Does it make sense to say "I'm proud to be an American."

I beg to differ. When I am emotionally invested in my community (and am not an idiot) I will recognize when something needs to be fixed, and enlist the aid of my fellow community members in correcting the flaw. This may involve educating people as to the nature of the problem or even convincing them the problem even exists (the elephant in the living room is notoriously difficult to perceive).

I respectfully disagree with this. Civic pride is that sense of belonging, the commitment to the greater good of the group as a whole. The minute we feel that we as individuals have no need for that commitment, our society is doomed to fail.

Pride in the community has been a part of society since the beginning of time from cave men to tribal society to modern civilization.

I feel an ethical obligation to all my fellow humans. I just try not to rank them based on any in-group designations that I happen to share. For example, I don’t go out of my way to buy stuff that says “Made in USA”, as poor people in other countries also need jobs.

I specifically said that I am not denying it’s existence. Why do you feel the need to emphasize that it’s real?

<Sorry for the multipost>
Well then I suppose it’s important for you then. If it really does help you be a better person, then have at it. I guess I should have said that I should try to fight against it.

God says this–They promise you freedom,yet themselves are still slaves to corruption-- Who promises freedom? Gods kingdom has a king-so obviously it is the best form of Govt. He said of democracy-A house divided will not stand. Its men who tell you this is the greatest form of govt.

The problem that I have with nationalism is not that it builds communities (that’s wonderful) but that it sets us up into an “Us vs Them” dichotomy. There’s the “in group” that we sympathize with, and then the “out group”, the people who are not us that don’t deserve any of our concern or compassion, and that can be be attacked if they inconvenience us for any reason.

We evolved as hunter-gatherers. Our “natural” communities are estimated to be about 150. That’s about as many people as you can really get to know personally. The idea of “nations” with millions of people is an artificial construct. It may be a useful construct, but it’s artificial nonetheless. If we can love the artificial construct of “America” with 300 million people, 99.99% of the population of whom we will never know personally, why not extend our identification further and identify with all humanity? Even better, why not all sentient beings in the universe?