Saying “you’re 21” doesn’t have to mean you’re exactly 21… it can mean you’re over 21 or you’ve passed your 21st birthday.
As we used to say Back When, “I can do what I want–I’m free, white, and 21!”
No offense intended to any racial or age groups. Mentioned for historical purposes only.
[QUOTE=ThelmaLou]
As we used to say Back When, “I can do what I want–I’m free, white, and 21!”
No offense intended to any racial or age groups. Mentioned for historical purposes only.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve had to stop myself from saying that so many times out of concern “They might not be familiar with that saying”. Politically correct or not, things you heard all the time in childhood have a way of sticking with you. (A thematically similar comment I’ve heard from black people “of a certain age” when told that they have to do something is “The only things I have to do are be black and die”, so it’s kind of reassuring it isn’t just a white thing to mention race in a retort.)
Re. the “suck up” parlance. This reminded me that in one scene Lord G. very obviously looked at the time on his wrist[watch] and said, “Good Lord, is that the time already?” It struck me as a possible anachronism. My very cursory research (on wikipedia, ha) says only that wristwatches “became popular in the 1920’s”. Would Lord G. have been sporting one in 1919? What do you think?
Other observations about the dreckiness of Season 2 / last night’s ep:
The handling of the 'flu sweeping through the manor seemed poorly done. Everyone got it at once? The relatively isolated population of the manor house got it? Would it not sweep through the masses / peasantry first and the resultant mortality rate be much more alarming than Dr. Clarkson’s demeanor conveyed? Seemed pretty contrived.
Throughout this season, the servants’ lives seem to have become more and more filled with free time to romp off and go into town, go travelling, go visiting, go to parties, observances, concerts, weddings, funerals, try out different roles in jobs, feed the local urchins, and so forth. I know a recurring theme of the series is the changing face of the servant class and the crumbling of the rigid separation of servant / master, but come on! Their lives seem like they’re all at summer camp in the basement.
The pacing / screenplay of the whole season seems a bit off on some of the subplots. For example, the Branson thing on last night’s ep. They meet in the garage, pledge love. Some scene where they come out to the world. They run off. Sybil is fetched back, pledging love (with Anna in tow, I might add; see above). It’s sort of unclear where Branson goes. Lord G. talks to him in a subsequent scene. There’s talk with Sybil at dinner. Branson shows up at the funeral. Showdown. Reconciliation. None of the timing of this is settled with me. It seems like working class bloke Branson just waltzes in whenever a dramatic moment is needed, with no regard for the undoubtedly difficult travel logistics an unemployed man must face.
Very contrived exposition. For example: “Mother’s taken ill. Lavinia’s taken ill. Granny went home. Father is with mother. Sybil is seeing to mother. Edith’s gone for a walk. So, I guess it’s just you and me, Matthew, here in the room with the Victrola. And you with your newly working legs and stuff.”
Seems like these sorts of bits could be a bit subtler
Nice. Shamelesly stolen from this scathing Guardian review of the final episode of season two
[What’s ahead in season three:]
Lady Cora deciding she’s a lesbian and having an affair with Virginia Woolf. Lady Edith rushing off to Germany to befriend Hitler in jail. Lady Sybil joining the IRA. Lady Mary deciding that she’s actually Anastasia, the daughter of Tsar Nicholas. Lord Grantham taking legal advice to prevent Sir Richard disclosing the details of his grope. And Carson having the heart attack for which he has been waiting so long. .
When Sybil told Branson her answer was “yes” I distinctly remember she said nothing at all about “love.” She explained that the answer was yes because she realized Branson could give her the life that she really wanted. But love was not mentioned at that time. Did she speak of loving him later? I don’t specifically recall. Or maybe someone else can tell me if she later talked of loving Branson?
Not at all impossible, although I think a pocket watch would have been more usual. But during World War I, wristwatches were manufactured (e.g., by Gallet) for military use, and high-end horlogers like Cartier and Girard Perregaux quickly took over the design in fancier forms for wealthy civilians as well.
So yeah, wealthy nobleman with wristwatch in 1919 doesn’t strain credulity too much. But it would have been bigger and clunkier than a modern wristwatch.
Look for the Silver Lining: Matthew said he thinks the song is from a flop, but fictional characters aren’t always right. Also, although the episode starts in 1919, there is a title card that reads “three months later”, and Lavinia mentions that the wedding is to take place in “April”, so we could be into 1920 by the time of Matthew’s comment. However, I haven’t yet found data on the timing of new cases of Spanish flu breaking out in the UK in 1920.
