# Elephants' trunks--deducible from skeleton?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [August 31, 2012, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311 "2012-08-31T21:39:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@Frylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frylock)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2012, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/1 "2012-08-31T21:39:31Z")

</div>

If all we knew about elephants (and mammoths etc) was their skeletal structure, would we have known they had trunks?

Big floppy ears?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2012, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/2 "2012-08-31T21:44:50Z")

</div>

I don’t think so, at least, not the full length of it. An elephant skull clearly has a big space and attachment area for the trunk, but I don’t think we’d be able to tell it was longer than a prehensile snout.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2012, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/3 "2012-08-31T22:05:32Z")

</div>

Note that Asian elephants don’t have the kind of big floppy ears that African Elephants have. Always look in those old Tarzan movies and the like to makes sure they don’t have smaller-eared Asian elephants roaming around Africa!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2012, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/4 "2012-08-31T22:08:41Z")

</div>

We could tell they had trunks of sorts by the position and size of the nasal opening and the marks of attachments for muscles (but as **Mangetout** says, wouldn’t be able to tell how long it was).

A number of extinct animals have been reconstructed as having at least short trunks on this basis, including _[Pyrotherium](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrotherium), [Astrapotherium,](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrapotherium)_ and [_Macrauchenia._](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macrauchenia)

It has been proposed that because of the placement of the nostrils some sauropod dinosaurs had trunks but today this is [generally discounted.](http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/03/20/junk-in-the-trunk/)

I don’t think the size of the external ear can be determined from fossils.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Man\_In\_Black](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bcef8e/32.png) [@The\_Man\_In\_Black](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Man_In_Black)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2012, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/5 "2012-08-31T22:38:22Z")

</div>

I remember hearing that some think that in ancient times, people would find elephant skulls and think the nasal cavity was a giant eye socket.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/6 "2012-09-01T00:05:02Z")

</div>

There was a display at the Phoenix Zoo, with an elephant skull, and an informational placard talking about the mythical Cyclops.

In a slightly related matter, apparently you can tell from a Moose’s skull that it has attachments for very agile lips, which the Moose uses to eat river grasses and sedges and things. Some dinosaurs – the big, long-necked four-legged vegetarian bruisers – have similar indications on their skulls…and so may have had agile lips.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 12:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/7 "2012-09-01T00:25:08Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Man\_In\_Black](#):
>
> I remember hearing that some think that in ancient times, people would find elephant skulls and think the nasal cavity was a giant eye socket.

The article is no longer on CNN, but [Here](http://www.boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=2915293) is my description of the article. The headline did indeed read something like “Cyclops Fossil found in Greece,” but the body of the article just speculated that it was possible that that was the source of the myth.

I’ve also seen a reconstruction of a [glyptodon](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glyptodon) with a prehensile snout, but that does not appear to be widely accepted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/8 "2012-09-01T00:32:38Z")

</div>

The length of the tusks might give us some idea that the entire snout was at least able to reach past them. Since the elephants trunk is very long and flexible we may not have guessed right about the shape, size, and functionality of the trunk.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freakenstein](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b782af/32.png) [@Freakenstein](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freakenstein)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 9:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/9 "2012-09-01T09:19:24Z")

</div>

How near to the ground an elephant can reach with just its mouth, the distance between has to be covered with something. Unless one assumes they were eating just leaves from the trees, but I’m not sure if their heads are too massive for that. And drinking would mean wading into the water which I think is not always a good idea.  
Also they could be considered something like hippos ( and they are good swimmers using the trunk as a snorkel ), maybe they ate seaweed ( teeth would exclude fish ).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Meurglys](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/258eb7/32.png) [@Meurglys](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Meurglys)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 9:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/10 "2012-09-01T09:33:32Z")

</div>

> [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](#):
>
> The article is no longer on CNN, but [Here](http://www.boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=2915293) is my description of the article. The headline did indeed read something like “Cyclops Fossil found in Greece,” but the body of the article just speculated that it was possible that that was the source of the myth.

There’s a fairly recent BBC documentary about how fossils, etc. were perceived in the past, including this story. [Brief details of it here](http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b014lsgb), although I have no idea when it might be shown again, or if it’s available in the US somehow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FuzzyOgre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a587f6/32.png) [@FuzzyOgre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FuzzyOgre)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 10:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/11 "2012-09-01T10:36:29Z")

</div>

There are some frozen baby mammoths, so adult trunk length can be extrapolated from that.

> **[National Geographic](https://www.nationalgeographic.com/)**
>
> Explore National Geographic. A world leader in geography, cartography and exploration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/12 "2012-09-01T14:16:46Z")

</div>

I’m with **Freakenstein** on this. They’ve got tall bodies, short necks and heads, and low-flexibility legs. They have to be able to reach surface water somehow, and given that we’ve already established that they have a trunk of _some_ length, it’s logical to guess that it’s long enough to reach the ground.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 2:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/13 "2012-09-01T14:20:32Z")

</div>

(Aside: We humans also have tall bodies and short necks, but no trunks. That’s because, as observed by the greatest of American scientists, [we’re meant to drink wine](http://theobligatescientist.blogspot.com/2010/08/benjamin-franklin-on-wine-god-and.html).)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@Frylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frylock)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/14 "2012-09-01T15:06:11Z")

</div>

Good points, everyone.

I think it would be fun for some artist to make “artist’s renditions” of contemporary animals based only on their skeletons, pretending no knowledge of what they actually look like…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/elephants-trunks-deducible-from-skeleton/633311/15 "2012-09-01T22:07:54Z")

</div>

> [@Frylock](#):
>
> Good points, everyone.
> 
> I think it would be fun for some artist to make “artist’s renditions” of contemporary animals based only on their skeletons, pretending no knowledge of what they actually look like…

Just as an example, one might reconstruct a horse to be really, really shaggy. Just from the skeleton, how would one know they have short hair on their bodies?
