# Donald Trump's 2016 General Election Campaign

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901
**Category:** Politics & Elections
**Created:** [May 4, 2016, 2:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901 "2016-05-04T02:37:34Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 296

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 10:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5903 "2016-09-07T10:54:30Z")

</div>

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> Renormalizing\* …
> 
> - is that a word? If so, did I even use it correctly?

The Republicans called it “skewing” in the Romney campaign. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 10:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5904 "2016-09-07T10:56:04Z")

</div>

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> The Dallas Morning News did a first: a condemnation of one party’s candidate before they announce who they are endorsing.
> 
> [http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20160906-donald-trump-is-no-republican.ece](http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20160906-donald-trump-is-no-republican.ece)

The Dallas Morning News endorses Hillary Clinton for President.

[http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/dallas-morning-news-endorses-clinton-for-president-227815](http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/dallas-morning-news-endorses-clinton-for-president-227815)

I should call my contacts there and congratulate them!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![coremelt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4491bb/32.png) [@coremelt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/coremelt)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 11:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5905 "2016-09-07T11:04:34Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> We have third party candidates thrown into the mix for people who just hate the system

Unfortunately a chunk of those that just hate the system will vote Trump, some because they stupidly believe Trump will reform the system, and some because they know Trump is dangerous and reckless and they just want to see the world burn ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 11:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5906 "2016-09-07T11:48:35Z")

</div>

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> [http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/donald-trump-poll-cnn-msnbc-227804#ixzz4JXM92f84](http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/donald-trump-poll-cnn-msnbc-227804#ixzz4JXM92f84)
> 
> So, looking at that CNN poll, it was noticed that they _heavily_ sampled uneducated white voters, essentially making them 1/2 of the population. Renormalizing\* the results to match the 2012 electorate, it is found that Clinton is actually +4.
> 
> - is that a word? If so, did I even use it correctly?

That could be true, and I would agree that the CNN poll, in and of itself, doesn’t actually mean that Trump is leading in the polls. In fact his “lead” is plainly within the statistical margin of error. But the polls do show that the race is almost or perhaps a statistical dead heat nationally when taking other recent polls into consideration.

I think we’re seeing two things at play here: 1) Trump has managed to keep himself under control, and 2) Hillary Clinton has had some really bad press the last few weeks - some of it self-inflicted. It is still possible, perhaps likely, that Trump will stumble again. But I suspect that this is when the race truly begins. People are now going to start paying attention and the large number of undecided voters is going to get split in ways that are difficult to predict.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 11:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5907 "2016-09-07T11:54:25Z")

</div>

> [@coremelt](#):
>
> Unfortunately a chunk of those that just hate the system will vote Trump, some because they stupidly believe Trump will reform the system, and some because they know Trump is dangerous and reckless and they just want to see the world burn ☹

I suspect Trump’s supporters will consist of the following:

- The angry legion of uneducated white voters (the most committed)

- Those who hate Hillary Clinton

- Those who hate liberal democrats like Barack Obama

- Those who are somewhat neutral but don’t keep up with politics and are influenced by social media.

Most of these will be white, though not necessarily poor and not what would necessarily call ‘uneducated’. However, a lot of what passes for ‘education’ in this country is pretty sad.

People who confident about Hillary Clinton’s chances are using the previous elections of 2012 and 2008 as reference points. I suspect, however, that those elections are not reference points. They were warning signs. They served to warn us that a growing number of people in this country are completely incompetent voters. And my fear is that unlike the last two elections, minority voters are not going to be as enthusiastic to support Hillary Clinton as they were to vote for Obama.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 12:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5908 "2016-09-07T12:00:38Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> And my fear is that unlike the last two elections, minority voters are not going to be as enthusiastic to support Hillary Clinton as they were to vote for Obama.

You’d think so, but the diffence _to me_ between 95% and 99% poll numbers between Obama versus Clinton is not that 4%, but that voting against Clinton is so unthinkable that that is bound to translate into extra enthusiasm amongst the other 95%. If the alternative is so bad that it convinced that extra 4%, some of the other 95% are bound to hate the other guy extra extra bad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 12:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5909 "2016-09-07T12:13:50Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> The Republicans called it “skewing” in the Romney campaign. 😉

You mean _un_skewing.

ETA: Though in all seriousness, finding a demographic makeup in a poll that just doesn’t reflect reality is much more legit than what the Romney dreamers were doing. They were claiming those polls had “too many Democrats”–i.e., begging the question. But ethnic groups are measurable and pretty much unchanging throughout an individual’s life.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MacCat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/maccat/32/216_2.png) [@MacCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MacCat)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 12:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5910 "2016-09-07T12:26:16Z")

</div>

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> By the way, I’m using voice recognition more and more. So I do apologize for any minor mistakes I make in writing these posts.

Please don’t apologize for anything as entertaining as…

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> My butt is on Hillary. But I would say that wouldn’t I?

