In light of this, I say we need this amendment – or some better-worded and broader-reaching one – now more than ever!
tomndebb:
The proposed amendment would not actually provide a shield against the sort of harassment that a few Republicans have proposed. It would be no big deal to argue that a photo ID was “Narrowly tailored” for “efficient voting.” Even if that was a crock of shit, one would have to produce the notes from a GOP meeting in which they rubbed their hands and cackled over keeping out the riff-raff before you would sway the current SCOTUS to rule against such a rule based on the proposed amendment.
Would you kindly post proof that such a meeting ever occurred? And would you post proof that asking for a government issued ID somehow causes someone to lose the right to vote?
What right to vote? That’s the whole point here, there ain’t one and there should be.