"Dream Defenders" month-long sit-in in Florida State Capitol continues

You hit the nail on the head. The problem with this movement is that it is doomed to failure no matter how many people they register to vote. That is because they are trying to fix cultural problems with political solutions. It is relatively easy to get a bunch of people mad at a group of outsiders you decide to scapegoat. However, if every for profit prison went out of business tonight, tomorrow morning life would be no better for 99.999% of the community they claim to represent. However if the culture changed overnight so that education was important, criminality was shameful, people got married before having kids and stayed together after, life for the impoverished would get alot better very quickly and permanently for huge numbers of people.

They are trying to change laws. If the laws change, that is success all by itself. If that has the intended consequences, that is more success.

They are trying to improve the “black and brown” community, and in particular the younger generation of that community, per their mission statement. Changing laws is the method they have chosen to do so, but I also question how effective it will be in serving their goal. Certainly some changes would help: decriminalizing drugs, for instance, or school voucher programs (though I’d be surprised if the Dream Defenders support that).

Also, bit of good news for the movement: the Dream Defenders take issue with an “increasingly underfunded education system”. Starting in 2012, the state increased its education budget by $2 billion.

Also per pupil spending has gone up 38% in the last twelve years after you adjust for inflation. Education Week ranks Florida as the sixth best state in educational quality of its K-12 system.

Ah! Excellent. The Dream Defenders should probably drop the word “increasingly” from their statement.

I asked similar questions about Occupy Wall Street in its early days, and my own answer was that their lack of organization and focus would be fatal to any real chances of success.

They may possibly register that many voters – but I’d be quite surprised. And I predict that they won’t see the SYG law overturned, if that’s even really a goal.

What, specifically, are their other measurable goals?

Well, the DDs at least do not lack focus. As for organization . . . too soon to tell; we’ll have to wait and see.

Measurable. Not quantifiable, but if the legislature takes any of the desired action at all on any of these, that is a measure of success.

I take credit for Wisconsin’s Voter ID bill. I’m sure it’s due to my spirited defense of Voter ID here on the SDMB that the bill passed.

Don’t forget that they have Jesse Jackson and Harry Belafonte on their side. I guess Noam Chomsky was busy that weekend.

When’s the last time a protest in the United States even partially met their goals?

1994, and the Republican Revolution, comes to mind.

From the author:

It didn’t stop the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, but that was the last gun-control law to be passed by the Federal Government to date.

See Brooks Brothers Riot.

They ended their protest yesterday after 31 days. They gave it the old college try, but the Stand Your Ground Law is just too damned popular in Florida.

Any thoughts on the matter?

We’ll be hearing from them again, more than once, before November 2014.

Ok.

Any thoughts on their success – you know, the question you asked the reader to ponder?

Not immediately. They did get a pledge from the Speaker of the House to hold a special hearing on SYG this fall, and they’ll be there, but, it’s still a Pub-controlled legislature in both houses, not much will be done. The value of it is refocusing attention on their issues. I expect all this to have some effects direct and indirect on the political climate for the 2014 election, and none of it good for the Pubs.

That’s… vague, couched in blandly emotional terms, with no particular meaning. I don’t mean to insult, but all I’m getting here is that you want to “Raise Consciousness” and think these people did so. Is this correct? And are you honestly sure they didn’t harm their own supposed cause, either by looking like mouthy and invasive jerks or distracting from the actual issue they’re nominally focused upon?

Yes, I’m honestly sure they didn’t, etc.