# Does women's professional sport represent a kind special female privilege?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [August 20, 2014, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003 "2014-08-20T15:09:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/41 "2014-08-20T22:14:26Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> They play five sets as well which gives greater scope for the match to unfold.

They play five sets in four events all year. Those are the biggest four events, of course, but in every other tournament, the men and women both play best of three.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/42 "2014-08-20T22:28:22Z")

</div>

> [@jtur88](#):
>
> I have a (male) friend who watches only women’s basketball, because they are not tall enough to slam-dunk, tney have to play basketball “they way it is supposed to be played”.

I won’t say I watch _only_ women’s basketball, but I do watch _more_ women’s basketball. I prefer a slightly slower, below-the-rim game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 10:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/43 "2014-08-20T22:39:00Z")

</div>

I don’t agree with the OP at all. I do think there should be more male/female direct competition, and there are some sports where having seperate sexes is just stupid. Women’s pool? Women’s chess? Women’s bridge? C’mon! It’s demeaning to women. But I also like the idea of a females in UFC and we can’t get that without a seperate division. I like women’s basketball and tennis. They are a bit different games than the men’s versions, but awesome in their own way.

And again, I would love to see more male/female direct competition in non-contact sports. I’d like to see one tennis event a year that’s mixed competition. Sure, maybe no woman will get past the top 32, but what a story if one does! That’s what we live for in sports, the Cinderella story, this time with a real Cinderella! And I think that the difference in ability between males and females is often overrated. Sure, Venus Williams can’t beat the 160th ranked man. That’s because she never plays top male talent! I bet if the 15th ranked female tennis player played in the men’s division of every grand slam event for a year she’d be a MUCH better player because of the increased competition and would wipe the floor with female competition the following year when she rejoined the women’s circuit. Same with female basketball players. The few that have played in men’s leagues noticed immediately that the game is very different and they had to adjust and even if they still couldn’t run with the men as well as they’d like, it made them much better players because they played with men.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/44 "2014-08-20T22:47:12Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> They play five sets in four events all year. Those are the biggest four events, of course, but in every other tournament, the men and women both play best of three.

But the women _never_ play five sets…why not? can the audience not take the tedium for that long?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/45 "2014-08-20T22:59:40Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> I’d like to see one tennis event a year that’s mixed competition. Sure, maybe no woman will get past the top 32, but what a story if one does!

_maybe?_ No woman would come even close to qualifying. The best woman would be lucky to win a game off any of the top 200 men, let alone a set, let alone two sets. They wouldn’t gain any experience other than leaping aimlessly as another forehand return whizzes past them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/46 "2014-08-20T23:11:58Z")

</div>

All she needs is the practice to hit those back when they are in her area. They whiz by male players just the same as female players if the dude’s out of position. The problem for a woman isn’t that she can’t return a 180 mph forehand, it’s that she can’t respond in kind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/47 "2014-08-20T23:24:41Z")

</div>

Karsten Braasch

> [@](#):
>
> Braasch competed in a “Battle of the Sexes” contest against Venus Williams and Serena Williams at the 1998 Australian Open when he was ranked 203. A decade and a half older than the sisters, Braasch was described by one journalist as “a man whose training regime centred around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple bottles of ice cold lager.”[2] He nonetheless defeated both sisters, playing a single set against each, beating Serena 6–1 and Venus 6–2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 11:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/48 "2014-08-20T23:33:17Z")

</div>

I still want to see it. And in Braasch’s case, he may have been 203rd at the time, but he had peaked at #38. They weren’t taking on some has been or never will be. Also, Serena at the time wasn’t a top 10 player yet. She’s a better player now than she was then.

So maybe this time she loses 6-3 to a 200th ranked player. I still want to see it.

Or maybe if Agassi and Graf ever divorce, they can play for the house.🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/49 "2014-08-20T23:42:14Z")

</div>

If you read Chris Evert’s biography she admits that even when she was at her very best her brother who was on his college team beat her regularly.

