# Editing your own posts, revisited

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479
**Category:** About This Message Board
**Created:** [March 19, 2003, 5:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479 "2003-03-19T05:47:56Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Q.E.D](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/51bf81/32.png) [@Q.E.D](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Q.E.D)
#### Post date: [March 20, 2003, 2:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/21 "2003-03-20T14:35:25Z")

</div>

No, but it’s a perfect example of the sort of thing I’d have edited, if I could have. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C_K_Dexter_Haven)
#### Post date: [March 20, 2003, 5:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/22 "2003-03-20T17:42:10Z")

</div>

How much editing could an editor edit, if an editor could elect edited editing?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)
#### Post date: [March 20, 2003, 7:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/23 "2003-03-20T19:44:17Z")

</div>

Plus, think of all the perfectly good jokes which have come out of typos! Didn’t anyone read the Threadspotting a few days ago about the mod trading cards?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)
#### Post date: [March 20, 2003, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/24 "2003-03-20T23:03:17Z")

</div>

And the whole Og thing (and another that always tickles me, but shouldn’t be mentioned here)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![regurgit8](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/58f4c7/32.png) [@regurgit8](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/regurgit8)
#### Post date: [March 21, 2003, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/25 "2003-03-21T22:44:30Z")

</div>

So if someone makes a really bad typo, or a mistake that distorts the content and could cause the entire point of the post to be lost (it happens, I’ve been lurking here for a while, and I’m on several other message boards), the poster frequently follows up with one or more posts explainging and cringing in embarassment and so on and so forth (along the lines of “I better point out my own error before someone else beats me to it”). Don’t these unnecessary follow-up posts of explanation slow things down as much as an editing option would?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C_K_Dexter_Haven)
#### Post date: [March 22, 2003, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/26 "2003-03-22T01:42:07Z")

</div>

If someone makes a serious typo that distort the content (like “not” for “now”), the alternatives are to cringe and apologize, as you suggest, or to ask a Moderator to please fix it. We’re usually happy to do so.

But that’s just once in a while. People don’t bother to post an apology for an obvious typo (like “teh” instead of “the”)Minor typos, minor editing would be happening all the time if we allowed it. It’s a volume problem. There just aren’t anywhere near as many follow-up explanation posts as there would be edits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)
#### Post date: [March 22, 2003, 1:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/27 "2003-03-22T13:20:50Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> that you’re really worried or concerned about it (e.g., forgot the word “not”), email a Moderator and we’ll be glad to fix it for you

Why does it sound like ‘for a modest fee’ should be added to the end of that.

Anyway instead of editing what about the ability to append a post. Maybe like this:

_Appenended to post 3-22-2003 10:30_

Such appending will allow you to correct what you need or to add anything that your post left out in a way that is obvious to the readers. This will allow you continuity of thought for the reader.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Irishman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/b487fb/32.png) [@Irishman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Irishman)
#### Post date: [March 22, 2003, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/28 "2003-03-22T15:00:23Z")

</div>

If appending allows you to change what was already written, it is editing. Editing a post would automatically generate a line like that. Check any thread edited by a moderator. While that does announce that the post has been modified, it does not indicate _what_ was changed. Thus, a poster could rewrite their nasty or stupid argument, then claim they edited to fix a spelling mistake. Only the folks who read it before know differently, and only those who copied the previous post have a record of it.

If appending just allows you to put new material at the bottom of the post, and not change any text already there, then it is no different than a followup post, except is posts in the previous message. Not worth much, and may be more complicated. Plus, that would have to be a feature installed by vBulletin, not SDMB.

I have seen editing allowed on other boards. If unchecked, it leads to everyone posting the full content of the previous argument (rather than short excerpts) as protection against later revisions. That clutters up posts, and makes threads take up more memory.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C_K_Dexter_Haven)
#### Post date: [March 22, 2003, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/29 "2003-03-22T16:26:33Z")

</div>

I assume that appending is putting new material at the bottom, and the advantage (as cited by **kanicbird** ) is the logical flow. You could put your correction right next (that is, at the bottom of) your prior post. Currently, you might not notice for several posts, so there is a continuity problem.

Current:  
Poster A: Mr Rogers was a sniper in Vietnam.  
Poster B: I was in Vietnam and never saw Mr Rogers  
Poster C: I saw Mr Rogers on TV  
Poster A: D’oh! I meant “was NOT a sniper in Vietnam.”

Proposed:  
Poster A: Mr Rogers was a sniper in Vietnam  
_Appended 3/21/03 at 7:22 AM: D’oh, I meant “was NOT a sniper in Vietnam”_  
Poster B: Poster B: I was in Vietnam and never saw Mr Rogers  
Poster C: I saw Mr Rogers on TV

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)
#### Post date: [March 23, 2003, 2:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479/30 "2003-03-23T02:44:57Z")

</div>

That is exactly how I ment to propose it **C K Dexter Haven** now if I can olny find that append button ;).

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/editing-your-own-posts-revisited/162479.md?page=1)
