# Dropping in a little latin phrasing.

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689
**Category:** The BBQ Pit
**Created:** [April 23, 2012, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689 "2012-04-23T14:32:07Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![elbows](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b3f665/32.png) [@elbows](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elbows)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/1 "2012-04-23T14:32:07Z")

</div>

Please understand that this is directed at no one in particular, and I mean that in earnest, entirely. It’s not that I have anything against anyone. Nothing but respect. Sincerely.

When people slip latin phrasing, (without even ever bothering to provide any definition), casually into conversation, correspondence, it is extremely hard for me to see anything other than overt, condescending, douchebaggery. So much so, I find myself acutely embarrassed for them.

I’ll apologize right now, I’m sure it’s only me, and my personal short coming.

I don’t feel this way with my Chinese friends who toss in a Mandarin phrase, or Jewish friends who teach me a new Yiddish word. (Though they are mannered enough to make an explanatory aside, of course!) Jargon in excessive use, will drive me from a conversation, on occasion. Even Nerdy friend speaking Kingon doesn’t give me that same gut response.

There is something about the Latin, rubs me like people bragging about going to Harvard or Yale.

I am impressed with intelligence and learning, and great universities, having admiration for all these things. But if it’s all you talk about now I just see a douche.

Is it just me?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 2:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/2 "2012-04-23T14:34:49Z")

</div>

Latin per se doesn’t bother me, no. Latin per say, on the other hand, does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Frylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@Frylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frylock)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 2:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/3 "2012-04-23T14:43:57Z")

</div>

What’s the context? It may be they’re simply assuming the people they’re talking to would know the meaning, and they find it to be the best way to communicate the idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 2:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/4 "2012-04-23T14:58:08Z")

</div>

I’m glad you didn’t make this pitting an _ad hominem_. English is the _de facto_ world language now, and according to the _clamor_ of the _vox populi_, Latin is now _terra incognita_ for most people. _Vae victis!_ I hereby _veto_ the use of Latin words, phrases, _et cetera_, and I’d be ever so grateful if you’d speak and write using only small words that I already know.

(And no, my _alma mater_ is neither Harvard nor Yale; nor did I graduate _magna cum laude_).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/5 "2012-04-23T15:11:15Z")

</div>

I hate it when people commit that _faux pas_. It’s so _gauche_! In fact, it should be _verboten_.

_Ciao_!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/6 "2012-04-23T15:12:38Z")

</div>

> [@Frylock](#):
>
> What’s the context? It may be they’re simply assuming the people they’re talking to would know the meaning, and they find it to be the best way to communicate the idea.

Except that it almost never actually is the best way to communicate anything.

Look at the following, and tell me it’s not easier to understand:

I’m glad you didn’t make this pitting a personal attack. English is essentially the world language now, and according to what most people say, Latin is not understood by most people. I hereby reject the use of Latin words, phrases, and so on, and I’d be ever so grateful if you’d speak and write using only small words that I already know.

(And no, I graduated from neither Harvard nor Yale; nor did I graduate with honors or at the top of my class).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/7 "2012-04-23T15:19:33Z")

</div>

Yes, I’m aware that _ad hominem_ doesn’t actually mean personal attack, but the post I was rewriting used it that way.

And I’m also aware I left out a superfluous interjection. And that veto is actually an English word and could have been left in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ferret\_Herder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e47774/32.png) [@Ferret\_Herder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ferret_Herder)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/8 "2012-04-23T15:23:28Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> Except that it almost never actually is the best way to communicate anything.
> 
> Look at the following, and tell me it’s not easier to understand:
> 
> I’m glad you didn’t make this pitting a personal attack. English is essentially the world language now, and according to what most people say, Latin is not understood by most people. I hereby reject the use of Latin words, phrases, and so on, and I’d be ever so grateful if you’d speak and write using only small words that I already know.
> 
> (And no, I graduated from neither Harvard nor Yale; nor did I graduate with honors or at the top of my class).

That’s easier, but it’s debatable whether it’s “best” - “best” is defined by the setting. As just one example, using “ad hominem” in a logic class, in a debate, etc., is proper and often expected.

By the way - “essentially” and “hereby” should probably have been substituted, using the criteria that simple is better. Just because the latter is Middle English doesn’t mean “most people” understand it. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/9 "2012-04-23T15:26:25Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> Except that it almost never actually is the best way to communicate anything.
> 
> Look at the following, and tell me it’s not easier to understand:
> 
> I’m glad you didn’t make this pitting a personal attack. English is essentially the world language now, and according to what most people say, Latin is not understood by most people. I hereby reject the use of Latin words, phrases, and so on, and I’d be ever so grateful if you’d speak and write using only small words that I already know.
> 
> (And no, I graduated from neither Harvard nor Yale; nor did I graduate with honors or at the top of my class).

