bullet vaccine that prevents all forms of cancer.