# Donald Trump Wins Electoral College Election

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [December 19, 2016, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191 "2016-12-19T23:18:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/41 "2016-12-20T13:19:10Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> So, friends, what’s next on the “I hate Trump and don’t want him to be president” menu? Ask Congress to refuse to certify the electoral college vote totals? Lobby Chief Justice Roberts to refuse to administer the oath of office? Hope he misspeaks while reciting the oath?

Checking for a gold fringe on the flag on Inauguration Day?

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 1:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/42 "2016-12-20T13:24:59Z")

</div>

> [@Omg\_a\_Black\_Conservative](#):
>
> Quoted for future reference.
> 
> You guys and gals have really lost your minds since the election.

Liberal dopers learn from the best (bolding mine):

> [@The official post-Election Day thread:11/7/12](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-official-post-election-day-thread-11-7-12/640177/8):
>
> You really are delusional if you think everything is just fine. **We’re headed straight for a fiscal cliff.** But, as I said, it doesn’t matter either way. If the electorate really is D+6 now then it’s going to be virtually impossible for any Republican to win a presidential election without major outside influence. Being “obstructionists” isn’t going to help them, which is what they’ll be labeled as if they refuse to sign onto any of the Democrat’s ideas. So they should just go along with whatever Democrats want. Either Democrats are right and “their way” will work or it won’t.
> 
> Either way, I would think it’s an idea everyone on this board could agree to.

> [@2016: Obama's America (no, not the stupid movie)](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2016-obamas-america-no-not-the-stupid-movie/641436/2):
>
> Well, we’re **on the cusp of another recession** (the Eurozone is already there), we’re seeing pre-Obamacare layoffs/cutbacks, China is going to gain a lot more leverage over the US as their economy surpasses our own and **we’re going to hit the proverbial cliff sometime soon**. So it’ll be terrible. But as a country we get what we vote for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 1:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/43 "2016-12-20T13:26:50Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Checking for a gold fringe on the flag on Inauguration Day?
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

Okay, I laughed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/budget_player_cadet/32/205_2.png) [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Budget_Player_Cadet)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/44 "2016-12-20T14:16:27Z")

</div>

> [@Omg\_a\_Black\_Conservative](#):
>
> Quoted for future reference.
> 
> You guys and gals have really lost your minds since the election.

Hey, while you’re here, maybe you can tell me… Do you think Trump understood what he was doing with his call to Taiwan and subsequent callouts on twitter? Or did he not understand it at first, and then made a snap judgment to pretend he knew what he was talking about when he made those tweets? Or did he, at no point in the proceedings, know what he was doing or why people were freaking out about it?

Also, have you figured out how this is relevant to the quoted post?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aldiboronti](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@aldiboronti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aldiboronti)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/45 "2016-12-20T16:19:38Z")

</div>

I think he knew exactly what he was doing and thought, why the hell not? And he was right. The Chinese have since stated that the US is too important a partner to let things come between them and they are extremely pleased with Trump’s choice of Ambassador who is a long-standing friend of China.

Why the hell not indeed? Honesty and balls in international affairs is a nice change after Obama’s tepid stewardship.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/46 "2016-12-20T16:22:10Z")

</div>

> [@aldiboronti](#):
>
> Why the hell not indeed? Honesty and balls in international affairs is a nice change after Obama’s tepid stewardship.

Plenty of “honesty and balls” in Obama’s foreign policy, unless you’re defining “honesty and balls” by the John Bolton “WE’RE AMERICA SO FUCK YOU” approach to diplomacy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doorhinge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a5b964/32.png) [@doorhinge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doorhinge)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 4:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/47 "2016-12-20T16:40:17Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> Anyone have the final EC tally? I thought at least 4 or 5 Trump electors would defect elsewhere.

\*There were seven “faithless electors” - the name given to electors who vote contrary to the candidate that won their state - five among Democrats and two for Republicans.