Apparently, the fact that “humor” is also a Latin word meant that my post was not understood.

ETA: And all of the expressions I used are “actually English,” in that they have been borrowed from Latin into English. Where do you draw the line at what to purge? “Except” and “communicate” are Latinate, as are “attack” and “essentially” and a good chunk of the rest of your post. “Vox populi” is reasonably well known in Britain, but (in my experience) rare in America.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Hogfather65](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/7bcc69/32.png) [@Hogfather65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hogfather65)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/10 "2012-04-23T15:31:02Z")

</div>

> [@elbows](#):
>
> Please understand that this is directed at no one in particular, and I mean that in earnest, entirely. It’s not that I have anything against anyone. Nothing but respect. Sincerely.
> 
> When people slip latin phrasing, (without even ever bothering to provide any definition), casually into conversation, correspondence, it is extremely hard for me to see anything other than overt, condescending, douchebaggery. So much so, I find myself acutely embarrassed for them.
> 
> I’ll apologize right now, I’m sure it’s only me, and my personal short coming.
> 
> I don’t feel this way with my Chinese friends who toss in a Mandarin phrase, or Jewish friends who teach me a new Yiddish word. (Though they are mannered enough to make an explanatory aside, of course!) Jargon in excessive use, will drive me from a conversation, on occasion. Even Nerdy friend speaking Kingon doesn’t give me that same gut response.
> 
> There is something about the Latin, rubs me like people bragging about going to Harvard or Yale.
> 
> I am impressed with intelligence and learning, and great universities, having admiration for all these things. But if it’s all you talk about now I just see a douche.
> 
> Is it just me?

Sometimes we all feel like that - so carpe diem

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Blaster\_Master](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/cab0a1/32.png) [@Blaster\_Master](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blaster_Master)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/11 "2012-04-23T15:37:48Z")

</div>

> [@Frylock](#):
>
> What’s the context? It may be they’re simply assuming the people they’re talking to would know the meaning, and they find it to be the best way to communicate the idea.

It’s really all about context. I try to use language that is appropriate to the audience. Sure, ad hominem is equivalent to a personal attack, but in the context of a debate, it’s a term that ought to be well known by anyone well versed in rhetoric and it specifically calls out the personal attack as a logical fallacy. That extra connotation is useful in the context of a debate but probably not useful in a random conversation with someone else. Similarly, in other cases it just makes more sense. For instance, alma mater, alumnus, all that sort of stuff is well known to any fluent English speaker and immediately has the context of relating to college, where saying the place I graduated from is less specific and longer to say.

I will say that people who excessively use latin phrasing do come across as arrogant or trying to appear smarter than they are, but in my view, it’s really no different than using excessive jargon or large words for no reason. That is, someone who uses works like utilize, facilitate, and all that are at least as bad. Speaking personally, I sometimes lose context because I’ll use latin terms in a context I’d expect people understand (as in a debate) that loses people or some internet related terms (eg, troll, fail/win, poke, epeen, and a number of others I can’t specifically recall right now) that even some computer savy people don’t understand without an explanation. At least for me, it’s not about showing off, it’s just not necessarily fulling understanding my audience’s context. So I can really only get behind pitting people who specifically do it to look smarter and ultimately become more difficult to understand rather than people who just make a simple mistake.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/12 "2012-04-23T15:39:18Z")

</div>

Sometimes people kvetch about the tiniest things.

There are places for Latin, especially in legal and debate-related conversations. Formal fallacy names are often Latin, for example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Kimmy\_Gibbler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Kimmy\_Gibbler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimmy_Gibbler)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/13 "2012-04-23T15:47:43Z")

</div>

> [@elbows](#):
>
> Please understand that this is directed at no one in particular, and I mean that in earnest, entirely. It’s not that I have anything against anyone. Nothing but respect. Sincerely.
> 
> When people slip latin phrasing, (without even ever bothering to provide any definition), casually into conversation, correspondence, it is extremely hard for me to see anything other than overt, condescending, douchebaggery. So much so, I find myself acutely embarrassed for them.
> 
> I’ll apologize right now, I’m sure it’s only me, and my personal short coming.
> 
> I don’t feel this way with my Chinese friends who toss in a Mandarin phrase, or Jewish friends who teach me a new Yiddish word. (Though they are mannered enough to make an explanatory aside, of course!) Jargon in excessive use, will drive me from a conversation, on occasion. Even Nerdy friend speaking Kingon doesn’t give me that same gut response.
> 
> There is something about the Latin, rubs me like people bragging about going to Harvard or Yale.
> 
> I am impressed with intelligence and learning, and great universities, having admiration for all these things. But if it’s all you talk about now I just see a douche.
> 
> Is it just me?

