# Does the political spectrum actually exist?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [November 14, 2006, 3:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352 "2006-11-14T03:55:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 3:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/1 "2006-11-14T03:55:03Z")

</div>

It is my contention that a useful political approximation (the map) has become the  
agreed-upon reality (territory), and hardly anyone questions its existence. Yet it  
is likely impossible to shoehorn any and every political view into this simple binary  
spectrum and make said view a good fit. Take libertarianism, which more often than  
not sits uneasily somewhere on the right, even though a number of left-ish views  
have quite a bit in common with libertarianism. In reality there are likely innumerable  
political axes of this sort, and not just one, but we seem stuck with the one we have.

In any event do you see the L-R political spectrum eventually fading, and being  
replaced by something else (or being replaced by people becoming comfortable  
dealing with real life’s complexities for a change and not a simplistic model). Being  
the idealist that I am I hope the recent events in the US will help to usher the old  
L-R view off the stage, but perhaps it serves a useful purpose after all? Or is our  
weddedness to the spectrum hampering genuine positive change as we remain  
shackled to our outdated views and models, afraid to cross the imaginary line  
between liberal and conservative, even if the line doesn’t in fact exist?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shagnasty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9dc877/32.png) [@Shagnasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shagnasty)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/2 "2006-11-14T03:58:14Z")

</div>

There are other visual models for political beliefs.

There are ones like these in two dimesions as well.

[http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz-score/quiz.php](http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz-score/quiz.php)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xash](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/c6cbf5/32.png) [@xash](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/xash)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 4:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/3 "2006-11-14T04:57:21Z")

</div>

Moved to GD.

- **xash**  
General Questions Moderator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 5:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/4 "2006-11-14T05:08:02Z")

</div>

See [here](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_spectrum) for various alternative models, including multidimensional ones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 5:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/5 "2006-11-14T05:23:27Z")

</div>

There seem to be two questions here: 1) Does the linear left-right political spectrum model adequately describe real-life variation in political views, and 2) Will this model eventually disappear to be replaced by a more complex model?

My take on it is

1. No, and

2. No.

The simple left-right linear spectrum has never been an accurate description of what political views actually encompass, but it’s been in use for at least a couple of hundred years of intense variation in political ideology, and I don’t think it’s going away any time soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baffle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/dec6dc/32.png) [@Baffle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baffle)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 6:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/6 "2006-11-14T06:03:32Z")

</div>

As long as you have a two-party system, a single-axis spectrum probably works fine. If, after electoral reform, viable minor parties come about, then different political spectra will likely become popular.

I’m most familiar with the method [politicalcompass.org](http://politicalcompass.org) uses – in my minor political experience, it’s a fairly accurate way to describe any person’s political leanings.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 6:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/7 "2006-11-14T06:36:11Z")

</div>

It’s not particularly useful IMO. It assumes if you have certain beliefs then you will have other beliefs, even though the issues may not be related. Just because your pro-life doesn’t mean you can’t be concerned about global warming. If your opposed to the Iraq war you can also support stronger measures to control illegal immigration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/8 "2006-11-14T14:10:43Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=John DiFool]  
In any event do you see the L-R political spectrum eventually fading, and being replaced by something else (or being replaced by people becoming comfortable dealing with real life’s complexities for a change and not a simplistic model).  
[/QUOTE]  
As commonly used, the simplcity of the model isn’t a drawback, it’s the feature. Most people don’t care enough about politics to try to graph the new Congress’s political views on a three dimentional chart.

I’m reminded of that thing that Leonard Nemoy says in Civ IV whenever I discover some new technology: the test of a good invention is not whether there is anything left to add, but whether there’s anything left to take away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/9 "2006-11-14T14:26:10Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Baffle]  
As long as you have a two-party system, a single-axis spectrum probably works fine. If, after electoral reform, viable minor parties come about, then different political spectra will likely become popular.

[/QUOTE]

Nope. In multi-party countries, they still use a linear model.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/10 "2006-11-14T14:28:10Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Ravenman]  
I’m reminded of that thing that Leonard Nemoy says in Civ IV whenever I discover some new technology: the test of a good invention is not whether there is anything left to add, but whether there’s anything left to take away.  
[/QUOTE]

Is Nimoy the guy doing the voiceover in English? The quote is from St. Exupèry. (And some of those voiceovers make absolutely no sense the way they’re read, specially in languages other than English… it’s quite evident the reader has no idea what the original context is)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FinnAgain](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/finnagain/32/12500_2.png) [@FinnAgain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FinnAgain)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 2:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/11 "2006-11-14T14:40:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=John DiFool]  
It is my contention that a useful political approximation (the map) has become the agreed-upon reality (territory), and hardly anyone questions its existence.  
[/QUOTE]

Well, the map never becomes the territory, just like the menu never becomes the meal. But lots of people are still willing to suck on the finger that points to the moon instead of following where it points.

There will always be people who are ignorant, to some degree or another, of the process of abstracting, the fallacious use of composition and division, the ephemerality of most generalizations, etc… But that doesn’t mean all that much, IMO. Some people have relatively poor semantic hygiene, and they’ll generally confuse words with the things they represent.

I can see where you’re coming from, and I do think that such false-to-facts thinking is a detriment to humanity… but I don’t think that using a political spectrum, especially if it’s done on a belief-by-belief basis, is necessarily detrimental.  
/ramble

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/12 "2006-11-14T23:49:05Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Ravenman]  
I’m reminded of that thing that Leonard Nemoy says in Civ IV whenever I discover some new technology: the test of a good invention is not whether there is anything left to add, but whether there’s anything left to take away.  
[/QUOTE]

I believe the tech that goes with that quote is Engineering.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dtilque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d6d6ee/32.png) [@dtilque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dtilque)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2006, 9:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/13 "2006-11-15T09:37:28Z")

</div>

Anyone else ever notice that Libertarians are the only ones who ever bring up the points in the OP? I guess they just don’t like being stuck way out there on the right wing when some of their positions match those of people on the left. But it does make a good for test for identifying them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2006, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/14 "2006-11-15T15:48:38Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=dtilque]  
Anyone else ever notice that Libertarians are the only ones who ever bring up the points in the OP?  
[/QUOTE]

I hadn’t noticed that before, and certainly didn’t notice it while reading the article full of counter-examples in the link posted by **BrainGlutton**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2006, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/15 "2006-11-15T15:56:01Z")

</div>

It’s because people with off-axis political views often get marginalized by the on-axis extremes. People with fiscally conservative, socially liberal views (like myself and many others on the SDMB) and those who prefer leftish economics and conservative social agendas (apparently rare around here) are typically accused of being wishy-washy or too moderate or traitorous for daring to step away from the political axis.

The best hope for us is a multi-party system, although it might be fun if the two major parties realigned onto other axis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2006, 6:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-the-political-spectrum-actually-exist/380352/16 "2006-11-15T18:05:18Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=dtilque]  
Anyone else ever notice that Libertarians are the only ones who ever bring up the points in the OP? I guess they just don’t like being stuck way out there on the right wing when some of their positions match those of people on the left. But it does make a good for test for identifying them.  
[/QUOTE]

Except that I’m not a libertarian (my best friend is). My underlying concern was how much  
attachment to this model ends up affecting who is elected and what laws are passed, and  
whether the recent election might be a step away from all that.
