# Election Day \[Week\]\[Month\[s\]\] \[Year\] 2020 follow-along thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [November 3, 2020, 5:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618 "2020-11-03T05:36:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 370

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 5:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7395 "2020-12-05T05:58:20Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Devil’s Advocate: Assume there really was massive voter fraud and you only have a month (or less) to sort it out before stopping the damage becomes impossible when the Electoral College votes the other guy in? The court system is notoriously slow. Even expedited cases wouldn’t be fast enough for this.
> 
> But do we want a precedent where the highest court just skips all the earlier steps? That didn’t even happen in Bush v. Gore.

I don’t see why it couldn’t be, and you mentioned why: Bush v. Gore. If the courts need to move faster, they can move faster.

I do wonder what would happen if there actually wasn’t enough time, though. I do note one thing: Congress sets the date for the Electoral College to cast their votes, and could pass a law to change it. The date is not in the Constitution, just the fact that it is under Congress’s purview.

Thus fixing this problem of what to do if voter fraud is found is something Congress could pass a law to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 6:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7396 "2020-12-05T06:03:08Z")

</div>

Great point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Northern\_Piper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/northern_piper/32/5304_2.png) [@Northern\_Piper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Northern_Piper)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 6:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7397 "2020-12-05T06:20:34Z")

</div>

> [@solost](#):
>
> He actually then came back with "what if all those lawsuits are a smokescreen and the legal team is secretly planning something really big?

Tell him one of your internet lawyer buddies says that when you’re planning something big, winning cases is always better than losing them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 6:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7398 "2020-12-05T06:33:09Z")

</div>

> **[Biden officially secures enough electors to become president](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-officially-secures-enough-electors-become-president-n1250085)**
>
> Although members of Congress can object to accepting the electors' votes, it would be almost impossible for Biden to be blocked at that point.

# Biden officially secures enough electors to become president

Although members of Congress can object to accepting the electors’ votes, it would be almost impossible for Biden to be blocked at that point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_S](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/46a35a/32.png) [@Max\_S](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_S)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 6:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7399 "2020-12-05T06:45:25Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Devil’s Advocate: Assume there really was massive voter fraud and you only have a month (or less) to sort it out before stopping the damage becomes impossible when the Electoral College votes the other guy in? The court system is notoriously slow. Even expedited cases wouldn’t be fast enough for this.

Look at the Pentagon Papers case, _New York Times Co. v. United States_, 403 U.S. 713 (1971):

- Sunday, June 13, 1971: _The New York Times_ publishes their first “Vietnam Archive” article including classified information from the Pentagon Papers
- Monday, June 14, 1971: _The New York Times_ publishes their second article. Attorney General John Mitchell sends a cease and desist (by Telex). _The Times_ indicate they will not comply and hold a press release.
- Tuesday, June 15, 1971: [District Judge Gurfein issues temporary restraining order](https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/97/04/13/reviews/papers-injunction.html) thru Saturday, (Times waives their right for an immediate appeal)
- Friday, June 18, 1971: hearing before the District Court
- Saturday, June 19, 1971: Judge Gurfein rules in favor of the _The Times_, on the merits, injunction lifted
- Tuesday, June 22, 1971: _en banc_ hearing before the 2nd Circuit
- Wednesday, June 23, 1971: [2nd Circuit issues injunction](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/444/544/340930/) and remands to District Court for rehearing before July 3
- Friday, June 25, 1971: Supreme Court grants certiorati, holds arguments same day
- Saturday, June 26, 1971: [Supreme Court rules in favor of _The Times_](http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep403/usrep403713/usrep403713.pdf)
- Sunday, June 27, 1971: _The New York Times_ publishes the next article

Elapsed time: eleven days from injunction.

~Max

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 6:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7400 "2020-12-05T06:47:40Z")

</div>

So why didn’t the Trump team do that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_S](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/46a35a/32.png) [@Max\_S](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_S)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 6:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7401 "2020-12-05T06:55:44Z")

</div>

The Trump team didn’t _need_ a ruling by the next morning.

ETA: The newspaper prints every morning. Every day spent waiting means the right to freedom of the press is (potentially) being infringed. Can’t wait.

But look at the case about observation distance. They got that one very quickly, because it couldn’t wait. Every day without a ruling, rights were (potentially) being infringed.

~Max

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoons](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spoons/32/3141_2.png) [@Spoons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoons)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 7:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7402 "2020-12-05T07:13:57Z")

</div>

> [@Northern\_Piper](#):
>
> Tell him one of your internet lawyer buddies says that when you’re planning something big, winning cases is always better than losing them.

If the Trumpists I’ve read on another forum are anything to go by, the “something big” is getting the matter into the Supreme Court, with witnesses and evidence and a jury and a trial presided over by a panel favourable to Mr. Trump. He can’t lose!

Problem is, that nobody explained to them that the Supreme Court of the United States is not a trial court; it is an appellate court. It does not have to accept the case at all, especially if it supports lower courts’ rulings. The evidence and witnesses have been presented at lower courts; and they are accepted as fact. Thus, there are not witnesses or other evidence presented, and there is no jury to try the facts. All there are, are legal arguments based on the facts found in lower courts.

