I was relieved to see that it wasn’t real.
If you live in the United States, you could easily pay more than $20,000 per year for your child’s education. Engain in them a love of public universities.
You don’t understand how paying for the cost of raising a child is less than the cost of raising a child plus the cost of IVF? I’m not sure we can help if you don’t understand basic addition.
Except you have about 18 years to save up for it.
Are you taking into account daycare or someone’s lost income? Unless you have a free daycare arrangement, like a retired grandmother, or already aren’t working, daycare is easily going to be $1000/month for the first year. The costs of child rearing are more spread out, but they go on a lot longer. I think more people have to pay for daycare/forgo their own earnings than not. Add a couple hundred a month in extra insurance premiums, and it doesn’t take long before the cost of a kid is pretty close to an IVF cycle a year. The problem is that you can’t pace IVF cycles to one a year: you have to strike while the iron is hot. I do understand that.
However, I am saying this as someone who paid $14K for my own (failed) IVF and then another couple thousand for rounds of donor IUI before we had our son. Between my husband quitting work to care for him, the increase in our insurance, the $3K or so in medical bills, and then just stuff like formula and diapers, it wasn’t long before baby cost more than getting baby. Certainly less than a year.
I imagine they will have to be fed, housed, medically treated, and educated during those 18 years also.
Also spread over time, not a one time expense.
I get what you’re saying, but the two expenses are a bit different.
Could you go shit on the Duggars and the nineteen badly cared for child slaves they brought into the world or the morons who conceive children just because they happen to be drunk or high instead?
:rolleyes:
We get your fucking point already. You hate kids. You’ve written the same shit on this board a hundred times before. Go back to calling men who shake your hands rapists or trying to get people to give you money in turn for your stupid parlor tricks.
Good luck, Em. I wish you well. My children were conceived with the help of fertility treatments. They are a joy.
This is in line with the costs of my wife’s and I first IVF cycle in Oregon (successful pregnancy, but unsuccessful gestation). We have been trying for 7 years, and wish you the best of luck. I wish our costs more more in line with Canada, though my company does cover the first $10K.
Good luck, Em. I wish you well. My children were conceived with the help of fertility treatments. They are a joy.
[/QUOTE]
I agree with this. My children were conceived after a battle with infertility, and the help of fertility treatments. It was an emotional roller coaster, no doubt, but they are worth it.
Oh, and we weren’t wealthy people, either before or after we had children. But when raising a family is your priority, you find ways to make it work financially.
Best wishes to you and your husband, Em. I hope things go well for you.
You do have a point. My wife stayed home the first year or so to take care of the baby, so we didn’t have her salary.
There was just the one episode.
But yes, many people tuning in thought it was real. BNN, the broadcaster, is known for hoaxes, stunts and silliness, and the much-loved founder died after his body rejected his transplanted kidney. So there were definitely clues that it was a hoax.
The idea of the creators was: yes, let’s get people angry about this issue! Once everyone was riled up about the perceived immorality of the show, they redirected the anger at the fact that many people don’t bother to become donors. 50,000 people requested the forms to sign up as organ donors as a result of the show.
So maybe that can be something good coming out of this stunt: let’s all get angry about infertility. Someone might make a donation to fertility research, someone might donate their eggs, or just support someone going through infertility.
I’m also a little uncomfortable about the idea of voting on who gets a baby.
But do think its a more clever way of spending marketing dollars.
If you have say $10k to spend on “publicity”, this is a very good way to spend it. Rather than paying for ads or whatever, why not spend the money on getting someone pregnant and then hope that the word of mouth takes care of the publicity part?
This way, at least there’s an additional pregnancy for someone that may not have had otherwise right?
Well, most likely not, since one cycle of IVF doesn’t have a very high success rate.
It’s really just outsourcing their panel decisions. Trading expertise for participation.