# Does the GOP Tax Law effectively repeal ObamaCare?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [December 26, 2017, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340 "2017-12-26T21:09:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2017, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340/41 "2017-12-29T14:49:30Z")

</div>

I find this “cliff” so outrageous that I wanted to start a new thread. But I couldn’t decide whether the thread would belong in GQ, GD, IMHO, or BBQ Pit.

> [@jasg](#):
>
> The subsidy is also quite perverse $1 over the income limit and you lose it all.

And I see that a month ago, a new poster also mentioned this:

> [@The Dems should put forward their own tax reform plan](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-dems-should-put-forward-their-own-tax-reform-plan/801507/86):
>
> As crazy as it is such a cliff is not crazy to Democrats. They put a cliff just like that in Obamacare Subsidies. For 2018 a Family of 4 making $98,400 gets a $847 per month subsidy, get a $1 raise putting you at $98,401 and your subsidy is $0 . That $1 raise only cost you $10,164 per year. That’s real world Democrat passed into law crazy.

( **No Time For Fishing** made four other posts in toto, and disappeared. I guess he had no time … or finally got to go fishing.)

My question is: _ **HOW did such an extremely bad “cliff” become law?** _ Surely law-makers are acquainted with the concept of such cliffs and their adverse results. Was it stupidity by the D’s, malice by the R’s, greed by insurance industry, or a combination of the three? Or is there some ‘Gotcha’ we’re overlooking and it really is more sensical than it appears?

I even Googled ‘Contact my Congresscritters’ since it was their “idea” and, with great tedium, sent a message. (However I expect, at best, gibberish in response. :rolleyes: )

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Orwell](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/dfb087/32.png) [@Orwell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Orwell)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2017, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340/42 "2017-12-29T15:09:59Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> My question is: _ **HOW did such an extremely bad “cliff” become law?** _ Surely law-makers are acquainted with the concept of such cliffs and their adverse results. Was it stupidity by the D’s, malice by the R’s, greed by insurance industry, or a combination of the three? Or is there some ‘Gotcha’ we’re overlooking and it really is more sensical than it appears?

The bill passed with zero R votes, so I don’t see how you can pin any of the blame on Republicans. The Democrats own this monstrosity. And they’ve shown time and time again they have no grasp of economics.

Having said that, this is pretty typical of government, and plenty of bills passed by both sides, and bipartisan, have absurd aspects. Congress is so insulated from real life, and so beholden to lobbyists and special interests, this is what we get. The first step is term limits. 12 Years is plenty long, and get rid of their pensions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2017, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340/43 "2017-12-29T16:10:07Z")

</div>

> [@Orwell](#):
>
> The bill passed with zero R votes, so I don’t see how you can pin any of the blame on Republicans.

A view that I’ve heard is that early legislation often has flaws that need to be ironed out, but that, with the goal of deliberate sabotage, the R’s filibustered any attempt to improve ACA. No?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Orwell](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/dfb087/32.png) [@Orwell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Orwell)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2017, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340/44 "2017-12-29T16:23:30Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> A view that I’ve heard is that early legislation often has flaws that need to be ironed out, but that, with the goal of deliberate sabotage, the R’s filibustered any attempt to improve ACA. No?

Yeah, there’s probably truth in that, at least to a degree. It seems reckless to pass legislation that you expect to be cleaned up later. Sort of a cop-out and an excuse. But we are talking about congress, and that’s how they do things. And then you have the insurance industry, who played key rolls in writing the legislation. The whole thing is a horrible mess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2017, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340/45 "2017-12-29T16:58:24Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> A view that I’ve heard is that early legislation often has flaws that need to be ironed out, but that, with the goal of deliberate sabotage, the R’s filibustered any attempt to improve ACA. No?

I heard the same thing, but on the opposite side - that ACA would mess things up so badly that the US would have no option but to go to single-payer.

It is difficult to say what the motives were, since one of the chief architects of Obamacare mentions a deliberate effort at obfuscation about what it was and what it would cost, because the bill would not have passed if people realized what it did -

> [@](#):
>
> In terms of risk rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in, you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed. Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really really critical to get for the thing to pass.

[Cite](https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/11/10/obamacare-architect-yeah-we-lied-to-the-stupid-american-people-n1916605).

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2017, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340/46 "2017-12-29T18:06:54Z")

</div>

Since that “chief architect” wasn’t actually a legislator who sponsored the bill or voted for it, his opinion is irrelevant. For example, Justice Roberts did not address Gruber’s comments in the majority opinion in _King v. Burwell_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mdcastle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/958977/32.png) [@Mdcastle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mdcastle)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2017, 2:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340/47 "2017-12-30T02:33:47Z")

</div>

Failure of Obamacare isn’t going to be enough to shake up the insurance industry enough to force the government to implement single payer. There’s about 12.7 Million Americans under Obamacare, or about 4% of the population (the other 8.3 million in the commonly thrown out 20 million figure are due to Medicaid expansion and the age 26 mandate, neither of which are central to the ACA). If an additional 4% of the population can’t get individual insurance it’s not going to cause a crisis. They’ll either get jobs that offer insurance or go without, and either have to pay cash or have their costs written off and passed on to everyone else. Even assuming a 4% rise in uninsured that’s not enough to break the multi-payer system for everyone else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![albino\_manatee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/albino_manatee/32/2_2.png) [@albino\_manatee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/albino_manatee)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2017, 3:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340/48 "2017-12-30T15:11:14Z")

</div>

> [@wonky](#):
>
> _" It repeals the requirement that you must have health insurance or pay a penalty after 2018. It does not … "_

yesss-s-s-s … that’s all i needed to know … much thanks!

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-gop-tax-law-effectively-repeal-obamacare/805340.md?page=2)
