# Driving right around left turners and those waiting behind them

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [September 17, 2022, 2:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725 "2022-09-17T14:42:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2022, 2:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/41 "2022-09-18T14:52:27Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> I grew up in the U.K., where such nonsense doesn’t exist.

Most colonists can’t figure out how traffic circles work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elfkin477](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a9a28c/32.png) [@elfkin477](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elfkin477)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2022, 6:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/42 "2022-09-18T18:10:04Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> I don’t know that I’ve ever seen an intersection with a dedicated right hand turn lane, and no dedicated left turn lane. Some pretty shoddy traffic engineers would have to come up with that.

They’re not unheard of in New Hampshire. The first one that comes to mind is on Silver St. in Dover, which was eventually redone to make the right lane right or straight. The people who designed the intersection apparently didn’t anticipate people turning left much, so there was a straight lane which got backed up all the time when people made left turns, and a right turn lane which wasn’t used very much, so people who’d be trapped behind the cars turning left would end up in the right lane if they meant to go straight for 300’ and turn right on Central Ave.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2022, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/43 "2022-09-18T19:28:45Z")

</div>

The most common setup for a two-lanes-each-way-at-the-intersection road, in my experience, is that the left lane goes left or straight, and the right lane goes right or straight. And it’s fairly common for someone in the left lane to get stuck behind people turning left, and cut into the right lane.

And even when one of the lanes is restricted, it’s not always obvious. There was probably a sign that the people now waiting at the light might not have noticed, that’s behind theme where they can’t see it. And some markings on the road, which are covered by cars and can’t be seen. Or is far enough ahead that it’s not easy to see.

So the people waiting may not even know that the right lane is restricted to turning right.

If I’m in the right lane, I’d be dumb not to watch out for people trying to cut into it. Even if that’s illegal, it’s like jaywalking, something an alert driver should watch for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mallard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@Mallard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mallard)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2022, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/44 "2022-09-19T23:21:52Z")

</div>

I wouldn’t use the RTO lane to drive straight ahead. Even if it is clear, that’s a good way to have an accident with a car making the left turn from the opposite direction as he “knows” you must turn right instead of driving straight ahead.

Or get a ticket.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WildaBeast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wildabeast/32/6_2.png) [@WildaBeast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WildaBeast)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2022, 12:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/45 "2022-09-20T00:28:52Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> One of the most annoying things is the person who pull up to the line at a 4-way stop clearly a full second before you, doesn’t go, and then when you peer at them to see what’s going on they wave you through like they are being helpful. No, you are just causing confusion.

A few years ago I was a passenger in my Dad’s car when he stopped at a four way stop and waited for the other guy to go, even though he pulled up to the intersection well before the other guy. I asked why he did that, and the following conversation ensued:  
Him: “Because he was on my right. He had the right of way.”  
Me: “But you got to the intersection before he did.”  
Him: “But only by a few seconds.”

And there’s the problem. You’re supposed to yield to traffic from the right if you arrive at the intersection at about the same time, except we don’t all agree on what constitutes “about the same time”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2022, 12:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/46 "2022-09-20T00:40:57Z")

</div>

I think the only sensible definition of “at the same time” is when you can’t easily tell who got there first. But who am I to say? This is why right of way that depends on order of arrival is so stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doreen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/858c86/32.png) [@doreen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doreen)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2022, 12:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/47 "2022-09-20T00:59:07Z")

</div>

It’s one of those things that’s stupid but there isn’t any less stupid way of doing it without getting rid of the all-way stop altogether. Because if it doesn’t depend on who got there first , you’ll have someone waiting for the person on their right who is still a block away from the intersection.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2022, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/48 "2022-09-20T01:44:46Z")

</div>

Of course, it’s intrinsic to the 4-way stop. They are stupid junctions, we should do away with them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2022, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/49 "2022-09-20T16:38:06Z")

</div>

Do we just change it to a 2 way stop with continuous traffic through? Downside of that is that the cross street may never be able to go anywhere at all.

Not all intersections can be turned into roundabouts, and traffic lights are expensive to install and maintain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2022, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/50 "2022-09-20T16:52:43Z")

</div>

> [@Oly](#):
>
> Say you drive up to a red light with a line of cars waiting. You want to drive straight through the intersection and you take your spot at the end of the line. The light turns green but the person at the front of the line wants to turn left and has to wait for an opening in the oncoming traffic (no left turn lane or light). The head car has pulled out into the intersection, but for whatever reason no one is going around them, so your lane is not moving. To your right is a right turn only lane with nobody in it. You check your mirrors and see no right tuners approaching. If you pull over into the RTO lane, you’d have a clear shot to get around the line of cars, head straight through and be on you way. Do you (a) continue to wait behind the line, or (b) avail yourself of the unused RTO lane to get around the line?

