To the cartoon character of Muhammad, who was ‘responsible’ for the violence but never meant to hurt anyone. Look how bad he feels, poor little guy.
Hmm, I wonder how that’s going to go over with the “We is Chuck” folks that before this thought the French were just “cheese eating surrender monkeys”?
CMC fnord!
I interpreted it as the cartoonist apparently intended, as the magazine forgiving the terrorists. But I like this interpretation, too.
This. If you look at it upside down, it’s a giant dick. I think that makes their intent obvious.
It makes somebody’s intent obvious, that’s for sure.
Paging Dr. Freud…
Hi, another French person here.
My interpretation is similar to BigT’s “most natural meaning of the cartoon”. I don’t think that Luz intended, at any point, to imply that French Muslims who have spoken in favor of Charlie and who have joined the march are hypocrites who have been shedding crocodile tears.
As for the instrumentalization of both the march and the slogan for political purposes, I haven’t been able to find a copy of Charlie Hebdo either yesterday or this morning, but I don’t doubt that they’ll address it with all the sarcasm and venom at their disposal, the way they always did.
I for one think the cartoon is ambiguous enough to allow various interpretations, similar to an optical illusion.
One thing to keep in mind is that it’s the same caricature (in a different pose) that was used in the cover cartoon that the terrorists were supposedly insulted by. So if it was intended that the turban look like a penis or a butt or whatever, it may not be tied to this particular cartoon.