Meh. All McQuarrie did was use photos of Vasquez Rocks.
Private property is a lie, its not possible for anyone to own anything.
Molon labe
Off to MPSIMS
You’re delusional.
That was actually Waldo.
…and a thief. That’s the best punch I’ve ever seen on video. He could have been a boxer.
I own the Moon (Earth’s large natural satellite).
Larry, Lord of the Selenites.
I think these people are disputing your claims: http://lunarembassy.com/
Wait… I have this receipt…
Son, who do you think user_hostile is in real life?
The American moon landings were clearly faked. The first actual landings were by the British astronauts Wallace and Gromit, who brought back Wensleydale cheese, rather than a load of old rocks that could have been from anywhere.
Watch the documentary film A Grand Day Out for proof. I’ve not heard of any conspiracy theorist doubting its veracity.
So the Moon belongs to Britain.
He’s a West Point man – the Academy’s PE requirements for men include one semester of boxing.
After all these years, don’t we (the United States, that is) get to claim ownership by adverse possession?
In no real sense does the US own the moon (they don’t own anything really - but that’s a different issue). They did visit it yes, and perhaps a claim could be made that they have a bit of the property, to the extent that they could throw a axe from the door of the lunar spacecraft and where it lands established their property line. But they abandoned their dwelling so that is also on very shaky ground, and that claim of property would go to the person, not the nation.
But there is no practical way to effect ownership as they can not get there, nor stop anyone else.
While everybody knows the landings were faked, hardly anyone knows that Kubrik fought tooth and nail to cast Peter Sellers as Armstrong, Jack Nicolson as “Buzz” and the voice of HAL9000 as Collins.
Eventually NASA won out by casting unknowns, but Kubrik almost quit over the livid disagreement in artistic license.
It’s absolutely silly to think that the special effects state of the art would hold up to modern eyes. Event current CGI would likely be realized as fake.
Clearly the only explanation is that the video was done with not yet invented CGI techniques and provided by a time traveler. I subscribe to the theory that Pixar uses spare cycles in their rendering cluster to crunch the numbers for the physicists who eventually discover time travel in exchange for a substantial grant of rights to use of the time travel intellectual property. Buzz Aldrin actually had his nickname suggested by the time traveler because of a marketing tie-in to Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story 10.
First year law school: A Hooker ON Every Corner.
Possession must be actual, hostile, open and notorious, exclusive, and continuous. Since we haven’t been there since 1972 a country could claim adverse possession against us if they established something there.*
*Assuming that we are just joking about owning the moon. We signed a treaty. See Post #2.
We did go back, several times. (We as in humanity - I’m not American).
I mean, the original movie was so successful they had to make some sequels.
Right…and from your link: