# "Don't call me 'cisgender'!"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [April 30, 2015, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903 "2015-04-30T15:23:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hershele\_Ostropoler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e47c2d/32.png) [@Hershele\_Ostropoler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hershele_Ostropoler)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/321 "2015-05-04T21:46:14Z")

</div>

> [@Starving\_Artist](#):
>
> You’re not the first person in this thread to equate dislike of the term “cisgender” with desire or support for discrimination and oppression. I’ve certainly said nothing to indicate that I favor either, and in point of fact I don’t.

But you think trans people are abnormal and unnatural. Do you at least understand why I think that, since you consider trans peple abnormal and unnatural, you might be less than full-throated in your opposition to discrimination and oppression? Do you recognize that it is reasonably predictable that when you say “these people are normal, and those people are not,” many of those people – and many of their friends and supporters among these people – will understand you to be saying that those people are lesser in some way?

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> 1. Is the fact that atypical people face irrational bigotry reason enough to discard all pretense as to normalcy as it pertains to human behavior, orientation, and attributes? Further, why is a distinct term necessary rather than just one doesn’t have X?

… yes? Because bigotry, at last in the form of treating a group of people as second-class citizens, frequently involves perceiving them as a deviation from a notional unmarked neutral state. Normal people and gays. Normal people and bisexuals. Normal people and disabled people. Normal people and black people. Normal people and Asians. Normal people and women. Normal people and trans people. All of those dichotomies are strongly associated with the idea that excluding or overlooking people in whichever group is being postulated as in opposition to “normal” is, if not desirable, at least acceptable.

In other words, the attitudes underlying bigotry are a lot easier to maintain when one doesn’t believe the characteristic in question applies to oneself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 9:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/322 "2015-05-04T21:48:36Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Taking peoples words out of context:" It doesnt make any difference. _If even a few people use “cis” as a pejorative slur,_ and only a few people think being called one is insulting, then we shouldn’t use it."

Out of context? The context was me pointing out that not a single one of your cites actually said what you claimed they said. You ignored all of that, and responded with, “It doesn’t make a difference.” I think I’ve got the context pretty well nailed the fuck down in that exchange.

Incidentally, while I’ve got your attention. You were asked this, like, five times, and never answered: if someone uses the phrase “Die, black scum,” does that mean that “black” is a slur that nobody should ever use?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/323 "2015-05-04T21:53:14Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Out of context? The context was me pointing out that not a single one of your cites actually said what you claimed they said. You ignored all of that, and responded with, “It doesn’t make a difference.” I think I’ve got the context pretty well nailed the fuck down in that exchange.

Again, there were more words after that phrase: \*It doesnt make any difference. If even a few people use “cis” as a pejorative slur, and only a few people think being called one is insulting, then we shouldn’t use it."  
\*

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polerius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d78d45/32.png) [@Polerius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polerius)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/324 "2015-05-04T21:53:27Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> As a descriptivist, the term “cisgender” is chiefly useful in that, as a newly minted term, it has almost no baggage attached to it.

[No baggage at all…](http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/die-cis-scum)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/325 "2015-05-04T21:55:11Z")

</div>

I am done. Taking terms out of context, personal insults- this is not a debate, it’s a lynchmob.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/326 "2015-05-04T21:57:51Z")

</div>

> [@Polerius](#):
>
> [No baggage at all…](http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/die-cis-scum)

He said “almost no”. Why are you misinterpreting him?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/327 "2015-05-04T21:59:03Z")

</div>

> [@Polerius](#):
>
> [No baggage at all…](http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/die-cis-scum)

There’s about three hundred posts between that one and where we are now. You might want to catch up before post further.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/328 "2015-05-04T22:00:00Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> I am done. Taking terms out of context, personal insults- this is not a debate, it’s a lynchmob.

Still can’t answer the question about, “Die, black scum,” can you?

That’s okay. Nobody expected that you would.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/329 "2015-05-04T22:00:17Z")

</div>

> [@Polerius](#):
>
> [No baggage at all…](http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/die-cis-scum)

[Is there an echo in here?](http://readingisfundamental.org/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polerius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d78d45/32.png) [@Polerius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polerius)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/330 "2015-05-04T22:01:09Z")

</div>

At the risk of being insensitive, how wrong is it to use “normal” to describe non-transgender people?

Definition of normal

> [@](#):
>
> nor·mal
> 
> adjective: usual, typical, or expected.  
> noun: the usual, average, or typical state or condition

As per [this site](http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/how-many-people-are-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender/), there are 700,000 transgender individuals in the US.

This means that around 0.2% of the population are transgender, which means that cisgender is the “usual, average, or typical state” of gender identification in the US, thus the normal state of gender identification.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/331 "2015-05-04T22:05:19Z")

</div>

> [@Polerius](#):
>
> At the risk of being insensitive, how wrong is it to use “normal” to describe non-transgender people?

So, now we have evidence that you didn’t read the other half of the thread, either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/332 "2015-05-04T22:11:57Z")

</div>

> [@Polerius](#):
>
> At the risk of being insensitive, how wrong is it to use “normal” to describe non-transgender people?
> 
> Definition of normal  
> As per [this site](http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/how-many-people-are-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender/), there are 700,000 transgender individuals in the US.
> 
> This means that around 0.2% of the population are transgender, which means that cisgender is the “usual, average, or typical state” of gender identification in the US, thus the normal state of gender identification.

So let’s entertain that “normal” is an adequate descriptor. Is it the only descriptor one could use or should use?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![usedtobe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ec9cab/32.png) [@usedtobe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/usedtobe)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/333 "2015-05-04T22:17:42Z")

</div>

“Almost no baggage”

yeah, right - we are now also re-defining “almost”.

When a term has a pejorative sense and those so labelled object, I would call that “baggage”.

Don’t call me “cis” AND expect me to give a damn about what you are called.

If I do not deserve respect, why, exactly, do you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/334 "2015-05-04T22:18:57Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> I am done. Taking terms out of context, personal insults- this is not a debate, it’s a lynchmob.

Well, now I’m confused. I thought we **weren’t** supposed to be labeling groups without their permission.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/335 "2015-05-04T22:19:25Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> So let’s entertain that “normal” is an adequate descriptor. Is it the only descriptor one could use or should use?

It makes me laugh to recognize that “normal” would require usage like “Chaz Bono is a transgender man. Hitler was a normal man.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/336 "2015-05-04T22:22:31Z")

</div>

> [@usedtobe](#):
>
> If I do not deserve respect, why, exactly, do you?

Because I don’t throw temper tantrums over clinical terminology, that’s why.

However, you are right. When a term has a pejorative sense and those so labelled object, it is right to avoid the term. Since neither condition applies to ‘cisgender’ the conclusion does not follow, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/337 "2015-05-04T22:26:11Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> It makes me laugh to recognize that “normal” would require usage like “Chaz Bono is a transgender man. Hitler was a normal man.”

Well, by the very limited definitions of “normal” Polerius offers and in the very specific context of physical sexuality’s alignment with self-perceived gender, those two statements would be consistent.

Of course, “normal” is far more broadly used than the very limited definitions Polerius offers, so insistence on the term to the exclusion of any other term, even one as banal as “cis”, strikes me as unnecessary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/338 "2015-05-04T22:27:54Z")

</div>

> [@Inner\_Stickler](#):
>
> Well, now I’m confused. I thought we **weren’t** supposed to be labeling groups without their permission.

You mean you didn’t sign your Lynchmob Descriptor Release Form? Geez, get on the ball, DrDeth sent them out a whole week ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brickbacon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/898d66/32.png) [@brickbacon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brickbacon)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/339 "2015-05-04T22:36:35Z")

</div>

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> Because that’s how clinical/academic terms work, always and in every field ?

First, as it has been said 1000 times, we are not talking about clinical academic work. Second, your statement is not at all true. Please give me a specific, clinical term for someone without body integrity identity disorder or progeria or rabies?

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> The very concept of “normalcy” is coercive in nature. Is normal what follows an enforced norm.

Nonsense. Normalcy isn’t coercive because humans by and large do not dictate what is normal in terms of genetics. The above statement is utter nonsense.

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> After all, defining a “new normal” worked for gays (kinda, but to a growing extent), no reason to exclude transfolk from the process.

I don’t think there is a real new normal for gays, and even if there were, there needs to be a basic threshold in terms of numbers before we collectively engage these processes. For example, if one guy thinks he was meant to be a catfish, should we all classify ourselves as non-catfish just for his sake?

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> Or do/did you feel likewise threatened by the fact that a handful of decades ago, some utter \*bastards \*turned you from “normal” or “no word required” into a heterosexual ?

I contend that such a thing generally didn’t happen as their was no established question. There is a difference between such distinctions arising due to a new question being asked (eg. sexual orientation) rather than redefining a term like gender specifically for a infinitesimal minority of the public. .

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> As has already been stated, because the absence of a term is not clear enough. “male” could mean “cisgendered male” or “transmale”. Adding “cis” eliminates ambiguity.

Okay explain what someone with ambiguous genitalia would classify as, and why the cisgender part would be illuminating?

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> Pick a side, mate. Either it’s poorly understood or it’s mainstream. It can’t really be both.

Sure it can. They are not at all opposites. For example: black holes, relativity, jihad, etc.

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> And how is it misused, exactly ?

I’ve (and others have) explained this multiple times.

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> You mean like “right-handed” ? Or “heterosexual” ? Or “neurotypical” ? Or… you get the point. That’s how cladistics work. No classifiable \*thing \*will be left unclassified !

None of those things are rare. Do you even read what you are responding to?

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> Yer wot ? I’m not sure what you’re talking about here.

There are multiple [diseases](http://www.merckmanuals.com/home/older-people-s-health-issues/the-aging-body/disorders-of-accelerated-aging) and illnesses that rapidly age people or make them age abnormally. The trans movement wishes to argue that the fact that trans people largely do not conform to normal gender identities means the concept as a whole is largely invalid or at least too inclusive to be a meaningful representation of our natural diversity. That is, that the terms male and female are not inclusive enough or illustrative of all we see before us.

Similarly, you can make argument that while age in years in a factual assertion based on the passage of time, the concept is partially invalid because the information we glean from that number can vary widely due to biological diversity. Just as the terms male and female are clear and inclusive terms for almost 99%+ of the population, so would an age in years be informative and elucidative for 99%+ of the population.

Additionally, you can argue that the term male is just as loaded and assumptive a term as it relates to trans people as an specific age would be as it related to people with progeria. However, no one would argue we need to mark our years with a specific reference to the fact that we don’t suffer from a rapid-aging illness despite the fact that such people suffer as trans people do, and because the normal language for how we discuss issues related to their plight have the means to render them invisible.

In short, why should I mark my gender identity to specifically state I am not suffering from a rare condition when I don’t have to do that for my age, height, or anything else?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2015, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903/340 "2015-05-04T22:40:40Z")

</div>

Just out of curiosity, how many men in the thread want to be called “men” given [this](https://twitter.com/search?q=%23killallmen&src=hash)?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903.md?page=16)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dont-call-me-cisgender/718903.md?page=18)