Four Washington state delegates opted not to vote for Clinton, the state’s winner. Three voted for former Secretary of State Colin Powell and one for Faith Spotted Eagle, who had been fighting the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota.

Hawaii elector David Mulinix, a Democrat, cast a ballot for Sanders over Clinton.

“They can call me faithless, but the point is if we don’t think someone’s qualified – and Hillary Clinton I do not feel is qualified,” he said.

Three other electors - in Minnesota, Maine and Colorado - attempted to switch their votes from Clinton but were unsuccessful.

Minnesota elector Muhammad Abdurrahman, a delegate for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders during the primary season, attempted to switch his vote but was replaced by an alternate. Maine elector David Bright attempted to vote for Sanders but was rebuffed and switched his vote to Clinton.

…Recent efforts have put pressure on electors to abandon Trump in favor of Clinton or a GOP replacement. That pressure grew as Clinton’s lead in the popular vote topped 2.6 million\*.

> **[Electoral College final results: 7 'faithless electors;' Trump officially...](https://www.al.com/news/2016/12/electoral_college_live_results.html)**
>
> President-elect Donald Trump received 304 of the Electoral College votes cast today compared to 227 for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, according to the latest tallies.

Pressure? What pressure? Several out of work actors, who make their living pretending to be someone they are not, made a video telling electors that they would stand by them IF THEY CHANGED THEIR VOTE. Of course, if the electors ignored the whining of the out of work actors, the sun will still rise in the East.

The news media also chose to hype the stories of the possibility of electors changing sides. I wonder if any of the Hillary electors would have defected if the media outlets hadn’t repeatedly told them it was OK to change? Oh well, life goes on.

4 in Washington rejected Hillary  
1 in Hawaii rejected Hillary  
1 in Minnesota rejected Hillary  
1 in Maine rejected Hillary.  
1 in Colorado rejected Hillary.  
8 total but several were replaced.

and

2 in Texas rejected Trump.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doorhinge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a5b964/32.png) [@doorhinge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doorhinge)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 4:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/48 "2016-12-20T16:48:35Z")

</div>

> [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](#):
>
> Hey, while you’re here, maybe you can tell me… Do you think Trump understood what he was doing with his call to Taiwan

(post shortened)

The leader of Taiwan called Trump to congratulate Trump on his apparent victory in the race for POTUS. Maybe she’ll call again now that Hillary was once again trounced by Trump in the EC? Since it’s now official.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_Economist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c89c15/32.png) [@Evil\_Economist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Economist)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/49 "2016-12-20T16:59:20Z")

</div>

> [@doorhinge](#):
>
> (post shortened)
> 
> The leader of Taiwan called Trump to congratulate Trump on his apparent victory in the race for POTUS.

According to Donald Trump, a liar, the leader of Taiwan spontaneously called him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/50 "2016-12-20T17:05:15Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> According to [the NYT](http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/19/us/elections/electoral-college-results.html)
> 
> Donald Trump = 304  
> Hillary Clinton = 224  
> Colin Powell = 3  
> John Kasich = 1  
> Ron Paul = 1  
> Faith Spotted Eagle = 1
> 
> We’re missing 4 votes, I’m guessing Hawaii.

> [@ultimate11](#):
>
> My [NY times](http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/19/us/elections/electoral-college-results.html) source has the results. There were more electors that voted against _Clinton_ than Trump, twice more.
> 
> And BTW, in 2004, the rebel vote was (I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again) for “John Ewards”, not John Edwards.

Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/51 "2016-12-20T17:07:08Z")

</div>

> [@doorhinge](#):
>
> \*There were seven “faithless electors” - the name given to electors who vote contrary to the candidate that won their state - five among Democrats and two for Republicans.
> 
> Four Washington state delegates opted not to vote for Clinton, the state’s winner. Three voted for former Secretary of State Colin Powell and one for Faith Spotted Eagle, who had been fighting the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota.
> 
> Hawaii elector David Mulinix, a Democrat, cast a ballot for Sanders over Clinton.
> 
> “They can call me faithless, but the point is if we don’t think someone’s qualified – and Hillary Clinton I do not feel is qualified,” he said.
> 
> Three other electors - in Minnesota, Maine and Colorado - attempted to switch their votes from Clinton but were unsuccessful.
> 
> Minnesota elector Muhammad Abdurrahman, a delegate for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders during the primary season, attempted to switch his vote but was replaced by an alternate. Maine elector David Bright attempted to vote for Sanders but was rebuffed and switched his vote to Clinton.
> 
> …Recent efforts have put pressure on electors to abandon Trump in favor of Clinton or a GOP replacement. That pressure grew as Clinton’s lead in the popular vote topped 2.6 million\*.
> 
> [Electoral College final results: 7 'faithless electors;' Trump officially wins presidency - al.com](http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2016/12/electoral_college_live_results.html)
> 
> Pressure? What pressure? Several out of work actors, who make their living pretending to be someone they are not, made a video telling electors that they would stand by them IF THEY CHANGED THEIR VOTE. Of course, if the electors ignored the whining of the out of work actors, the sun will still rise in the East.
> 
> The news media also chose to hype the stories of the possibility of electors changing sides. I wonder if any of the Hillary electors would have defected if the media outlets hadn’t repeatedly told them it was OK to change? Oh well, life goes on.
> 
> 4 in Washington rejected Hillary  
> 1 in Hawaii rejected Hillary  
> 1 in Minnesota rejected Hillary  
> 1 in Maine rejected Hillary.  
> 1 in Colorado rejected Hillary.  
> 8 total but several were replaced.
> 
> and
> 
> 2 in Texas rejected Trump.

Thanks!

So… 304-227-7?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wesley\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wesley_clark/32/20581_2.png) [@Wesley\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wesley_Clark)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/52 "2016-12-20T21:17:10Z")

</div>

> [@octopus](#):
>
> Just for the record you are a fan of gridlock and states’ rights now?

Yup. I’m what is known as a hypocrite. But at least I’m honest about it.

I believe whatever pushes my values (within reason). When states rights do that, I support them. When they do not, I do not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![buddha\_david](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ee7513/32.png) [@buddha\_david](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/buddha_david)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/53 "2016-12-20T22:23:25Z")

</div>

> [@doorhinge](#):
>
> 4 in Washington rejected Hillary  
> 1 in Hawaii rejected Hillary  
> 1 in Minnesota rejected Hillary  
> 1 in Maine rejected Hillary.  
> 1 in Colorado rejected Hillary.  
> 8 total but several were replaced.
> 
> and
> 
> 2 in Texas rejected Trump.

It’s a much, much bigger deal to reject the winning candidate than the losing candidate. There’s absolutely zero chance that any Trump electors will defect to Clinton, so why not make a statement? An ineffectual and soon-forgotten protest, but hey, that’s part and parcel with being American. I am a bit chagrined that so many Clinton electors chose to make ineffectual protests, but as I said before, most of them appear to be protesting the Electoral system itself, not Clinton specifically.

But with Trump electors, every changed vote raises the risk of making your candidate lose. How did those two Texan electors know that 35 other electors wouldn’t revolt? Did they know?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/54 "2016-12-20T22:36:05Z")

</div>

> [@buddha\_david](#):
>
> But with Trump electors, every changed vote raises the risk of making your candidate lose. How did those two Texan electors know that 35 other electors wouldn’t revolt? Did they know?