Though I’d rather your butt was on Trump…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 12:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5911 "2016-09-07T12:29:07Z")

</div>

But… but… but… that’s not what I meant! 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Derleth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Derleth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Derleth)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 12:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5912 "2016-09-07T12:56:48Z")

</div>

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> Renormalizing\*
> 
> - is that a word? If so, did I even use it correctly?

It is in quantum mechanics, believe it or not: It’s a way to remove infinities from mathematical models of quantum phenomena. [John Baez has a good non-mathematical account of it here](http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/renormalization.html); it’s good physics (usually), in that we often get good theories out of it, but the idea of “renormalizing” polls makes me imagine potential voters being surrounded by hazy fields of virtual potential voters, all interacting with each other and saying variably insane political opinions, based on how far their energies are from the median…

In short, renormalization is, despite the objections of early physicists, useful; unskewing polls is a deliberate denial of reality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 1:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5913 "2016-09-07T13:02:06Z")

</div>

Thanks, and I love the imagery.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 1:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5914 "2016-09-07T13:24:58Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> …my fear is that unlike the last two elections, minority voters are not going to be as enthusiastic to support Hillary Clinton as they were to vote for Obama.

Blacks, I agree, but Latinos are _'way_ more motivated to vote against Trump than they ever were against Romney or McCain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Derleth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Derleth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Derleth)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 2:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5915 "2016-09-07T14:19:04Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> Blacks, I agree, but Latinos are _'way_ more motivated to vote against Trump than they ever were against Romney or McCain.

“Where did you go, Marco Rubio, the GOPpers turn their lonely eyes to you…”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5916 "2016-09-07T14:54:37Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> Blacks, I agree, but Latinos are _'way_ more motivated to vote against Trump than they ever were against Romney or McCain.

I’ll believe that when I see it. Latinos are like young voters, supposedly more motivated than usual in many cycles but it almost never happens. Actually, in the case of young voters it happened once. In the case of Latinos, we’re still waiting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5917 "2016-09-07T15:00:19Z")

</div>

Some people seem to think that I’ve jumped on the Trump bandwagon. No, no, hell no. But I do have a different problem: I still support my Senate Republicans and most of them should outperform Trump, but are going to need a close Presidential race to hold the Senate. So yes, I am rooting for Trump to keep it close, but a Trump victory would be disastrous for all of us. But a Trump loss by about how much Romney lost has two benefits:

1. It probably helps the GOP keep the Senate
2. It probably scares the hell out of voters in both parties to the point where hopefully we’ll see smarter voter behavior in the future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5918 "2016-09-07T15:16:32Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> \<snip\>2) It probably scares the hell out of voters in both parties to the point where hopefully we’ll see smarter voter behavior in the future.\</snip\>

I think it’s more important that Trump is defeated in a landslide. This may prevent a candidate like him from trying to run in the future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 3:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5919 "2016-09-07T15:33:30Z")

</div>

> [@enipla](#):
>
> I think it’s more important that Trump is defeated in a landslide. This may prevent a candidate like him from trying to run in the future.

I doubt that’s true.

But the results of Trump winning could well prevent a candidate like him from winning again any time in the near future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jack\_Batty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jack_batty/32/3201_2.png) [@Jack\_Batty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jack_Batty)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5920 "2016-09-07T15:56:39Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Some people seem to think that I’ve jumped on the Trump bandwagon. No, no, hell no. But I do have a different problem: I still support my Senate Republicans and most of them should outperform Trump, but are going to need a close Presidential race to hold the Senate. So yes, I am rooting for Trump to keep it close, but a Trump victory would be disastrous for all of us. But a Trump loss by about how much Romney lost has two benefits:
> 
> 1. It probably helps the GOP keep the Senate
> 2. It probably scares the hell out of voters in both parties to the point where hopefully we’ll see smarter voter behavior in the future.

So all your “analysis” is so much wishful thinking bullshit after all? Gee whiz, color me shocked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5921 "2016-09-07T16:32:21Z")

</div>

> [@Jack\_Batty](#):
>
> So all your “analysis” is so much wishful thinking bullshit after all? Gee whiz, color me shocked.

[Moderating]

Tone it down a little, please. This isn’t the Pit. No warning, but from now on remember what forum you’re in.

RickJay  
Moderator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2016, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901/5922 "2016-09-07T16:57:43Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> 1. It probably scares the hell out of voters in both parties to the point where hopefully we’ll see smarter voter behavior in the future.

So the solution is to encourage just barely not enough voters to pull for an objectively **terrible** choice in the hope that they’ll be smarter in the future?

That’s like a doctor telling a patient to gain 300 pounds in the hope that diabetes and a triple bypass will encourage him to lose weight afterwards.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901.md?page=295)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/donald-trumps-2016-general-election-campaign/753901.md?page=297)
