Doesn't the 2nd Amendment technically forbid ANY federal gun laws?

Then you should really check out the rule against perpetuities.

Let me quote someone: “Hwwwwwaaaahhh? I’m sorry, that just about made my brain explode. :dubious:” Wherever did you get the idea that child pornography isn’t a “class” of speech?

Seeing as how themonuclear devices weren’t invented when Miller was decided, I think it is safe to assume they weren’t protected by Miller. Feel free to substitute “heavy artillery” or some other military weapon of your choosing for the example.

What standard would you have the courts use for all these cases? Rational basis? Strict scrutiny. Something in between? As I’ve said, I’m not a fan of these levels, but I am interested in your view of which standard should be used.

If you want to make a federalism argument about over the issue, feel free. I don’t think it really applies to the District of Columbia, but feel free to convince me otherwise.