As long as Trump electors weren’t voting for Hillary, they could protest-vote all they wanted with no fear of throwing the election. Even if Trump fell below 270, it would still send the election to a Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![buddha\_david](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ee7513/32.png) [@buddha\_david](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/buddha_david)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/55 "2016-12-20T22:44:59Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> Even if Trump fell below 270, it would still send the election to a Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

How can you be so certain the House won’t select someone who _didn’t_ receive the most electoral votes? [It’s happened before.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1824)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2016, 10:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/56 "2016-12-20T22:53:04Z")

</div>

> [@buddha\_david](#):
>
> How can you be so certain the House won’t select someone who _didn’t_ receive the most electoral votes? [It’s happened before.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1824)

Yes, but at least it would most likely be a Republican - Trump or no Trump. So the Trump electors had little to fear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evan\_Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b487fb/32.png) [@Evan\_Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evan_Drake)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2016, 12:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/57 "2016-12-21T00:26:50Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Liberals are “historically despised” by conservatives who have been forced to stop doing things like polluting the air and water, forcing people to work in unsafe conditions, discriminating against people based on race, religion or gender, and sending in armies of hired goons to beat up union members. Because liberals are mean like that.

Yeah yeah. By your standards I would be hard left, if Bernie’s a communist. I never noticed any difference between Democrats and Republicans when it came to oppressing the common man back in the Gilded Age. Most of those things you laud were — inadequately enough — done by _progressives_, some of whom were Republican such as Teddy or Nixon even; the Democratic Party is rarely in lockstep with progressives, whom it regards as socialists and hippies who rock the boat.

> [@buddha\_david](#):
>
> It’s a much, much bigger deal to reject the winning candidate than the losing candidate. There’s absolutely zero chance that any Trump electors will defect to Clinton, so why not make a statement? An ineffectual and soon-forgotten protest, but hey, that’s part and parcel with being American. I am a bit chagrined that so many Clinton electors chose to make ineffectual protests, but as I said before, most of them appear to be protesting the Electoral system itself, not Clinton specifically.
> 
> But with Trump electors, every changed vote raises the risk of making your candidate lose. How did those two Texan electors know that 35 other electors wouldn’t revolt? Did they know?

Actually… if one hoped for a reversal of fortune for Hillary, it was a far bigger deal that _her_ electors flipped. Suppose 34 other electors flipped then those 5 votes would have given her the presidency; yet those 5 votes are wasted as it is: had they stayed with her she would have more of a case of being an alternate winner.  
As far as protests go, I rather doubt Electors to the Electoral College object to the existence of the Electoral College.

> [@doorhinge](#):
>
> 2 in Texas rejected Trump.

He was too much of a commie for Texas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![buddha\_david](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ee7513/32.png) [@buddha\_david](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/buddha_david)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2016, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/58 "2016-12-21T01:07:06Z")

</div>

> [@Evan\_Drake](#):
>
> Suppose 34 other electors flipped then those 5 votes would have given her the presidency; yet those 5 votes are wasted as it is: had they stayed with her she would have more of a case of being an alternate winner.

No GOP elector would have voted for Hillary. P.E.R.I.O.D. Democrats can get away with silly thing like voting for Colin Powell, but Republicans are downright fanatical about party solidarity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evan\_Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b487fb/32.png) [@Evan\_Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evan_Drake)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2016, 1:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/59 "2016-12-21T01:32:04Z")

</div>

Perhaps their party discipline is soviet, yet I read a good deal how their revulsion to the vulgar demagogue Donald would swing the vote to whomever the speaker personally preferred.  
Still what was good enough for that vile little fellow Romney, type of regular Republicanism, who mucksmattered Trump as rival, then came a-crawling post-election, was no doubt good enough for them.

Still don’t see how Trump can be not preferable to Cruz, Romney, Walker or Ryan as pressie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![octopus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/octopus/32/3716_2.png) [@octopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/octopus)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2016, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191/60 "2016-12-21T01:42:08Z")

</div>

> [@Wesley\_Clark](#):
>
> Yup. I’m what is known as a hypocrite. But at least I’m honest about it.
> 
> I believe whatever pushes my values (within reason). When states rights do that, I support them. When they do not, I do not.

It’s scary you don’t recognize the importance of consistency in law or precedent. You shouldn’t run a country according to short term whimsy.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trump-wins-electoral-college-election/775191.md?page=4)