Option (a) is the only legal option and also the only safe option. Either wait and consider your poor route planning, or make a right turn.

In L.A., many intersections have “no left turn 7-9am, 5-7pm” or something similar to prevent this kind of congestion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2022, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/51 "2022-09-20T17:50:31Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> Do we just change it to a 2 way stop with continuous traffic through? Downside of that is that the cross street may never be able to go anywhere at all.

Junctions where right-of-way is dependent on order of arrival are rare outside North America. On quieter roads, you just give one road permanent priority. Where necessary, you put in a roundabout or lights.

The visual indications of right of way are also far superior on U.K. roads. A big triangle and thick white lines ON THE ROAD where they are automatically in your line of sight, not just signs at the side that are laterally displaced on a wider road and can get hidden in foliage. This is H.K., but it’s the same markings and signage:  
[https://www.td.gov.hk/en/road\_safety/road\_users\_code/index/chapter\_5\_for\_all\_drivers/stop\_and\_give\_way\_junctions\_/index.html](https://www.td.gov.hk/en/road_safety/road_users_code/index/chapter_5_for_all_drivers/stop_and_give_way_junctions_/index.html)

The other thing that exacerbates the stupidity of the U.S. system is use of the SAME SIGN for 2-way stops, when the majority of junctions are 4-way stops. The only way to discern that it’s a 2-way stop and that vehicles on the perpendicular road have permanent right of way is from the ABSENCE of the small supplementary “4-way” sign underneath the stop sign. It is just inconceivably stupid. I think virtually everyone has seen at least close calls where someone at a 2-way stop pulls out when a vehicle is coming. And that’s why you often see a big extra sign saying CROSS TRAFFIC DOESN’T STOP after numerous accidents. If you need supplementary signs to explain your signs, you need to change the primary signage, for fucks sake.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eonwe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eonwe/32/240_2.png) [@Eonwe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eonwe)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2022, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/52 "2022-09-20T21:18:12Z")

</div>

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> In any almost every intersection I’ve seen with a right turn lane, there is no way to carry on straight from the turn lane. That bit of the road ends (or in DC turns into street parking).

For most drivers, this absolutely _is_ a way to carry on straight. Draw a straight line from the center of the right turn lane to the center of the single lane on the other side of the intersection.

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> The most common setup for a two-lanes-each-way-at-the-intersection road, in my experience, is that the left lane goes left or straight, and the right lane goes right or straight. And it’s fairly common for someone in the left lane to get stuck behind people turning left, and cut into the right lane.

Same . . . which of course becomes untenable if the amount of traffic that wants to turn left reaches a critical mass, and/or oncoming traffic is constant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2022, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/53 "2022-09-21T06:31:08Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> Of course, it’s intrinsic to the 4-way stop. They are stupid junctions, we should do away with them.

One advantage of four way stops is that it slows traffic on all the streets. We have plenty near us, all medium size streets have them when they intersect, and they work fine. If some of the streets didn’t have them, the traffic wouldn’t be moving at 35 (10 mph over the limit) but more like 50.

As for roundabouts, when I drove around Boston the rule for rotaries, as I understood it, is that local tradition applied. Very helpful, but typical of Boston driving.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tired\_and\_Cranky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a87d85/32.png) [@Tired\_and\_Cranky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tired_and_Cranky)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2022, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/54 "2022-09-21T15:45:11Z")

</div>

> [@Oly](#):
>
> To your right is a right turn only lane with nobody in it. You check your mirrors and see no right tuners approaching. If you pull over into the RTO lane, you’d have a clear shot to get around the line of cars, head straight through and be on you way. Do you (a) continue to wait behind the line, or (b) avail yourself of the unused RTO lane to get around the line?

Continue to wait in line.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Seriously, folks, that car ahead of you is going to be there for maybe another ten seconds. If you can’t afford another ten seconds on your commute, that was a serious failure of planning on your part. And an accident would cost you a heck of a lot more than ten seconds.

