No you haven’t. You lied beginning with your first post to this thread:
This has been repeatedly shown to be a lie, which you have yet to retract.
Eye. Log. Yours.
Because you keep posting crap like this:
Bush’s best approaches Clinton’s average, as noted. Yet you posted that as a refutation. Also:
Either you really do not understand the difference between magnitude and rate, or you are simply blind to your own spin. If you fell down a well, caught hold of a brick, then a higher brick, what would you think of someone who yelled down at you that you were doing great?
The rate had been at 1 percent, now 1.25. Big fuckin’ nail. Still way below what Bush even started with. Some of us remember double digits, and I’m not that old, either.
The topic was your claim that he was performing classic pump-priming. Having been shown that he wasn’t, you deny that you even said it. You never seem to remember that all that anyone has to do is scroll up.
You haven’t said that. You continue to habitually misrepresent what you’re being told in a way that destroys the credibility of anything you do say, and your habitual middle-excluding hurts you almost as much. This is an example of you doing both in the same post. As you’ve also shown here, it’s equally habitual for you to misrepresent your own damn posts. In this example, you are trying strenuously to avoid blaming Bush in *any * way for a still-crappy economy. even if that takes thrashing around for a way to deny its crappiness. That does not mean that anyone who disagrees with that reductively-simplistic view holds the opposite reductively-simplistic one. Yet it’s everyone else whose knees are jerking.
Actually, Fear Itself summarizes the situation more succinctly.
Just to do the math: You could give 10 million people $50,000 /yr jobs for that sort of money!