Look up Claude Shannon writing about how to play chess with a computer and the various papers by Alan Turing. The Turing test was proposed a lot more than 50 years ago.
Your knowledge of the history of computing is sorely lacking.
OK, my first tip to you is that * anything * written about AI in a popular magazine is either rubbish or has been simplified to the point where it’s not worth reading. That said, that article is not bad for something aimed at a mass-media audience.
And second, what’s your point? Correlation between electromagnetic energy and AI – well, unless you’re using some steampunk implementation of Babbage’s Analytical Engine, then yeah, I’d expect the correlation to be about 100%.
Those who can, do. Those who can’t give online classes about it. 
There you have it - AI!
OK, it was a spammer. But it has to mean something, right?
Only a computer could respond to a spammer so quickly.
Hmmmmm.
It is not logical at all. It is a supposition, with a remote possibility, but not “logical to assume” in any way. Occam yourself out.
Somehow the success of Watson makes me think we are a little closer.
Yeah, even before Turing proposed his test, there was the book Giant brains; or, Machines that think (mostly about ENIAC, which was ‘programmed’ by physically rearranging its cabling).
[quote=“Gary “Wombat” Robson, post:8, topic:593167”]
If you have something to say, Vahid, say it. If not, I’ll just close this down.
[/QUOTE]
We do, too. If you aren’t interested in pursuing your own thread, I’m not leaving it open.