Or another minute while the light cycles. Or three, if there are multiple cars ahead of you that will cause the same situation. Three extra minutes at every intersection I cross even going two miles to the grocery store would add a good twenty minutes to my trip. If I add 20 minutes on the way back, I no longer have time to go to the grocery store.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> “Whatever reason” likely being that the other drivers are all sane, reasonable, and law-abiding. You seem to be implying here that if everyone else is being safe, that gives you license to be unsafe.

This is overstating it. There is often plenty of room to go straight around left turning traffic that has already entered the intersection without breaking any laws or doing anything dangerous. It depends on the intersection and traffic, both of which are highly variable.

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> I don’t know that I’ve ever seen an intersection with a dedicated right hand turn lane, and no dedicated left turn lane. Some pretty shoddy traffic engineers would have to come up with that.

I definitely have. It makes perfect sense where there is lots of right turning traffic and not much straight or left traffic. It will also facilitate making a right turns on red, which can improve throughput.

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> Also, the right hand turn lane would _end_ at the intersection. If you took it, then you are not going to have anywhere to go once you get to the intersection.

Even if true, the easy answer is that the person using the right turn lane is simply going to move into the straight ahead lane. Intersections aren’t generally so tight that there is no physical room to make this maneuver after passing the left turning car. The OP’s hypothetical posits plenty of room for straight ahead traffic to go around the left turner. The guy in the right turning lane will just use that space.

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> I honestly can’t imagine a scenario where it would be a teen second wait.

If the lead driver is turning left and there is lots of oncoming traffic that won’t allow it. The lead driver will have to wait for the light to change and complete its turn from inside the intersection. I have heard this maneuver referred to as “claiming the intersection.” Turning after the light turns red is allowed if you entered the intersection before it turned red and cross traffic has to yield to the driver already in the intersection.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> I said that because, in real life, the vast majority of folks who do things like this don’t look to see if anyone’s coming. Including, I’m sure, the folks who insist that they do.

You might be right about this part. The people who do the somewhat dangerous behavior are also likely to do other dangerous behaviors, like not looking for other traffic when they change lanes.

> [@griffin1977](#):
>
> This is the key point. In the situation described in the OP you are the last in a long queue of cars behind the car waiting to turn. in that situation there is a good chance the car will have turned by the time you reach the intersection and now you are blocking the intersection (and the turn lane) waiting to get back in the left lane.

In some sort of idealized world where cars move frictionlessly you think this might happen. In the real world, the guy in the right lane will probably do it without incident. Perhaps, if the traffic in the left lane starts moving while he is passing on the right, he has the advantage of higher speed to put him ahead of all that traffic. Bad case, he will be passing some cars and will find a gap between the restarting cars going straight to slide into and will have only passed two or three cars before he proceeds straight. People pulling away from an intersection leave way more space between cars than you imagine. 3-5 car lengths is pretty typical in my experience. Worst case is he screws up the merge and causes an accident. This will happen rarely but often enough to make the maneuver not worth doing in the first place, hence my not doing it.

> [@chela](#):
>
> The bigger risk for the driver pulling around the stopped traffic to pass through the intersection is causing a head on crash with the oncoming traffic that is making its proper left hand turn.
> 
> That’s a dangerous intersection

You are very correct but it’s not the intersection that is dangerous, but rather the driver. In theory, at least, the left turning driver should be yielding to the turning traffic in the left lane but if the left turning driver, understandably, underestimates the oncoming driver’s speed (because he is accelerating to get through the intersection instead of slowing to make a turn) the left turning driver is more likely to try to get ahead of the jerk in the right turning lane. Worse yet, the left turning driver would almost certainly be deemed at fault for failing to yield.

> [@WildaBeast](#):
>
> And there’s the problem. You’re supposed to yield to traffic from the right if you arrive at the intersection at about the same time, except we don’t all agree on what constitutes “about the same time”.

I agree with this. If I’m there a fraction of a second ahead of the other person, I got there first and I’m going. That person probably hasn’t completed their stop before I’m on my way again. Your Dad would drive me insane because I would certainly be waiting for him to go, because right hand rule notwithstanding, we did not get there at the same time.

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> Of course, it’s intrinsic to the 4-way stop. They are stupid junctions, we should do away with them.

They seem stupid to me too generally, but they might be useful for things like reducing pedestrian collisions. I’m just not qualified to answer why there are so many. In general, many of them do seem entirely incomprehensible.

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> One advantage of four way stops is that it slows traffic on all the streets.

