# E8 math problem solved: please explain in laymen's terms

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 19, 2007, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635 "2007-03-19T22:05:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sycorax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a4c791/32.png) [@Sycorax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sycorax)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2007, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/1 "2007-03-19T22:05:34Z")

</div>

I was just reading online about the E8, 248-dimensional math problem being solved. I read several of the links provided, but got no closer to understanding what the hell the 248 dimensional problem is, how it was solved, and why it was important to solve. Is there a way to explain it in laymen’s terms so that a math-challenged person (such as I) can understand it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AWB](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/bb73d2/32.png) [@AWB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AWB)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2007, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/2 "2007-03-19T23:12:03Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Sycorax]  
I was just reading online about the E8, 248-dimensional math problem being solved. I read several of the links provided, but got no closer to understanding what the hell the 248 dimensional problem is, how it was solved, and why it was important to solve. Is there a way to explain it in laymen’s terms so that a math-challenged person (such as I) can understand it?  
[/QUOTE]

Got any links, so we can take a gander at it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2007, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/3 "2007-03-19T23:17:38Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> If written out on paper, the calculation describing this structure, known as E8, would cover an area the size of Manhattan.

> **[Math research team maps E8](https://news.mit.edu/2007/e8)**
>
> Calculation on paper would cover Manhattan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sycorax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a4c791/32.png) [@Sycorax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sycorax)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2007, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/4 "2007-03-19T23:57:36Z")

</div>

Here’s the link:

[http://www.livescience.com/othernews/070319\_e8\_mapped.html](http://www.livescience.com/othernews/070319_e8_mapped.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/5 "2007-03-20T00:16:29Z")

</div>

This page and the ones it links to provide more detail: [http://aimath.org/E8/](http://aimath.org/E8/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultrafilter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/3d9bf3/32.png) [@ultrafilter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ultrafilter)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 3:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/6 "2007-03-20T03:08:54Z")

</div>

The comparison to the human genome project is good. What these guys have done, basically, is found the DNA for E[sub]8[/sub], which is the largest finite exceptional Lie group. Of course, that brings us to the question of what an exceptional Lie group is.

A course in modern algebra will begin with an introduction to the concept of a group, which is a structure that has some notion of multiplication of its elements. The multiplication has three properties:

1. For any group elements a, b and c, a\*(b_c) = (a_b)\*c.
2. There is an identity element; some e such that a_e = e_a = a for any group element a.
3. For any group element a, there is a group element b with a_b = b_a = e.

In very rough terms\*, a Lie group is a group where the multiplication is differentiable, just like all the functions you ran into back in calculus.

About 100 years ago, it was discovered that all but 5 finite Lie groups can be completely described by one of four categories and a positive integer. The other 5 are known as the exceptional Lie groups, and E[sub]8[/sub] is the biggest of them.

\*A Lie group also has to be a differentiable manifold, but we’ll all be happier if I don’t get into what that means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wendell\_Wagner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/8491ac/32.png) [@Wendell\_Wagner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wendell_Wagner)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 3:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/7 "2007-03-20T03:22:23Z")

</div>

How does this compare to the classification of all finite simple groups? It sounds similar, in that each problem is about characterizing all possible groups of a certain sort. In both cases, there were several sporadic or exceptional cases, and the complete classification of these things involved identifying all these sporadic or exceptional cases.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e36b37/32.png) [@Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Airman_Doors_USAF)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 4:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/8 "2007-03-20T04:14:42Z")

</div>

Serious question:

Is this just solving a math problem for its own sake, or does this stuff have any practical applications? I looked this up, and I’d like to say that it looks Greek to me, but even Greek is more comprehensible to me. So I’m genuinely interested in what difference this makes to anybody other than mathematicians.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/cc9497/32.png) [@Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt.Ridley_s_Shooting_Party)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 12:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/9 "2007-03-20T12:01:19Z")

</div>

From what I’ve read, theoretical physicists seem to be getting pretty excited about it. But I’m no expert.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mks57](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@mks57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mks57)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 1:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/10 "2007-03-20T13:36:24Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Airman Doors, USAF]  
Serious question:

Is this just solving a math problem for its own sake, or does this stuff have any practical applications? I looked this up, and I’d like to say that it looks Greek to me, but even Greek is more comprehensible to me. So I’m genuinely interested in what difference this makes to anybody other than mathematicians.  
[/QUOTE]

I don’t know about this problem in particular, but group theory has many practical applications, like cryptography and error-correcting codes. Modern digital communications and storage devices are heavily dependent on error-correcting codes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/11 "2007-03-20T17:28:48Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> The multiplication has three properties:

You forgot one. A group also has to be closed, which is to say that, if a and b are in the group, then a_b must also be in the group. For instance, the set [0.1,10] under standard real multiplication meets the other three requirements (associative, includes an identity, and includes inverses), but it’s not a group, since 10_10 = 100, and 100 is not a member of the group.