Breakfast after the night of Sybil & Branson’s attempted elopement:
Lord G is eating alone, as Sybil is “still indisposed”, Mary and Edith aren’t down yet and Lady G has gone to meet Isobel. Carson takes the chafing dish of kedgeree(?) back to kitchen to keep it warm. Jane comes in and tells Lord G she thinks he would be happier if she tendered her resignation. Lord G won’t accept it, saying she shouldn’t suffer because he behaved in an “ungentlemanly manner”. Carson, off-stage, clears his throat, and re-enters the breakfast room. Has he overheard Lord G? More importantly, would he have mentioned this to Mrs. Hughes?
[QUOTE=PeskiPiksi]
…So it was established that Lady Sybil is 21 in 1919. Didn’t we see her first Season in the first series? If women usually “came out” at age eighteen (maybe that’s where I’m off here…)
[/quote]
I think it varied, but it was from 16 to 18.
[QUOTE=PeskiPiksi]
[Sybil’s] debut Season was the winter after the Titanic sank…
[/quote]
Cite? I kid, I kid. I ask because I’m confused about it myself. I thought we heard Edith’s coming out mentioined during the first series. I don’t remember hearing about Sybil’s first season. Anyway, as others had metioned, I don’t think Sybil must needs be exactly 21 years old in 1919/20. Although, all my surmising about timelines may be shown to be faulty now that raindrop has located the thread about Series 1. Thanks, raindrop!
[QUOTE=PeskiPiksi]
And isn’t Lady Mary well into spinsterhood by now?
[/quote]
Yup, which is why she’s “settling” by marrying Sir Richard. Further, the loss of so many men in the war has limited her, and even younger women’s, marital opportunities.
You’re right that Isobel won’t acquire a title when Matthew becomes Earl, but I’m sure that, should the Dowager Countess be so inclined as to drop a word into the right ear, one would not be surprised to find a certain name on the Christmas honours list.
[QUOTE=drpepper]
{snip} The handling of the 'flu sweeping through the manor seemed poorly done. Everyone got it at once?..
[/quote]
I’m having difficulty finding data on the direction in which the S.F. spread. The Wikipedia entry said returning military personnel were a vector. Given that Downton was used as a hospital…but if that’s the vector in this case, the S.F. seems to have taken its time getting there. :dubious:
[QUOTE=drpepper]
{snip} Sybil is fetched back [from her elopement], pledging love (with Anna in tow, I might add; see above). It’s sort of unclear where Branson goes…It seems like working class bloke Branson just waltzes in whenever a dramatic moment is needed, with no regard for the undoubtedly difficult travel logistics an unemployed man must face.
[/quote]
He and Sybil had fled in one of the cars belonging to Lord G. The next day, he drove the car back to the estate, then took a room at the Grantham Arms, where he would stay until Sybil was ready to leave Downton with him. The G.A. is where Branson and Lord G had the meeting during which Lord G offered money to Branson in exchange for leaving his daughter alone. Branson didn’t need to travel far once he was at the Grantham Arms, he could just walk to Downton, the churchyard, etc.
When Sybil decided to go back to Downton instead of continuing on to Gretna Green, Branson commented that she had chosen to go back to “them” (I’m paraphrasing). She replied that he shouldn’t think her love was so shallow/weak as to die after being away from him for a few hours (I’m wildly paraphrasing).
Nope, she’ll still be “Mrs Reginald Crawley”. She’s doesn’t seem like she’s the type to care.
I’m not sure where the dates are coming from, but the wiki lists Lady Mary as being born in 1892, Lady Edith in 1894, and Lady Sybil in 1898. Even if someone is pulling stuff out of thin air these dates still work. The only problem is Lady Sybil at her first season in 1914 when she was only 16. Didn’t girls have to be 18 to be presented at court?
[QUOTE=Toucanna]
…Carson, off-stage, clears his throat, and re-enters the breakfast room. Has he overheard Lord G?..
[/quote]
Now that I think about it, AIUI, the butler was the only member of staff who was not required to knock before entering a room (except bedrooms/dressing rooms/baths, of course). So I guess my interpretation will have to be yes, he overheard Lord G. :eek:
I agree that the season has a whole has been… not great. But it’s still kinda fun in a soap opera way. But in this episode, what kept driving me batty was people doing incredibly indiscreet things RIGHT OUT IN THE OPEN! Come on! If you’re going to kiss someone you shouldn’t kiss, in the middle of a huge house with zillions of people and servants running around all the time, at least have the common sense to go into a room and close a door!
Violet had what may be the best line in the series last night… but I can’t remember the exact wording. Somebody help out?
When Sybil announces her intention to run off with the chauffeur, Violet says oh-so-dryly WRT Richard Carlisle, “After Sybil and <something><something><something>, he’s practically a Hapsburg.”