# "Egypt seems to lack even the basic mental ingredients" for democracy" Yes or no?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [July 5, 2013, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735 "2013-07-05T17:51:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9dc877/32.png) [@astro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astro)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2013, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735/1 "2013-07-05T17:51:38Z")

</div>

[Re this article about this statement by pundit David Brooks](http://gawker.com/david-brooks-is-mentally-unprepared-for-egyptian-democr-678039879). Is Brooks being culturally obtuse or does he have a point that some countries are simply not socially and culturally ready for a democratic form of government?

> [@](#):
>
> New York Times columnist David Brooks is “defending the coup” today. Why? Because “Egypt… seems to lack even the basic mental ingredients” for democracy.
> 
> It’s not just that, as Brooks writes, members of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists “lack the mental equipment to govern”—“Once in office, they are always going to centralize power and undermine the democracy that elevated them,” which, heh, sounds like a good line from a column about the modern American presidency!—it’s that all all of Egypt does:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2013, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735/2 "2013-07-05T17:53:07Z")

</div>

Enlightened Despotism has gotten a bum rap.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2013, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735/3 "2013-07-05T18:30:32Z")

</div>

I don’t think it’s a matter of not being “ready” but rather there’s no sense to stay with it when things are bad. A [column by Jeb Golinkin](http://theweek.com/article/index/246477/the-dangerous-precedent-of-mohamed-morsis-ouster) is subheaded: “For any country to establish an enduring system of democratic governance, its citizens must develop an allegiance to their particular system of choosing leaders”.

The issue there is that, until you have a string of competent and admirable leaders selected via democracy, you don’t have a whole lot of reason to stick with it or say “Well, we agreed to give him four years so…”. Egypt has had one guy and he’s seemingly driven Egypt into the ground and made major domestic and foreign policy blunders so what’s the incentive to wait three more years? To avoid people across an ocean from clucking their tongues and shaking their heads?

That said, I don’t think Egypt innately “lacks” anything. They just made a bad pick going out of the gate. Hopefully the next time around will give them a government (both executive and parliament) that they trust or at least acts as a hedge against itself rather than being dominated by one faction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2013, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735/4 "2013-07-05T18:55:16Z")

</div>

That’s why we’ve got to bear the White Man’s Burden. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![friedo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8edcca/32.png) [@friedo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/friedo)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2013, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735/5 "2013-07-05T19:00:53Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> That’s why we’ve got to bear the White Man’s Burden. :rolleyes:

Prime Directive is better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2013, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735/6 "2013-07-05T20:29:29Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> I don’t think it’s a matter of not being “ready” but rather there’s no sense to stay with it when things are bad. A [column by Jeb Golinkin](http://theweek.com/article/index/246477/the-dangerous-precedent-of-mohamed-morsis-ouster) is subheaded: “For any country to establish an enduring system of democratic governance, its citizens must develop an allegiance to their particular system of choosing leaders”.
> 
> The issue there is that, until you have a string of competent and admirable leaders selected via democracy, you don’t have a whole lot of reason to stick with it or say “Well, we agreed to give him four years so…”. Egypt has had one guy and he’s seemingly driven Egypt into the ground and made major domestic and foreign policy blunders so what’s the incentive to wait three more years?

The idea is to set up a society that has rule of law, not one where the military ousts whoever they don’t like.

I have no brief for Morsi, but doesn’t Egypt have a system of impeachment, or a vote of No Confidence or something? That’s how you get somebody out of office if you decide you don’t want them there anymore. You don’t oust them via a military coup.

As to the question in the OP’s title, no, there is nothing inherently wrong with Egyptian intelligence or self-control. They just do not have scarily enlightened people like Geo. Washington and Jefferson and Adams. Yeah yeah yeah - they were slave holders, that’s not the point. They knew that you do not establish a democracy by making exceptions at the beginning. And so Washington turned down the chance to be President-for-life.

**And** they had a commitment to secular government, which Islam does not. If you want to point to something the Egyptians don’t have that the Founding Fathers did, that would be a suggestion. It can be overcome - Turkey has a reasonably secular government in an Islamic society, but it is something that has to be overcome. And legally - not by having the military put your President under house arrest if he cozies up to the Muslim Brotherhood and breaks his campaign promises of inclusion.

OTOH, it’s the Middle East. Somebody is going to fuck it up no matter what you do.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![even\_sven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/dfb087/32.png) [@even\_sven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/even_sven)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2013, 9:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/egypt-seems-to-lack-even-the-basic-mental-ingredients-for-democracy-yes-or-no/662735/7 "2013-07-05T21:06:56Z")

</div>

Democracy is not magic. It won’t make all of the divisions in a society go away.

But neither will anything else. There is no other good option.