The difference in upper body strength is just too great a factor

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Idle\_Thoughts](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/838e76/32.png) [@Idle\_Thoughts](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Idle_Thoughts)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/50 "2014-08-20T23:48:40Z")

</div>

I’m going to slide this over to the Game Room…just seems like it fits more there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/51 "2014-08-20T23:51:37Z")

</div>

Fine. Now explain to me why there’s women’s bridge, women’s chess, and women’s billiards. Oh, and women’s bowling too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2014, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/52 "2014-08-20T23:58:16Z")

</div>

I’m with you on that. Some of the best pool players I ever met were women. Watching Jeanette Lee is like watching an artist.  
I honestly think women at the top of their game could compete in the PGA some day. Sure they have a disadvantage on the drives but I’m betting they could easily reach the greens, even on a monster par 5, in 3 to two putt. I’d be very interested in seeing it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 12:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/53 "2014-08-21T00:15:37Z")

</div>

In ski jumping, I’ve read that the men can’t compete with the women. That should be just mixed competition as well.

Racing fortunately already is. Some men predictably whined, “She’s lighter than the rest of us!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 12:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/54 "2014-08-21T00:40:44Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> I’d like to see one tennis event a year that’s mixed competition.

They play mixed doubles (one man and one woman) at every major and at the Hopman Cup.

> [@](#):
>
> Sure, maybe no woman will get past the top 32, but what a story if one does!

It won’t happen.

> [@](#):
>
> Sure, Venus Williams can’t beat the 160th ranked man. That’s because she never plays top male talent!

She probably plays against a male practice partner all the time - and loses all the time. I believe all of the top ranked women do that, and the guys they’re playing are not especially great.

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> But the women _never_ play five sets…why not? can the audience not take the tedium for that long?

Because they never have in the past and there’s no particular movement or reason for them to do so now. (The final match of the year-end tournament used to be best-of-five, but that didn’t last.) They don’t really want to and nobody wants them to - the odd guy who says “THAT’S NO FAIR” doesn’t count for much. If it were up to the sponsors and advertisers, men wouldn’t play best-of-five either. It makes for longer matches and the times are less predictable, which TV doesn’t appreciate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/55 "2014-08-21T13:00:24Z")

</div>

6-1 2-6 6-1 is a fairly common score in a women’s match. Such lopsided scores while not unheard off are much rarer in the men’s game. Matches are much closer usually in the men’s tour.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 1:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/56 "2014-08-21T13:16:19Z")

</div>

> [@zoid](#):
>
> Sure they have a disadvantage on the drives but I’m betting they could easily reach the greens, even on a monster par 5, in 3 to two putt. I’d be very interested in seeing it.

If the men, on average, hit 2 club lengths longer than you, on a par 4, they’re hitting 4 clubs shorter on their second shot, and a par 5, 6 clubs shorter on the 3rd.

Can you get there in 3? Sure, you’re hoping to land on the green with your 3-iron. The men are seeing how close to the pin they can get with their 9-iron.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 2:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/57 "2014-08-21T14:36:15Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> 6-1 2-6 6-1 is a fairly common score in a women’s match. Such lopsided scores while not unheard off are much rarer in the men’s game. Matches are much closer usually in the men’s tour.

Evidence for this would be nice. This might even be true, but I don’t think anyone is analyzing these statistics, which makes the generalization worthless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astorian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@astorian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astorian)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/58 "2014-08-21T14:56:49Z")

</div>

> [@jtur88](#):
>
> I have a (male) friend who watches only women’s basketball, because they are not tall enough to slam-dunk, tney have to play basketball “they way it is supposed to be played”.

You know, I hear this kind of thing a lot, especially from old-timers like the late John Wooden.

“Purists” often say things like, “I prefer the women’s game, because they have better fundamentals and play real defense.”

Well, to each his own. If anyone finds the women’s game more fun to watch, it doesn’t bother me a bit. Your friend is free to watch whatever sports he enjoys.

But the notion that the women’s game has better skills, sounder fundamentals and tougher defenses is not only false, it’s ludicrous! Defenses are far tighter and more varied in the NBA than in the WNBA. The NBA’s point guards are far better passers and ball handlers than the WNBA’s. The men are also much better shooters. The men of the NBA aren’t just bigger, stronger and faster than the ladies of the WNBA, they’re infinitely more skilled as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GargoyleWB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gargoylewb/32/199_2.png) [@GargoyleWB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GargoyleWB)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/59 "2014-08-21T18:17:29Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> Evidence for this would be nice. This might even be true, but I don’t think anyone is analyzing these statistics, which makes the generalization worthless.