But according to the Trumpists at that forum, this is the “something big.” If they lose at lower courts, that’s fine; they’ll just appeal up to the Supreme Court, where the real trial can take place. 🤣

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_S](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/46a35a/32.png) [@Max\_S](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_S)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 7:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7403 "2020-12-05T07:20:14Z")

</div>

> [@Spoons](#):
>
> Problem is, that nobody explained to them that the Supreme Court of the United States is not a trial court; it is an appellate court.

SCOTUS has original jurisdiction, too. The United States could bring suit against a state directly in the high court if AG Barr so wished, see 28 U.S.C. 1251. You wouldn’t have a jury though.

~Max

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7404 "2020-12-05T15:38:27Z")

</div>

Dear God, these people should be ashamed.

> **[Just 27 congressional Republicans acknowledge Biden’s win, Washington Post...](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/survey-who-won-election-republicans-congress/2020/12/04/1a1011f6-3650-11eb-8d38-6aea1adb3839_story.html)**
>
> Of the 249 Republicans in the House and Senate, 220 will not say who won the election, largely hiding from answering questions about Trump’s loss.

Here it is in a chart.

[![](https://i.imgur.com/GuzTxKO.jpg) ](https://i.imgur.com/GuzTxKO.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowthx](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowthx/32/10660_2.png) [@snowthx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snowthx)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 3:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7405 "2020-12-05T15:47:27Z")

</div>

The Republican party has ceased to be a political entity - they are now clearly a cult with anti-democratic political power, with their own set of data and information not aligned with reality. They are spineless cowards fearful of the wrath of Dear Leader and of threats of violence from his followers. Sad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7406 "2020-12-05T16:14:59Z")

</div>

I think what they are really afraid of is Mitch. If they want to have any power at all, they have to toe his line. Or else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7407 "2020-12-05T16:19:25Z")

</div>

> [@silenus](#):
>
> I think what they are really afraid of is Mitch. If they want to have any power at all, they have to toe his line. Or else.-

It’s only 'cause Mitch carries these on his belt.  
[![](https://medical-tools.com/shop/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/image/700x560/bcf7ce64d63d93f1f374273bba74938d/s/h/sheep-calves-castration-ring-applicator-steel-elastrator4.jpg) ](https://medical-tools.com/shop/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/image/700x560/bcf7ce64d63d93f1f374273bba74938d/s/h/sheep-calves-castration-ring-applicator-steel-elastrator4.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7408 "2020-12-05T17:20:19Z")

</div>

> [@Max\_S](#):
>
> The Trump team didn’t _need_ a ruling by the next morning.

In Wisconsin, why didn’t they do that?

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling was basically that the Trump team was jumping the line and needed to go back to the start. The Trump team basically had said they were trying to jump the line because there was no time to do it from the start.

Is that short assessment wrong?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7409 "2020-12-05T17:34:44Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> In Wisconsin, why didn’t they do that?
> 
> The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling was basically that the Trump team was jumping the line and needed to go back to the start. The Trump team basically had said they were trying to jump the line because there was no time to do it from the start.
> 
> Is that short assessment wrong?

In Wisconsin, the Trump campaign apparently only started filing these lawsuits in the past week, after waiting to decide on asking for a recount (but only in two counties which weren’t going to swing his way anyway), and then waiting for the results.

And, as far as I can tell, there’s nothing in those lawsuits which were dependent on seeing the results of the recounts – they’re about how the state ran their election, and there’s no reason why they could not have filed those weeks ago.

I strongly suspect that they waited until now because this is all political theater, and they know that they won’t win any of these – it’s about keeping the outrage going among Trump supporters, and getting them to continue to donate money towards “the cause.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 5:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7410 "2020-12-05T17:40:02Z")

</div>

When jellyfish need to come up with an example of something spineless, they use Republicans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Stainless\_Steel\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_stainless_steel_rat/32/5727_2.png) [@The\_Stainless\_Steel\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Stainless_Steel_Rat)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7411 "2020-12-05T17:46:08Z")

</div>

I want to know who the two individuals (I presume they are the same person) who voted for Trump on questions 1 and 3 are. They are delusional (and potential 2024 candidates for the Republican nomination IMHO…).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7412 "2020-12-05T17:50:53Z")

</div>

Clearly most Republicans are invertebrates. A small # are insane.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Lendervedder](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/happy_lendervedder/32/8488_2.png) [@Happy\_Lendervedder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Lendervedder)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7413 "2020-12-05T17:52:46Z")

</div>

There’s a pretty good chance that most of the Republicans just didn’t bother answering. That’s how it looks to me anyway. It’s not that only 25 acknowledge Biden as the winner, it’s that most of them just didn’t give a shit enough about the survey to be arsed to answer.

As much as I hate Republicans right now, I believe most of them acknowledge Biden as the winner, even if they don’t bother answering that question in a survey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jas09](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d07c76/32.png) [@Jas09](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jas09)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2020, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618/7414 "2020-12-05T17:55:34Z")

</div>

> [@Happy\_Lendervedder](#):
>
> There’s a pretty good chance that most of the Republicans just didn’t bother answering.

Exactly right. Because, honestly, why would they? Many (most?) of them (and their supporters) see the Washington Post as biased at best and “the enemy” at worst. They have less than zero incentive to answer a “quiz” from a reporter at the Post.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618.md?page=369)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/election-day-week-month-s-year-2020-follow-along-thread/924618.md?page=371)
