Ich denke an trump und Ich schieße es ab.
(google translate. no speckenze german)
The DEA has already surrendered that authority to the DoD in the Caribbean. Eventually the Pentagon will be in charge of everything from the post office to sending out social security checks.
Just like the felon’s loverboy’s country.
I keep hearing about how balloon releases are bad for the environment.‘it’s good to see the government doing something about it.
I believe you are a conservative poster so I don’t really know how you intended your post. I suggest that if you are intending sarcasm, make it blatant when you are outside the pit. If it isn’t sarcasm, please explain how the Trump admin is doing something about it. From my perspective, the Trump admin did a lot of disruptive bad shit for no reason. Ergo, executive branch = dumbshits.
I say it’s a good thing for the environment that they are using lasers to shoot down party balloons and you can’t tell if I’m being sarcastic? I don’t think that’s a me problem. And no I’m not particularly conservative and I’m certainly not a Trump supporter.
If people can’t understand what you are saying, it’s a them problem?
I disagree. It’s a you problem. Clearly state what you are saying. It cannot be that hard.
In this case, yes.
I know! But I want “them” to explain it.
You is tbe them, so start 'splanin
Dude, EVERYONE ELSE here knew what Loach meant.
Representing the contingent of “everyone else,” I concur. I was clearly and obviously sarcasm. We don’t need “/s” tags everywhere.
The original German lyrics for that part were:
Denk’ an dich und lass’ ihn fliegen
“I think of you and let them fly”, so:
Denk’ an Trump und lass’ ihn fliegen
+1
Agree.
This is a natural progression from the recent drone panics in New Jersey and in Copenhagen, as well as older panics in Colorado and at London Gatwick. Judging from the video clips that have appeared on the internet associated with these panics, maybe 75% of these apparent ‘drones’ were distant aircraft misidentified by the observers, aircraft that were more than ten times further away than the observers thought they were.
A number of observers in Copenhagen and Europe have attempted to shoot these ‘drones’ down, with no result, because they were using rifles and other kinds of ballistic weapon. If you fire a gun at a target that is ten times further away than you think it is, you will miss because the bullet follows a ballistic curve.
However, a laser beam follows a straight line geodesic, so you will hit it, whether it is a hundred yards away or ten miles away. I expect the FAA are not keen on drone defence systems that can shoot down balloons (or drones) being targeted in error at civilian aircraft.
“I think of trump and shoot it down.”
And it’s not even a matter of them targeting the civilian aircraft. Even if they hit it, the “drone” won’t stop all of the laser energy, and so it keeps going. Imagine flying a plane through an airspace with a laser beam you can’t even seen beaming across your flightpath.
Even lasers with no kinetic energy are the bane of civilian aviation. Maybe more so than drones.
Moderating:
This is attacking the poster outside the pit. If a post confuses you, just ask. Don’t make snide assertions like:
Also, I’m glad to see the thread has moved past this hijack, but please, everyone, don’t bring it up again.