# Ebonics and television subtitles

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [June 27, 2019, 12:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149 "2019-06-27T12:33:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mean_mr.mustard/32/3865_2.png) [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mean_Mr.Mustard)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 12:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/1 "2019-06-27T12:33:06Z")

</div>

I was watching a reality-type TV show where a woman spoke Ebonics. Out of curiosity, I replayed portions of her speaking with closed captioning enabled to see how her speech would be interpreted.

Two questions came to me.

I assume subtitling/closed captioning is done automatically via voice-to-text technology? If this is correct, how did this woman’s pronunciation of the word “ask” (which she clearly pronounced “ax”) get transcribed correctly and repeatedly in the subtitle to “ask”?

Also, she used the phrase “I was fittin’ to eat lunch”. At least, that’s what my ears heard, and “fittin’” is how I’ve always interpreted that phrase. But the subtitle displayed it as “fiddin’”, which doesn’t make sense to me.

“Fittin’” I’ve assumed is a variation of “fitting” (not far from “fixin’”). But what could “fiddin’” relate to?

This one is particularly puzzling because I again came across a similar phrase, on a different show, and this one also displayed the word “fiddin’”.  
mmm

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 12:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/2 "2019-06-27T12:42:38Z")

</div>

I’ve imagined a scene in a comedy movie where a voice-activated device can’t interpret African-American accents and dialect correctly, causing one frustrated user to complain about the “muf\*\*\*ing honky computer!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![excavating\_for\_a\_mind](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e8c25b/32.png) [@excavating\_for\_a\_mind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/excavating_for_a_mind)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 1:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/3 "2019-06-27T13:07:43Z")

</div>

> [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](#):
>
> …
> 
> Two questions came to me.
> 
> I assume subtitling/closed captioning is done automatically via voice-to-text technology?  
> …

I doubt your first assumption is correct. My guess is that they have a human doing the transcription. As a minimum, they have a human monitoring the output and making corrections as needed. If this wasn’t the case, you would see a whole lot of errors (like you occasionally will see on live broadcast CC). For a reality show, my guess is they would take extra steps to make sure the transcription was accurate in order not to offend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VOW](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/vow/32/3043_2.png) [@VOW](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VOW)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/4 "2019-06-27T14:00:05Z")

</div>

I had a beautiful response written, then the effing page just blanked, and all was lost.

Captioning is much better than it used to be. Live TV can have problems. I have my favorite channels which are more reliable in captioning. I have also had situations where there is something I really WANT to see, and the captions are spotty, screwed up, or missing entirely. That’s when I turn off the TV and walk away.

Youtube captioning is dismal, and I don’t bother. At all.  
~VOW

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/5 "2019-06-27T14:00:43Z")

</div>

YouTube has some videos with automatically generated subtitles, but I think almost all the ones you see on broadcast TV are created manually.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZipperJJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zipperjj/32/211_2.png) [@ZipperJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZipperJJ)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/6 "2019-06-27T14:10:58Z")

</div>

Just FYI “ebonics” isn’t really the preferred term anymore. Typically this type of language you’re describing is known as AAVE, African-American Vernacular English.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/7 "2019-06-27T14:16:08Z")

</div>

> [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](#):
>
> I
> 
> Also, she used the phrase “I was fittin’ to eat lunch”. At least, that’s what my ears heard, and “fittin’” is how I’ve always interpreted that phrase. But the subtitle displayed it as “fiddin’”, which doesn’t make sense to me.

Variations on the same expression, ‘fixing to’, also written as finna, fidna, fixna and I’m sure many other ways. It’s dialect so there’s not really a ‘prescribed’ spelling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Turble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8dc957/32.png) [@Turble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Turble)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/8 "2019-06-27T14:39:28Z")

</div>

“Fidden to” is common vernacular for “gettin’ ready to”.