And I haven’t personally encountered this group in my work, but I’d be willing to bet that the theoretical physicists who are getting excited about it are all string theorists. Anyone else would shudder at the thought of working with a mathematical object that big.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultrafilter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/3d9bf3/32.png) [@ultrafilter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ultrafilter)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 5:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/12 "2007-03-20T17:36:21Z")

</div>

Closure is generally covered by defining the multiplication operator as an element of G X G -\> G, and I didn’t think it was absolutely essential to spell it out for the high-level introduction I was going for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![benny73](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/779978/32.png) [@benny73](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/benny73)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/13 "2007-03-20T17:50:43Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=ultrafilter]  
The comparison to the human genome project is good. What these guys have done, basically, is found the DNA for E[sub]8[/sub], which is the largest finite exceptional Lie group. Of course, that brings us to the question of what an exceptional Lie group is.

A course in modern algebra will begin with an introduction to the concept of a group, which is a structure that has some notion of multiplication of its elements. The multiplication has three properties:

1. For any group elements a, b and c, a\*(b_c) = (a_b)\*c.
2. There is an identity element; some e such that a_e = e_a = a for any group element a.
3. For any group element a, there is a group element b with a_b = b_a = e.

In very rough terms\*, a Lie group is a group where the multiplication is differentiable, just like all the functions you ran into back in calculus.

About 100 years ago, it was discovered that all but 5 finite Lie groups can be completely described by one of four categories and a positive integer. The other 5 are known as the exceptional Lie groups, and E[sub]8[/sub] is the biggest of them.

\*A Lie group also has to be a differentiable manifold, but we’ll all be happier if I don’t get into what that means.  
[/QUOTE]

Is there a pill that a guy can take to be brainy like you? It’s not fair. :smack:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sycorax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a4c791/32.png) [@Sycorax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sycorax)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 7:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/14 "2007-03-20T19:44:21Z")

</div>

Hmmm…so apparently there are no laymen’s terms, eh? 😉 Not sure I’m closer to understanding, but thanks for giving it a try.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scotandrsn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a4c791/32.png) [@scotandrsn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scotandrsn)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/15 "2007-03-20T19:59:59Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=ultrafilter]  
…a Lie group is a group where the multiplication is differentiable…  
[/QUOTE]

This phrase need expansion for complete clarity to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/16 "2007-03-20T21:08:56Z")

</div>

[The Daily Telegraph has an article on this](http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2007/03/19/ecpattern19.xml).

The article quotes mathematician Marcus de Sautoy, thusly:

> [@](#):
>
> What makes this group of symmetries so exciting is that Nature also seems to have embedded it at the heart of many bits of physics. One interpretation of why we have such a quirky list of fundamental particles is because they all result from different facets of the strange symmetries of E8. I find it rather extraordinary that of all the symmetries that mathematicians have discovered, it is this exotic exceptional object that Nature has used to build the fabric of the universe. The symmetries are so intricate and complex that today’s announcement of the complete mapping of E8 is a significant moment in our exploration of symmetry."

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mathochist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c89c15/32.png) [@Mathochist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mathochist)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 9:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/17 "2007-03-20T21:54:01Z")

</div>

I hate to admit it, but this really can’t be broken down to completely elementary terms. As a rough lead-in, start with what **ultrafilter** said about groups and then read [what I wrote today](http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/lie-groups-lie-algebras-and-representations/) as a preparatory. I cover a rough idea of what makes a Lie group, what leads from there to Lie algebras, and what a representation is.

I’m talking with Jeff Adams and our advisor (Jeff was his first student, I’m his most recent) and trying to get a rough sketch _I_ can understand of the K-L-V polynomials, which I’ll digest and report on on my above-linked weblog.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scotandrsn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a4c791/32.png) [@scotandrsn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scotandrsn)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2007, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/18 "2007-03-20T23:41:40Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mathochist]  
I hate to admit it, but this really can’t be broken down to completely elementary terms. As a rough lead-in, start with what **ultrafilter** said about groups and then read [what I wrote today](http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/lie-groups-lie-algebras-and-representations/) as a preparatory. I cover a rough idea of what makes a Lie group, what leads from there to Lie algebras, and what a representation is.

I’m talking with Jeff Adams and our advisor (Jeff was his first student, I’m his most recent) and trying to get a rough sketch _I_ can understand of the K-L-V polynomials, which I’ll digest and report on on my above-linked weblog.  
[/QUOTE]

Actually the page that **GFactor** linked to above were quite helpful in gaining a basic understanding.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mathochist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c89c15/32.png) [@Mathochist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mathochist)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2007, 7:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/19 "2007-03-21T07:55:37Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=scotandrsn]  
Actually the page that **GFactor** linked to above were quite helpful in gaining a basic understanding.  
[/QUOTE]

True, but there may be others reading the thread who are interested in a low-level but not superficial explanation. That’s what I’m giving over at my place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_C](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Captain\_C](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_C)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2007, 8:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635/20 "2007-03-21T08:05:51Z")

</div>

So… basically say you took a line. That’s 1 dimension. A square is 2 dimensions. A cube is 3 dimensions. A cube through time is 4 dimensions. This is basically an object of 248 dimensions?

Because if not, I have no idea what the heck you guys are talking about. My eyes glazed over about 2 sentences into **ultrafiler** ’s post

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/e8-math-problem-solved-please-explain-in-laymens-terms/396635.md?page=2)