I’m not looking it up but I think the Uniform Manual on Traffic Controls discourages using stop signs to calm or slow traffic and it has other recommendations instead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2022, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/55 "2022-09-21T15:49:11Z")

</div>

> [@Tired\_and\_Cranky](#):
>
> they might be useful for things like reducing pedestrian collisions

There are much better (and safer) ways to calm traffic in suburban areas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Feldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lord_feldon/32/341_2.png) [@Lord\_Feldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Feldon)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2022, 7:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/56 "2022-09-22T07:00:24Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> The only way to discern that it’s a 2-way stop and that vehicles on the perpendicular road have permanent right of way is from the ABSENCE of the small supplementary “4-way” sign underneath the stop sign. It is just inconceivably stupid.

I think I’ve posted about this before, but I know of a 4-way intersection with a 3-way stop (the non-stopping direction is coming up a hill). Until recently ([street view from 2012](https://goo.gl/maps/LHE6EC6bRCDNsRL37)), there were only tiny little signs underneath saying “3-way”, and even if you happened to notice that this meant the opposite of _every_ other tiny little red sign, the only way to know _which_ direction didn’t stop was to find the other two stop signs, which were presenting their gray, non-reflective sides to you. It was functionally impossible to know how it worked using the normal cues given to drivers, you just had to know from experience that traffic coming up the hill was going to blast through. If it was your first time? RIP, I guess. (There are now big yellow explanatory signs, very similar to CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dead\_Cat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9fc29f/32.png) [@Dead\_Cat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dead_Cat)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2022, 8:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/57 "2022-09-22T08:16:16Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> I hate 4-way stops. They are even worse than hypocrisy. A junction where the right of way depends upon order of arrival is idiotic. (I grew up in the U.K., where such nonsense doesn’t exist.)

I agree with your general point, but it’s not unheard of for this to happen in the UK. The most common example would be 3 vehicles all arriving at a mini roundabout at the same time - usually resolved quickly by making eye contact with the other road users and then whoever is most assertive going first. It can also happen at a 2-way stop crossroads, if 2 vehicles arrive at the main (crossing) road from opposite directions and at least one wants to turn right on to the main road. When this happens to me, I yield to the vehicle that arrived before me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2022, 11:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/58 "2022-09-22T11:29:47Z")

</div>

> [@Dead\_Cat](#):
>
> it’s not unheard of for this to happen in the UK. The most common example would be 3 vehicles all arriving at a mini roundabout at the same time

This requires _three_ simultaneous arrivals at the smallest type of roundabout, obviously a much rarer event.

But the primary problem with the U.S. system is not the resolution of simultaneous arrivals _per se_, since this is an occasional feature of almost any traffic flow design. It is the fact that the order of arrival determines right of way - unless it doesn’t. It requires that everyone be mentally _processing_ the order of arrival to the detriment of monitoring safety (such as looking out for pedestrians) when approaching a junction; and that everyone have the exact same understanding of what _constitutes_ a simultaneous arrival, i.e. how small the time gap should be when order of arrival is abandoned and the tie-breaker of “person on the right has right of way” takes effect. It’s a mess when you have lines of vehicles arriving from 3 or more directions, all constantly pulling up to the stop lines and trying to evaluate whose turn it is, having to monitor cars arriving from multiple directions, with some people thinking that the order of arrival is still governing as new cars from the queues pull up to the stop lines, some maybe thinking that position rather than order of arrival should govern; all rendered even more chaotic by the inevitable idiots who imagine that they are being “generous” or “conservative” by not going when it is clearly their turn to go.

It does calm traffic in a perverse way, by creating a mess where everyone is confused. But if traffic calming is the objective, there are much better ways to achieve that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doreen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/858c86/32.png) [@doreen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doreen)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2022, 12:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/59 "2022-09-22T12:17:39Z")

</div>

That sounds like less of a problem with all-way stops in general and more of an issue that that particular intersection shouldn’t have one if there’s a line of cars waiting to pull up to the stop sign. The only time I see that are situations where it happens for a short time each day - for example, cars line up waiting to get to the stop sign _only_ at school drop-off and dismissal times.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2022, 1:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725/60 "2022-09-22T13:09:46Z")

</div>

No way. The best was to keep everyone safe is to be predictable. Going straight while in a turn lane is not just illegal lane use, it’s not expected.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/driving-right-around-left-turners-and-those-waiting-behind-them/971725.md?page=4)