You might feel the pronunciation is similar to “tree fiddy” or “fiddy fi” (three fifty – fifty five).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mean_mr.mustard/32/3865_2.png) [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mean_Mr.Mustard)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 2:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/9 "2019-06-27T14:52:28Z")

</div>

> [@ZipperJJ](#):
>
> Just FYI “ebonics” isn’t really the preferred term anymore. Typically this type of language you’re describing is known as AAVE, African-American Vernacular English.

I think that depends on whom you ask.

I am aware of AAVE. I chose the term Ebonics (note the capital E) in my title based on this from the [Linguistic Society of America](https://www.linguisticsociety.org/content/what-ebonics-african-american-english):

> [@](#):
>
> However, the term Ebonics never caught on among linguists, much less among the general public. That all changed with the ‘Ebonics’ controversy of December 1996 when the Oakland (CA) School Board recognized it as the ‘primary’ language of its majority African American students and resolved to take it into account in teaching them standard or academic English.

mmm

ETA: Just FYI

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_McQwark](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/4da419/32.png) [@Steve\_McQwark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_McQwark)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/10 "2019-06-27T15:02:20Z")

</div>

> [@Lumpy](#):
>
> I’ve imagined a scene in a comedy movie where a voice-activated device can’t interpret African-American accents and dialect correctly, causing one frustrated user to complain about the “muf\*\*\*ing honky computer!”

Scottish on tv, not African-American in a movie, but here you go. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNuFcIRlwdc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNuFcIRlwdc)  
Two Scots frustrated by a voice-activated elevator.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/11 "2019-06-27T15:25:23Z")

</div>

[Interesting article](https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2018-05-16/how-do-tv-subtitles-work/) about how tv subtitles are created in the UK, but I imagine similar techniques are used worldwide, including _respeaking_:

> [@](#):
>
> It’s basically what you’re thinking: as the likes of newsreaders and presenters talk on TV, one of the designated 200 English-speaking subtitlers from across the globe will sit in front of a microphone repeating whatever’s said on air.
> 
> Doing this means a clear voice, free of any background noise, can be processed by specialised audio recognition software that generates captions on the screen. It’s a hybrid system – one that relies on a computer and subtitler.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Telemark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/telemark/32/372_2.png) [@Telemark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Telemark)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/12 "2019-06-27T15:27:39Z")

</div>

> [@Steve\_McQwark](#):
>
> Scottish on tv, not African-American in a movie, but here you go. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNuFcIRlwdc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNuFcIRlwdc)  
> Two Scots frustrated by a voice-activated elevator.

Darn, I wanted to post this when I read the first response but couldn’t at the time. You beat me to it. Grrr.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![excavating\_for\_a\_mind](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e8c25b/32.png) [@excavating\_for\_a\_mind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/excavating_for_a_mind)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2019, 6:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ebonics-and-television-subtitles/836149/13 "2019-06-27T18:15:08Z")

</div>

> [@Steve\_McQwark](#):
>
> Scottish on tv, not African-American in a movie, but here you go. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNuFcIRlwdc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNuFcIRlwdc)  
> Two Scots frustrated by a voice-activated elevator.

It’s true.  
Several years ago, the company I worked for had a “retreat” for middle-management types, complete with all-inclusive resort and paid-for activities. One of the activities was skeet-shooting (trying to shoot clay targets, or clay pigeons, out of the air with a shotgun). Well, the launcher for the targets was voice-activated (made in France, the range manager said, which may, or may not, be important). The range manager demonstrated by shouting “BIRD!” and ka-chung, a clay pigeon was launched across the shooting area. It would also respond to “PULL!”, as IME that is the more traditional signal for launching.

Well, there were about 8 of us in the group, with one Scotsman, the rest were Americans. This was in Texas, and while the Americans might not have all been native Texans, I suspect everyone in the group (other than the Scot) had lived there for at least a decade or more. Anyway, the voice-activated launcher worked flawlessly, until the Scot got up there. Having a natural Scot accent, he would pronounce “bird” more like “baird”, so perhaps that had something to do with it, but the thing just wouldn’t work for him. We had him try “PULL!” a few times (more like “pool” for him) but that wouldn’t work, either.

Maybe the elevator was of French manufacture as well.
