I’ve only been plagued by mine on a few occasions. The voices are angry, very critical of me, and the experience is frightening and humiliating. I assume the voices come from a part of the inside of my head where I normally keep the most self-critical stuff, i.e., that they are not some kind of meaningless neuro-static and that it is a biologically and mentally healthy (even if unpleasant) part of inner reflection.
I can’t say that I recognized the voice(s) as anyone in particular. More a blend of different people. Definitely bits of my father in there, and my mother. But more like a composite archetype than a familiar “oh, it’s you” kind of presence. Seeing traces of real people I know is something that occurred in retrospect, it didn’t seem like them when it was happening.
You can’t distance yourself emotionally from the voices and argue with them or tell them to fuck off because the emotional intensity of the voices is YOUR emotional intensity and they cut right into you.
And, for that reason, the voices ARE REAL.
Yes, there’s an upside to it, in the same sense that crying or raging is healthier than keeping misery and anger bottled up. Letting it happen, processing it out, is good for you. And anything’s better than numbness.
I have received a diagnosis of “paranoid schizophrenic” (among others less lurid and spectacular) but I do not take psych meds, I do not see a psychiatrist, and I am in fact part of the psychiatric consumers’/survivors’/ex-inmates’ liberation movement that opposes forced treatment.
In many ways I am in agreement with poor TVAA but strategically I think it is a waste of energy trying to get people to consider the possibility that there is no such thing as “mental illness”. There’s no way a bunch of radical schizzies with no labs or strong biomed credentials are going to pull off the PR upset that that would require. It’s not important anyway – the important thing is to establish that whether our “difference” is bioneurological or cultural or whatever, it is only a “disease” to the extent that we wish to be cured of it. You don’t need labs to be able to address the world and say “We’re like this and we’re not going to hide it and guess what, we like who we are and we’re tired of having our difference defined as a disease”.
But I do think that at the most some people have an innate disposition that makes them more likely to end up in certain problematic mental states than other people. I think the mental states themselves are better thought of as adjectives than nouns – rather than “He is a schizophrenic” or “he has schizophrenia”, think in terms of “He is kind of schizophrenic today”. And I do think that anyone, under at least some circumstances, can be in those frames of mind and exhibit those behaviors. As I said, though, I could be wrong and if so, if we’re really different, …so what? We’re still citizens and if we choose to embrace our difference and demand equal protection and, along with it, some civilized respect, who is entitled to define our difference as a sickness?