# Does this diserve a warning?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [June 13, 2018, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056 "2018-06-13T22:47:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/1 "2018-06-13T22:47:40Z")

</div>

[Poster starts a thread](https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=21020731), ends it with “Explain for me, please. Or at least reveal I am a moron for even considering this.” I make the joke “You are a moron for even considering this.” Get warning for an insult.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 10:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/2 "2018-06-13T22:52:42Z")

</div>

Yes it does deserve a warning. Or no it doesn’t deserve a warning. It depends on which way the wind blows today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 10:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/3 "2018-06-13T22:53:38Z")

</div>

He didn’t ask you to insult him, he asked you to explain it to him. You didn’t explain anything to him; you just took advantage of an opportunity to insult him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/4 "2018-06-13T23:10:48Z")

</div>

He asked to be told if he was a moron. His request was fulfilled.

> [@Mahaloth](#):
>
> Explain for me, please. Or at least reveal I am a moron for even considering this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snfaulkner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snfaulkner/32/433_2.png) [@snfaulkner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snfaulkner)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/5 "2018-06-13T23:11:33Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> He didn’t ask you to insult him, he asked you to explain it to him. You didn’t explain anything to him; you just took advantage of an opportunity to insult him.

Would he still gotten the warning if he (Darren G) ended his so-called insult with :D, like Mahaloth (the OP) did?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/6 "2018-06-13T23:18:26Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> He asked to be told if he was a moron. His request was fulfilled.

Wrong. He asked to “reveal” he was a moron by explaining the question to him. He never asked to be called a moron.

Statements like that do not give other posters leave to insult the OP. **Darren Garrison** gave no indication that he was joking, and in any case insults don’t get a free pass merely because they are intended as jokes.

[From the Rules.](https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=7697044&postcount=10)

> [@](#):
>
> Generally, you may not directly insult or personally attack other posters. The strictness of this rule varies a bit by forum, but the basic rule is that you should attack what the other person says, not the other person. \*\*This rule applies to all insults, including jokes \*\*and quotes from books & movies, as others may not get the joke. Using smilies (e.g., “You’re a jerk;)”) does not make insults okay.

Bolding mine

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![watchwolf49](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e9c0ed/32.png) [@watchwolf49](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/watchwolf49)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/7 "2018-06-13T23:18:26Z")

</div>

Yeah … that’s a personal insult … just no way around it, you called him a moron, clear as daylight …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/8 "2018-06-13T23:35:09Z")

</div>

For what it’s worth, I disagree with Colibri’s warning. I think it was clear Darren Garrison was making a joke based on Mahaloth’s OP and not a genuine insult.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/9 "2018-06-13T23:42:35Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Wrong. He asked to “reveal” he was a moron by explaining the question to him. He never asked to be called a moron.

I am not even arguing about whether this is a rule violation, but I am not wrong. ‘Reveal’ is not a synonym for explain, and his statement asks for an explanation or as a minimum response that he was a moron if he was one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/10 "2018-06-13T23:44:53Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> For what it’s worth, I disagree with Colibri’s warning. I think it was clear Darren Garrison was making a joke based on Mahaloth’s OP and not a genuine insult.

See the rule I quoted. The fact that it was a joke was irrelevant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/11 "2018-06-13T23:49:39Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> I am not even arguing about whether this is a rule violation, but I am not wrong. ‘Reveal’ is not a synonym for explain, and his statement asks for an explanation or as a minimum response that he was a moron if he was one.

[Synonyms for reveal:](http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/reveal)

> [@](#):
>
> acknowledge  
> admit  
> affirm  
> announce  
> concede  
> confess  
> declare  
> divulge  
> _ **explain** _  
> expose  
> inform  
> publish  
> report  
> tell  
> avow  
> betray  
> broadcast  
> communicate  
> impart  
> leak  
> notify  
> proclaim  
> talk  
> unfold  
> utter  
> break the news  
> bring out into open  
> bring to light  
> come out with  
> get out of system  
> give away  
> give out  
> give the low-down  
> let cat out of the bag  
> let fall  
> let on  
> let out  
> let slip  
> make known  
> make plain  
> make public  
> put cards on table

He was clearly asking for something else than to be called a moron.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2018, 11:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/12 "2018-06-13T23:59:43Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> [Synonyms for reveal:](http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/reveal)
> 
> He was clearly asking for something else than to be called a moron.

I agree. Based on the rule you posted, which indicated a smiley cannot turn an insult into a non-insult, I believe it was a rule violation. That does not change the meaning of his request, which at best is ambiguous, but it does mean that responding by simply revealing that he is a moron is a rule violation even if intended as a joke, or actually is a joke.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2018, 12:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/13 "2018-06-14T00:14:27Z")

</div>

The joke wouldn’t have been made without the invitation of the OP. Worth a note, but not a warning imho.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2018, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/14 "2018-06-14T00:20:16Z")

</div>

> [@BlankSlate](#):
>
> The joke wouldn’t have been made without the invitation of the OP. Worth a note, but not a warning imho.

I agree, but that decision is entirely within **Colibri** ’s purview, and clearly a rule violation. The mods have been given the authority to be arbitrary and capricious in their application of warnings for rule violations, but\*\* Colibri \*\*is known for applying warnings stringently in GQ and thus less arbitrary than the average mod in the average forum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayt/32/3633_2.png) [@kayT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayT)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2018, 12:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/15 "2018-06-14T00:23:18Z")

</div>

No more humor on the Dope! I think we’re done here.

Also, spelling (deserve not diserve)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2018, 12:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/16 "2018-06-14T00:30:18Z")

</div>

> [@kayT](#):
>
> No more humor on the Dope! I think we’re done here.
> 
> Also, spelling (deserve not diserve)

Hay, theirs know RULAA gainst miss spalling ate the Drupe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayt/32/3633_2.png) [@kayT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayT)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2018, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/17 "2018-06-14T00:34:32Z")

</div>

Oh, yer write. sorry

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2018, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/18 "2018-06-14T01:29:13Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> I agree, but that decision is entirely within **Colibri** ’s purview, and clearly a rule violation. The mods have been given the authority to be arbitrary and capricious in their application of warnings for rule violations, but\*\* Colibri \*\*is known for applying warnings stringently in GQ and thus less arbitrary than the average mod in the average forum.

Why thank you. I may change my title to that.🙂

Colibri  
Less Arbitrary Than the Average Mod

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2018, 1:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/19 "2018-06-14T01:47:52Z")

</div>

> [@BlankSlate](#):
>
> The joke wouldn’t have been made without the invitation of the OP. Worth a note, but not a warning imho.

I concur. It obviously wasn’t meant as a insult.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2018, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056/20 "2018-06-14T01:56:44Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> See the rule I quoted. The fact that it was a joke was irrelevant.

As I said, I disagree with this interpretation. I feel that the rule is that you can’t insult somebody with a joke. But telling a joke is allowed.

Insulting somebody directly, like saying _“Little Nemo, you’re stupid”_ is obviously a violation of the rules. And insulting somebody with a joke, like _“Little Nemo once wrote down Scorpio where the form said ‘sign here’”_ is also against the rules.

But I feel this was clearly just a joke, like if one person wrote _“Somebody call me a taxi”_ and another person responding with _“Okay, you’re a taxi.”_

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-this-diserve-a-warning/816056.md?page=2)