I haven’t seen a statistics-mining of the evidence, but I’d agree that mens scores appear more even when looked at from a raw game / set distribution. However, I think this is again a reflection of the different play styles that are dominant in the men’s game vs the women’s game.

The men’s game is one of very strong serves, short rallies, and minimal net game. Breaking the opponent’s serve is much harder in the men’s game. As a result, the men tend to trade game wins, evening out the scores over time. It’s also undesirable to ever ease off in a set because service-break comeback opportunities are so hard-earned.

The women’s service game is much easier to build a net volley strategy around, and more likely to develop into longer rallies. Also, in a best of 3 set scenario, it can definitely be a valid strategy to ease up in the second set if you’ve dominated the first set, instead of struggling for a 2nd set comeback that may unnecessarily tire you out for the 3rd, where you would again want to dominate. This gets legitimately coached in this manner. There are a few booming-serve women that are outliers, but in general the purpose of the women’s serve is to force your advantage in follow-up volleys and rallies _when_ it is returned, not _if_ it is returned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![That\_Don\_Guy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/that_don_guy/32/538_2.png) [@That\_Don\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/That_Don_Guy)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2014, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003/60 "2014-08-21T19:48:47Z")

</div>

> [@kstarnes](#):
>
> Yes it does, of course it does. It’s a type of special privilege that society doesn’t have a problem bestowing upon women. I’m down with it, I don’t have a problem with that. I don’t have a problem with treating women well.
> 
> However, there are a group of professional rabble-rousers who work in media and journalism and academia who are in the business of attacking what they deem “male privilege.” Let’s call these people “Feminist.”
> 
> In that vein, it’s worth pointing out that women earning money playing various professional sports are a protected class, a “privileged class” if you will. I remember the grumbling recently about female tennis players earning less than their male counterparts. I do wonder though, if they would be earning anything at all if they weren’t shielded from male competition.

The point being made was, the crowd was there just as much (if not more, in the days when Venus vs. Serena was almost expected to be the women’s singles final at the U.S. Open) for the women as for the men. For a very long time, the women’s singles winner at Wimbledon got 80% of what the men’s singles winner got.

Note that the lowest paid player in the NBA is guaranteed to make more money per season than the three highest-paid WNBA players combined. So much for privilege!

> [@kstarnes](#):
>
> So, consider a male athlete who’s pretty good but not good enough to be in the men’s professional sports leagues. He may have observed that he’s better than even the best female player in his sport. He won’t be able to compete against them, he won’t be able to earn. He’ll have to do something else. Too bad.
> 
> So, owing to his gender, he can’t earn even though players who might be much inferior are earning millions because of their gender privilege.

This is more “opportunity” than it is “privilege.”

Also, although this isn’t professional sports, in California high schools, girls can’t play on boys’ teams if there are girls teams in the same sport at that school. This wasn’t always the case; in the mid-late 1970s, they didn’t even have “boys teams” - for example, they had a varsity “basketball” team, open to boys and girls, and a varsity “girls basketball” team, open only to girls, but no “boys basketball” team. Eventually, somebody figured out that if a boy and a girl are up for the final spot on an “open” team, the girl can still play the sport if the spot goes to the boy, but the boy can’t if the spot goes to the girl, thus denying the opportunity for the boy to play _merely because he is male_. Note that there are still some sports (for example, field hockey and softball) that have only girls teams, and in the sports that have one team (for example, football and baseball), girls can play.

I wonder if this applies to the NCAA as well - they have “men’s basketball”, and as far as I know, no women have ever played on any NCAA men’s basketball team. Baseball, yes, but it’s not “men’s baseball”. I cannot find any reference in either the NCAA Constitution & Bylaws or the NCAA Men’s & Women’s Basketball Rules that restricts the players of a team to a particular gender.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/does-womens-professional-sport-represent-a-kind-special-female-privilege/696003.md?page=4)