I guess you could say: _De gustibus non disputandum est._

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Alka\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c89c15/32.png) [@Alka\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alka_Seltzer)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/14 "2012-04-23T15:48:24Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> Except that it almost never actually is the best way to communicate anything.

Except that sometimes it is. There are a handful I’ll occasionally use, which either have subtly different meanings from their nearest English equivalent, are less verbose, provide emphasis, or simply scan better.

_ad hoc  
ad nauseum  
et cetera  
de facto  
post mortem  
ipso facto  
in extremis  
non sequiter  
per capita  
pro rata_

Useful little phrases.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/15 "2012-04-23T15:51:12Z")

</div>

> [@Alka\_Seltzer](#):
>
> Except that sometimes it is.

And sometimes you want to communicate that the other guy is an uneducated cretin!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Crotalus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crotalus/32/41_2.png) [@Crotalus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crotalus)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 4:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/16 "2012-04-23T16:00:51Z")

</div>

There are some foreign phrases, including some Latin ones, that include much more meaning than just their bare translations in their contexts. Consider a French one, “cherchez la femme”. It literally means “look for the woman”. In fact, to those who are familiar with it, it can mean that if there is a change in a man’s behavior, he probably has a new love interest, or that if there is a problem, a woman is probably behind it, or that women are the root causes of pretty much everything that happens. So if someone has a reasonable expectation that his readers will know or be willing to look up “cherchez la femme”, it can be a good phrase to use.

Particularly in the world we live in, where looking up a foreign phrase is nearly a seamless enterprise with reading, foreign phrases painlessly enrich writing. Its not like you have to go to the library to find a Latin dictionary.

And **Kimmy** , that’s just, like, your opinion, man. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/17 "2012-04-23T16:08:53Z")

</div>

> [@Crotalus](#):
>
> And **Kimmy** , that’s just, like, your opinion, man. 😃

You mean, [Chacun à son goût](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chacun%20%C3%A0%20son%20go%C3%BBt)?

I agree that obscure terminology – not just Latin phrases – can be just to show off a person’s special knowledge. However, these days almost anything can be explained by copying-and-pasting into Google.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 4:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/18 "2012-04-23T16:15:41Z")

</div>

> [@elbows](#):
>
> When people slip latin phrasing, (without even ever bothering to provide any definition), casually into conversation, correspondence, it is extremely hard for me to see anything other than overt, condescending, douchebaggery. So much so, I find myself acutely embarrassed for them. […]
> 
> I don’t feel this way with my Chinese friends who toss in a Mandarin phrase, or Jewish friends who teach me a new Yiddish word. (Though they are mannered enough to make an explanatory aside, of course!) Jargon in excessive use, will drive me from a conversation, on occasion. Even Nerdy friend speaking Kingon doesn’t give me that same gut response.
> 
> There is something about the Latin, rubs me like people bragging about going to Harvard or Yale. […]
> 
> Is it just me?

😕 Worse than that, it’s apparently just you **this year**. [Last year you seemed pretty much fine with it:](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=13934345&postcount=3)

> [@elbows on 6-19-2011](#):
>
> I’m looking to store, margarine, mayo, eggs, etc, by submerging them in the water.

Evidently the occasional use of a conventional Latin phrase like “et cetera” (abbreviated “etc”) **doesn’t** always bother you as much as you supposed.

So what’s the level of casual Latinity that **does** stir the needle on your annoyance meter? “Pro forma”? “Ipso facto”? “De mortuis”?

I think we can all agree that somebody offhandedly quoting whole passages of Vergil or Saint Augustine without any accompanying explanation is either a cluelessly isolated bookworm or a showoff trying to impress people with erudition. But you seem to experience that reaction even for routine use of common Latin loanwords and well-known conventional phrases, and that does seem a bit excessive to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Drunky\_Smurf](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/drunky_smurf/32/449_2.png) [@Drunky\_Smurf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drunky_Smurf)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/19 "2012-04-23T16:19:51Z")

</div>

> [@elbows](#):
>
> , condescending, douchebaggery.

Yep, douchebags.

> [@Kimmy\_Gibbler](#):
>
> I guess you could say: _De gustibus non disputandum est._

Yep, douchebag.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689/20 "2012-04-23T16:21:28Z")

</div>

What, do we need a minor government official to decide what borrowed words are acceptable, or something?

It’s satrap!

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dropping-in-a-little-latin-phrasing/619689.md?page=2)
