Comprise means “to contain.” The word is used at the beginning of the sentence. Example: The house comprises ten rooms and three baths.
Compose means “to combine, to put something in order or to make up.” The word is used at the end of the sentence. Example: Ten rooms and three baths composes the house.
Courtesy of my professor in music school, Manus Sasonkin (RIP), who used to improvise 4-bar (sorry, measure) examples on the board for music theory class:
Ultimate: the last bar Penultimate: the second-to-last bar Anti-penultimate: the third-to-last bar Anti-anti-penultimate: the first bar
Oxymoron: the deliberate apposition of contrasting words, e.g. “Parting is such sweet sorrow”. An oxymoron is a special kind of contradiction in terms, but it most definitely does not mean “contradiction in terms”.
Or at least it didn’t until about 15 year ago when a mob of grammatical thugs trampled, besmirched, degraded and pretty well destroyed an elegant word.
Eh, I don’t think all the battles are lost. On the other hand, it’s almost never actually useful to have a word meaning “one tenth of it was destroyed”, so I think we’re better off with the current usage of decimate.
It’s not the location, it’s the recency. Rules for what is proper just don’t spring up that quickly. If a distinction was common in 2006, it was likely common for years before that. One would expect there to be other observations of such use.
A pattern first discovered in 2006 is unlikely to be well-formed enough by now to form an actual rule, where not following it would be something that not even a large minority of learned speakers would view as a mistake.
Now, maybe if it were a neologism, it might make sense that there would be new rules. But that’s because new uses of language grow faster than older ones go away. “Use” and “utilize” are old words.
The only way the distinction between use/utilize can make sense is if you can find people making such a distinction rather earlier than 2006 and probably earlier than the Internet.
I hope that all made sense. I find it hard to articulate, as it seems so obvious to me. It’s just how descriptivism and prescriptivism interact. Something must be described before it can be prescribed.
cue: A signal to do something or a stick that forces a white ball to hit other balls.
queue: a line or other ordered waiting group
I didn’t know the difference between these two words for a lot longer that I like to admit. I think it may have been since I joined this message board. :eek:
Can anyone explain to me how the word sanction seems to have two meanings that are almost exact opposites?
There’s sanction, verb, in the sense of give official approval to something. (“This heavyweight bout is sanctioned by the Nevada State Athletic Commission…”)
Then there’s sanction, noun, in the sense of official condemnation or punishment for something. (“The United States is considering further sanctions against Russia…”)